Stockton Port Dist. v. Fed. Mar. Comm'n, 386 U.S. 1031 (1967). · Go Syfert
Search
Stockton Port Dist. v. Fed. Mar. Comm'n, 386 U.S. 1031 (1967). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
33 citation events across 17 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Kansas City Southern Railway Company v. Great Lakes Carbon Corporation (ca8, 1980-06-16)
Treatment trajectory · 1969 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1969 1997 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 4 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" Kansas City Southern Railway Company v. Great Lakes Carbon Corporation (2×)
8th Cir. · 1980 · signal: see · confidence high
“Section 17(9) [renumbered as § 17(10), recodified as § 10325] provides that after an application for rehearing, reargument, or reconsideration has been denied or otherwise disposed of, a suit may be brought to enforce, enjoin, suspend, or set aside the Commission decision, order, or requirement.” Atlantic, supra, 383 U.S. at 582-83 , 86 S.Ct. at 1005 (footnote omitted); see United States v. Southern Ry., 364 F.2d 86, 92-93 (5th Cir. 1966), cert. denied, 386 U.S. 1031 , 87 S.Ct. 1479 , 18 L.Ed.2d 592 (1967); Southern Ry. v. United States, 412 F.Supp. 1122 , 1134-35 & n. 31 (D.D.C.1976); …
cited Cited "see" The Board of Trade of the City of Chicago v. Commodity Futures Trading Commission
7th Cir. · 1979 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Southern Railway Company, 364 F.2d 86, 94-95 (5th Cir. 1966), cert. denied, 386 U.S. 1031 , 87 S.Ct. 1479 , 18 L.Ed.2d 592 (1967). 8 .
cited Cited "see, e.g." State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. Sweat
N.D. Ga. · 1982 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., United States v. Southern Railway Co., 364 F.2d 86 (5th Cir. 1966), cert, denied, 386 U.S. 1031 , 87 S.Ct. 1479 , 18 L.Ed.2d 592 (1967).
cited Cited "see, e.g." General Mills, Inc. v. United States
D. Minnesota · 1973 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e. g., United States v. Southern Ry., 364 F.2d 86 (5th Cir. 1966), cert. denied, 386 U.S. 1031 , 87 S.Ct. 1479 , 18 L.Ed.2d 592 (1967). .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Stockton Port District
v.
Federal Maritime Commission
No. 1064.
Supreme Court of the United States.
May 8, 1967.
386 U.S. 1031
J. Richard Townsend for petitioner. Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Turner, Howard E. Shapiro, Irwin A. Seibel and Robert N. Katz for respondent Federal Maritime Commission et al.; Edward D. Ransom for respondent Pacific Westbound Conference; and Thomas C. Lynch, Attorney General, and Miriam E. Wolff, Deputy Attorney General, for respondent State of California.
Published

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.