Brown v. Gen. Motors Corp., 386 U.S. 1036 (1967). · Go Syfert
Search
Brown v. Gen. Motors Corp., 386 U.S. 1036 (1967). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
G Cite
cited 2× by 2 distinct cases, last quoted 1995 · 2 courts · …contributory negligence need not be considered ... where, as here, a consumer uses a product in a manner not intended by the manufacturer and suffers an injury as a result, he may not recover because such misuse is beyond the scope of the warranty ⚠ not in text
97 citation events (1 in the last 25 years) across 41 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: prod.liab.rep. (Cch) P 14,400 Vera Jones, of the Estate of James Jones, and James Jones v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corporation, a Delaware Corporation v. Amchem Products, Incorporated Armstrong World Industries, Incorporated, Formerly Known as Armstrong Cork Company Carey Canada, Incorporated the Celotex Corporation, Individually and as Successor-In-Interest of Philip Carey Manufacturing Company, Philip Carey Corporation, Panacon Corporation, Glen Alden Corporation, Rapid American Corporation, Briggs Manufacturing Company, and Smith and Kanzler, a Delaware Corporation Eagle-Picher Industries, Incorporated, an Ohio Corporation Fibreboard Corporation, Pabco Industrial Products Division, a Delaware Corporation Flexitallic Gasket Company, Incorporated, a Connecticut Corporation Gaf Corporation, a Delaware Corporation Garlock, Incorporated, Precision Seal Division, an Ohio Corporation A.P. Greene Refractories Company Keene Corporation, Individually and as Successor-In-Interest to Keene Building Products Corporation, Keene Insulation Products Corporation, Ehret Magnesia Manufacturing Company, Baldwin-Ehret-Hill, Incorporated, Baldwin-Hill Company, and Mundet Cork Corporation, a New York Corporation National Gypsum Company, a Delaware Corporation Owens-Illinois, Incorporated, an Ohio Corporation Pittsburgh-Corning Corporation, Individually and as Successor-In-Interest to Union Asbestos and Rubber Company (Unarco), a Pennsylvania Corporation H.K. Porter Company, Incorporated, Individually and as Successor-In-Interest to Southern Asbestos, Carolina Asbestos, Thermoid and Tullman-Mccluskey, a Delaware Corporation Turner & Newall, P.L.C., Individually and as Alter Ego of Keasby and Mattison General Refractories Company, Grefco M.H. Dietrick, Samuel H. Culverhouse Mattie Culverhouse v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corporation, a Delaware Corporation, and Amchem Products, Incorporated Armstrong World Industries, Incorporated, Formerly Known as Armstrong Cork Company the Celotex Corporation, Individually and as Successor-In-Interest of Philip Carey Manufacturing Company, Philip Carey Corporation, Panacon Corporation, Glen Alden Corporation, Rapid American Corporation, Briggs Manufacturing Company, and Smith and Kanzler, a Delaware Corporation Eagle-Picher Industries, Incorporated, an Ohio Corporation Fibreboard Corporation, Pabco Industrial Products Division, a Delaware Corporation Flexitallic Gasket Company, Incorporated, a Connecticut Corporation Gaf Corporation, a Delaware Corporation Garlock, Incorporated, Precision Seal Division, an Ohio Corporation Keene Corporation, Individually and as Successor-In-Interest to Keene Building Products Corporation, Keene Insulation Products Corporation, Ehret Magnesia Manufacturing Company, Baldwin-Ehret-Hill, Incorporated, Baldwin-Hill Company, and Mundet Cork Corporation, a New York Corporation National Gypsum Company, a Delaware Corporation Owens-Illinois, Incorporated, an Ohio Corporation Pittsburgh-Corning Corporation, Individually and as Successor-In-Interest to Union Asbestos and Rubber Company (Unarco), a Pennsylvania Corporation H.K. Porter Company, Incorporated, Individually and as Successor-In-Interest to Southern Asbestos, Carolina Asbestos, Thermoid and Tullman-Mccluskey, a Delaware Corporation Turner & Newall, P.L.C., Individually and as Alter Ego of Keasby and Mattison Combustion Engineering, Incorporated Flintkote Company, a Massachusetts Corporation W.R. Grace & Company, a Connecticut Corporation Raytech, Successor to Raymark Industries, Incorporated, Successor-In-Interest to Raybestos-Manhattan, Incorporated Rock Wool Manufacturing Company, Incorporated, an Alabama Corporation United States Gypsum Company, Inc. v. Manville Corporation Asbestos Disease Compensation Fund, Third-Party (ca3, 1995-11-03)
Treatment trajectory · 1967 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1967 1996 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 15 distinct citers. How cited ↗
examined Cited as authority (quoted) prod.liab.rep. (Cch) P 14,400 Vera Jones, of the Estate of James Jones, and James Jones v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corporation, a Delaware Corporation v. Amchem Products, Incorporated Armstrong World Industries, Incorporated, Formerly Known as Armstrong Cork Company Carey Canada, Incorporated the Celotex Corporation, Individually and as Successor-In-Interest of Philip Carey Manufacturing Company, Philip Carey Corporation, Panacon Corporation, Glen Alden Corporation, Rapid American Corporation, Briggs Manufacturing Company, and Smith and Kanzler, a Delaware Corporation Eagle-Picher Industries, Incorporated, an Ohio Corporation Fibreboard Corporation, Pabco Industrial Products Division, a Delaware Corporation Flexitallic Gasket Company, Incorporated, a Connecticut Corporation Gaf Corporation, a Delaware Corporation Garlock, Incorporated, Precision Seal Division, an Ohio Corporation A.P. Greene Refractories Company Keene Corporation, Individually and as Successor-In-Interest to Keene Building Products Corporation, Keene Insulation Products Corporation, Ehret Magnesia Manufacturing Company, Baldwin-Ehret-Hill, Incorporated, Baldwin-Hill Company, and Mundet Cork Corporation, a New York Corporation National Gypsum Company, a Delaware Corporation Owens-Illinois, Incorporated, an Ohio Corporation Pittsburgh-Corning Corporation, Individually and as Successor-In-Interest to Union Asbestos and Rubber Company (Unarco), a Pennsylvania Corporation H.K. Porter Company, Incorporated, Individually and as Successor-In-Interest to Southern Asbestos, Carolina Asbestos, Thermoid and Tullman-Mccluskey, a Delaware Corporation Turner & Newall, P.L.C., Individually and as Alter Ego of Keasby and Mattison General Refractories Company, Grefco M.H. Dietrick, Samuel H. Culverhouse Mattie Culverhouse v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corporation, a Delaware Corporation, and Amchem Products, Incorporated Armstrong World Industries, Incorporated, Formerly Known as Armstrong Cork Company the Celotex Corporation, Individually and as Successor-In-Interest of Philip Carey Manufacturing Company, Philip Carey Corporation, Panacon Corporation, Glen Alden Corporation, Rapid American Corporation, Briggs Manufacturing Company, and Smith and Kanzler, a Delaware Corporation Eagle-Picher Industries, Incorporated, an Ohio Corporation Fibreboard Corporation, Pabco Industrial Products Division, a Delaware Corporation Flexitallic Gasket Company, Incorporated, a Connecticut Corporation Gaf Corporation, a Delaware Corporation Garlock, Incorporated, Precision Seal Division, an Ohio Corporation Keene Corporation, Individually and as Successor-In-Interest to Keene Building Products Corporation, Keene Insulation Products Corporation, Ehret Magnesia Manufacturing Company, Baldwin-Ehret-Hill, Incorporated, Baldwin-Hill Company, and Mundet Cork Corporation, a New York Corporation National Gypsum Company, a Delaware Corporation Owens-Illinois, Incorporated, an Ohio Corporation Pittsburgh-Corning Corporation, Individually and as Successor-In-Interest to Union Asbestos and Rubber Company (Unarco), a Pennsylvania Corporation H.K. Porter Company, Incorporated, Individually and as Successor-In-Interest to Southern Asbestos, Carolina Asbestos, Thermoid and Tullman-Mccluskey, a Delaware Corporation Turner & Newall, P.L.C., Individually and as Alter Ego of Keasby and Mattison Combustion Engineering, Incorporated Flintkote Company, a Massachusetts Corporation W.R. Grace & Company, a Connecticut Corporation Raytech, Successor to Raymark Industries, Incorporated, Successor-In-Interest to Raybestos-Manhattan, Incorporated Rock Wool Manufacturing Company, Incorporated, an Alabama Corporation United States Gypsum Company, Inc. v. Manville Corporation Asbestos Disease Compensation Fund, Third-Party
3rd Cir. · 1995 · signal: see, e.g. · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence low
contributory negligence need not be considered ... where, as here, a consumer uses a product in a manner not intended by the manufacturer and suffers an injury as a result, he may not recover because such misuse is beyond the scope of the warranty
examined Cited as authority (quoted) Jones v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp.
4th Cir. · 1995 · signal: see, e.g. · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence low
contributory negligence need not be considered ... where, as here, a consumer uses a product in a manner not intended by the manufacturer and suffers an injury as a result, he may not recover because such misuse is beyond the scope of the warranty
cited Cited "see" State v. Florez
N.J. · 1994 · signal: see · confidence high
Id. at 384, 365 A.2d 914 ; see McCray v. Illinois, 386 U.S. 300, 311 , 87 S.Ct. 1056, 1062 , 18 L.Ed.2d 62, 70 , reh’g denied, 386 U.S. 1042 , 87 S.Ct. 1474 , 18 L.Ed.2d 616 (1967).
cited Cited "see" State v. Creason
N.C. Ct. App. · 1984 · signal: see · confidence high
See McCray v. Illinois, 386 U.S. 300 , 18 L.Ed. 2d 62 , 87 S.Ct. 1056 , reh. denied, 386 U.S. 1042 , 18 L.Ed. 2d 616 , 87 S.Ct. 1474 (1967).
discussed Cited "see" Preston B. Purvis v. Consolidated Energy Products Company, a Division of Condec Corporation (2×)
4th Cir. · 1982 · signal: see · confidence high
See Brown v. General Motors Corp., 355 F.2d 814, 821 (4 Cir. 1966), cert. denied, 386 U.S. 1036 , 87 S.Ct. 1474 , 18 L.Ed.2d 600 (1967); Restatement (Second) § 402A, Comment e (“public policy demands that the burden of accidental injuries caused by products intended for consumption be placed upon those who market them, and be treated as a cost of production against which liability insurance can be obtained”).
discussed Cited "see" State v. Martinez
Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · 1980 · signal: see · confidence high
See, McCray v. Illinois, 386 U.S. 300 , 87 S.Ct. 1056 , 18 L.Ed.2d 62 , reh. denied, 386 U.S. 1042 , 87 S.Ct. 1474 , 18 L.Ed.2d 616 (1967); State v. Katz, 295 So.2d 356 (Fla. 4th DCA 1974); State v. Matney, 236 So.2d 166 (Fla. 1st DCA 1970); Pearson v. State, 190 So.2d 425 (Fla. 3d DCA 1966), cert. denied, 200 So.2d 814 (Fla. 1967); Dasher v. State, 178 So.2d 61 (Fla. 3d DCA 1965); F.R.Cr.P. 3.220(c)(2).
discussed Cited "see" Eddie Sandoval v. Ralph Lee Aaron
10th Cir. · 1977 · signal: see · confidence high
See McCray v. Illinois, 386 U.S. 300 , 87 S.Ct. 1056 , 18 L.Ed.2d 62 (1967), rehearing denied 386 U.S. 1042 , 87 S.Ct. 1474 , 18 L.Ed.2d 616 ; United States v. Waters, 461 F.2d 248 (10th Cir. 1972), cert. denied 409 U.S. 880 , 93 S.Ct. 207 , 34 L.Ed.2d 134 ; United States v. Anderson, 509 F.2d 724 (9th Cir. 1975), cert. denied 420 U.S. 910 , 95 S.Ct. 831 , 42 L.Ed.2d 840 .
discussed Cited "see" Dreisonstok v. Volkswagenwerk
4th Cir. · 1974 · signal: see · confidence high
See Brown v. General Motors Corporation (4th Cir. 1966) 355 F.2d 814, 821 , cert. denied 386 U.S. 1036 , 87 S.Ct. 1474 , 18 L.Ed.2d 600 ; Gray v. General Motors Corporation (8th Cir. 1970) 434 F.2d 110, 114 ; Note, 1966 Utah L.Rev. 698, 705.
discussed Cited "see" Dreisonstok v. Volkswagenwerk
4th Cir. · 1974 · signal: see · confidence high
See Brown v. General Motors Corporation (4th Cir. 1966) 355 F.2d 814, 821 , cert. denied 386 U.S. 1036 , 87 S.Ct. 1474 , 18 L.Ed.2d 600 ; Gray v. General Motors Corporation (8th Cir. 1970) 434 F.2d 110, 114 ; Note, 1966 Utah L.Rev. 698, 705.
discussed Cited "see" People v. Barker
Mich. Ct. App. · 1969 · signal: see · confidence high
See McCray v. Illinois (1967), 386 US 300, 301, 315 ( 87 S Ct 1056 , 18 L Ed 2d 62 ), reh den 386 US 1042 ( 87 S Ct 1474 , 18 L Ed 2d 616 ), where, although the search was held reasonable, both the majority and dissenting opinions cited Mapp as governing authority.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." State v. Salley
N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. · 1993 · signal: see also · confidence low
"Whether a proper balance renders nondisclosure erroneous must depend on the particular circumstances of each case, taking into consideration the crime charged, the possible defenses, the possible significance of the informer's testimony, and other relevant factors." Ibid.; see also McCray v. Illinois, 386 U.S. 300 , 87 S.Ct. 1056 , 18 L.Ed. 2d 62 , reh'g denied, 386 U.S. 1042 , 87 S.Ct. 1474 , 18 L.Ed. 2d 616 (1967).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Hermes Consolidated, Inc. v. United States
Ct. Cl. · 1988 · signal: see also · confidence low
Its sales may have been reduced to a third and its employees reduced to a fraction, but the company never terminated, see Treas.Reg. § 1.382(a)-14(h)(6) (example 1 & 2) (1978); Glover Packing of Texas v. United States, 164 Ct.Cl. 572, 581 , 328 F.2d 342, 348 (1964); see also United States v. Fenix & Scisson, Inc., 360 F.2d 260, 266 (10th Cir.1966), ce rt. denied, 386 U.S. 1036 , 87 S.Ct. 1474 , 18 L.Ed.2d 599 (1967) (the corporation was inactive where its company had voted to liquidate, its business abandoned and only turned to the rental of property leaving a few employees), nor even suspend…
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Charlette A. Karns, Individually, and as Mother and Next Friend of Donald Wayne Pearce v. Emerson Electric Co., a Missouri Corporation
10th Cir. · 1987 · signal: see also · confidence low
Corp., 752 F.2d 168, 172 (5th Cir.1985); see also United States v. Fenix & Scisson, Inc., 360 F.2d 260, 265-66 (10th Cir.1966) (motion for judgment n.o.v. "may not enlarge or assert new matters not presented in the motion for directed verdict," but technical precision not required), cert. denied, 386 U.S. 1036 , 87 S.Ct. 1474 , 18 L.Ed.2d 599 (1967).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." People v. Rivas
Cal. Ct. App. · 1985 · signal: see also · confidence low
The Supreme Court ultimately held the judge had erred in failing to allow cross-examination on the issue of the reliability of the informant, ruling that “[f]ull cross-examination of prosecution witnesses concerning informant reliability . . . appears to be a constitutional prerequisite to invoking the informant privilege.” (Parsley, supra, at p. 942 ; see also McCray v. Illinois (1967) 386 U.S. 300, 313 [ 18 L.Ed.2d 62, 71 , 87 S.Ct. 1056 ], rehg. den. 386 U.S. 1042 [ 18 L.Ed.2d 616 , 87 S.Ct. 1474 ].) Most recently, in Tharp v. Superior Court (1984) 154 Cal.App.3d 215 [ 201 Cal.Rptr. 131…
discussed Cited "see, e.g." State v. Walker (2×)
N.C. Ct. App. · 1984 · signal: see also · confidence low
See State v. Ketchie, 286 N.C. 387 , 211 S.E.2d 207 (1975); see also McCray v. Illinois, 386 U.S. 300 , 87 S.Ct. 1056 , 18 L.Ed.2d 62 , reh'g denied, 386 U.S. 1042 , 87 S.Ct. 1474 , 18 L.Ed.2d 616 (1967).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Brown
v.
General Motors Corp.
No. 211.
Supreme Court of the United States.
May 8, 1967.
386 U.S. 1036
Wm. Clarence Kluttz and Lewis P. Hamlin, Jr., for petitioner. Bynum M: Hunter for respondent.
Are, Black, Douglas, Granted, Should.
Cited by 1 opinion  |  Published
1 passages pin-cited by 2 cases
Pinpoint authority: bottom 92%
Citer courts: Third Circuit (1) · Fourth Circuit (1)

C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.

Mr. Justice Black, Mr. Justice Douglas and Mr. Justice Fortas are of the opinion that certiorari should be granted.