green
Positive treatment
3.2 score
Treatment trajectory · 1967 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1967
1996
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 5 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Willin v. Ajello
See United States v. Re, 372 F.2d 641, 643 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 388 U.S. 912 , 87 S.Ct. 2112 , 18 L.Ed.2d 1352 (1967) (probationary status is “custody” for habeas corpus purposes); cf. Hensley v. Municipal Court, 411 U.S. 345, 351-53 , 93 S.Ct. 1571 , 1574 -1575, 36 L.Ed.2d 294 (1973) (“in custody” requirement satisfied despite release of defendant on his own recognizance pending execution of sentence); United States ex rel.
discussed
Cited "see"
Stone v. Powell
(2×)
also: Cited "see, e.g."
See Fay v. Noia, 372 U. S. 391, 425-426 ." Id., at 539 . [12] Compare, e. g., United States v. Re, 372 F. 2d 641 (CA2), cert. denied, 388 U. S. 912 (1967); United States v. Jenkins, 281 F. 2d 193 (CA3 1960); Eisner v. United States, 351 F. 2d 55 (CA6 1965); De Welles v. United States, 372 F. 2d 67 (CA7), cert denied, 388 U. S. 919 (1967); Williams v. United States, 307 F. 2d 366 (CA9 1962); Armstead v. United States, 318 F. 2d 725 (CA5 1963), with, e. g., United States v. Sutton, 321 F. 2d 221 (CA4 1963); Gaitan v. United States, 317 F. 2d 494 (CA10 1963).
cited
Cited "see"
Overton v. Rieger
See United States v. Re, 372 F.2d 641 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 388 U.S. 912 , 87 S.Ct. 2112 , 18 L.Ed.2d 1352 (1967).
cited
Cited "see"
Lawrence C. Pope v. United States
See United States v. Re, 2 Cir. 1967, 372 F.2d 641 , cert. denied 388 U.S. 912 , 87 S.Ct. 2112 , 18 L.Ed.2d 1352 .
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Clausell v. Turner
See also United States v. Re, 372 F.2d 641, 645-646 (2d Cir.) (concurring opinion), cert. denied, 388 U.S. 912 , 87 S.Ct. 2112 , 18 L.Ed.2d 1352 (1967).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Wenzler
v.
Pitchess, Sheriff
v.
Pitchess, Sheriff
No. 616.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 12, 1967.
Stanley Fleishman for petitioner., Byron B. Gentry for respondents.
Basis, Black, Douglas, Would, York.
Cited by 2 opinions | Published
C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Mr. Justice Black, Mr. Justice Douglas and Mr. Justice Stewart would reverse on the basis of Redrup v. New York, 386 U. S. 767.