Runge v. Runge, 625 N.W.2d 264 (N.D. 2001). · Go Syfert
Search
Runge v. Runge, 625 N.W.2d 264 (N.D. 2001). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
5 citation events (5 in the last 25 years) across 1 distinct court.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Gregory Ian Runge, and
v.
Karen Kathleen Runge, And
20000121.
North Dakota Supreme Court.
Feb 20, 2001.
625 N.W.2d 264
Edwin W. F. Dyer (argued), Dyer Summers, P.C., P.O. Box 2261, Bismarck, N.D. 58502-2261, for plaintiff and appellant. Gregory Ian Runge, 418 E. Rosser Ave., Suite A, Bismarck, N.D. 58501. Monte L. Rogneby, Vogel Law Firm, P.O. Box 2097, Bismarck, N.D. 58502-2097, for defendant and appellee.
Cited by 5 opinions  |  Published

NOTE: SUMMARY OPINION, SEE NORTH DAKOTA RULES OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE, RULE 35.1

[¶ 1] Gregory Ian Runge appealed the district court's judgment determining the valuation and division of marital property. Gregory Runge claims the trial court erred by not explaining the distribution and by dividing the couple's property inequitably. We conclude the trial court's distribution of the couple's marital estate is not clearly erroneous. We therefore affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2).

[¶ 2] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.

Dale V. Sandstrom

William A. Neumann

Mary Muehlen Maring

Gordon O. Hoberg, S.J.

[¶ 3] Gordon O. Hoberg, S.J., sitting in place of Kapsner, J., disqualified.