green
Positive treatment
5.0 score
Treatment trajectory · 1968 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1968
1997
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 14 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Larry Dwight Jaynes and April Marie Jaynes
See Ross v. United States, 374 F.2d 97, 102 (8th Cir.) (where the defendant endorsed Social Security checks in the name of her deceased mother “without embellishment by way of agency or other qualifying designation,” she could be guilty of forgery), cert. denied, 389 U.S. 882 , 88 S.Ct. 130 , 19 L.Ed.2d 177 (1967); United States v. Wilkins, 328 F.2d 120, 121 (2d Cir.1964) (where a check was negotiated by signing the payee’s name without any written indication of agency, the endorser could be guilty of forgery despite an oral representation of authority).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Raymond Lester Spaar
Accord Ross v. United States, 374 F.2d 97, 105 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 389 U.S. 882 , 88 S.Ct. 130 , 19 L.Ed.2d 177 (1967); United States v. Baldwin, 607 F.2d 1295 (9th Cir.1979).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Nancy Baker and William James Reeder
See Ross v. United States, 374 F.2d 97, 105 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 389 U.S. 882 , 88 S.Ct. 130 , 19 L.Ed.2d 177 (1967).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Baker
See Ross v. United States, 374 F.2d 97,105 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 389 U.S. 882 , 88 S.Ct. 130 , 19 L.Ed.2d 177 (1967).
cited
Cited "see"
Wilson v. State
See Minor v. United States, 375 F. 2d 170 (8 Cir., 1967), cert. den. 389 U.S. 882 , 88 S. Ct. 131 , 19 L.
discussed
Cited "see"
Willie Crenshaw v. Charles L. Wolff, Jr., Warden
See Cardarella v. United States, 375 F.2d 222, 230 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 389 U.S. 882 , 88 S.Ct. 129 , 19 L.Fd.2d 176 (1967) : [A] charge of inadequate representation can prevail “only if it can be said that what was or was not done by defendant’s attorney for his client made the proceedings a farce or mockery of justice, shocking to the conscience of the Court.” See also Brown v. Swenson, 487 F.2d 1236, 1240 (8th Cir. 1973), cert. denied, 416 U.S. 944 , 94 S.Ct. 1952 , 40 L.Ed.2d 296 (1974) ; Scalf v. Bennett, 408 F.2d 325, 327-328 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 396 U.S. 887 , 90 S.Ct. 1…
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Corbett
See Cardarella v. United States, 375 F.2d 222 (8th Cir.), cert. denied 389 U.S. 882 , 88 S.Ct. 129 , 19 L.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Theodore Roosevelt Harris
(2×)
See Tyler v. United States, 5 Cir. 1968, 397 F.2d 565 , cert. denied, 394 U.S. 917 , 89 S.Ct. 1187 , 22 L.Ed.2d 450 ; Grant v. United States, 5 Cir. 1966, 368 F.2d 658 ; Estes v. United States, 5 Cir. 1964, 335 F.2d 609 , cert. denied, 379 U.S. 964 , 85 S.Ct. 656 , 13 L.Ed.2d 559 ; accord, Cardarella v. United States, 8 Cir. 1967, 375 F.2d 222 , cert. denied, 389 U.S. 882 , 88 S.Ct. 129 , 19 L.Ed.2d 176 ; Hines v. United States, 10 Cir. 1966, 365 F.2d 649 ; United States v. Breland, 2 Cir. 1967, 376 F.2d 721 ; see generally, Holt v. United States, 1910, 218 U.S. 245 , 31 S.Ct. 2 , 54 L.Ed. 102…
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Michael Allen Mattin
See, Ross v. United States, 374 F.2d 97 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 389 U.S. 882 , 88 S.Ct. 130 , 19 L.Ed.2d 177 (1967).
cited
Cited "see"
Henry Kenneth Wangrow v. United States of America (Two Cases). Daniel Edmund Czajkowski and Mark Edward Murphy v. United States of America (Two Cases)
See generally, Minor v. United States, 375 F.2d 170 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 389 U.S. 882 , 83 S.Ct. 131 , 19 L.Ed.2d 177 (1967). 6.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Bergeron
See also Cardarella v. United States, 375 F.2d 222 (8th Cir.1967), cert. denied, 389 U.S. 882 , 88 S.Ct. 129 , 19 L.Ed.2d 176 (1967); State v. Robbins, supra. In this case the defendant was unable to identify any specific instance of prejudicial conduct.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Flores v. Estelle
See generally Naples v. United States, 1964, 120 U.S.App.D.C. 123 , 344 F.2d 508, 513 ; United States v. Dunn, 6 Cir. 1962, 299 F.2d 548, 554 ; Pinkard v. United States, 1957, 99 U.S. App.D.C. 394, 240 F.2d 632, 633 ; see also Minor v. United States, 8 Cir. 1967, 375 F.2d 170, 173 , cert. denied, 389 U.S. 882 , 88 S.Ct. 131 , 19 L.Ed.2d 177 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Jerome Flores, Jr. v. W. J. Estelle, Director, Texas Department of Corrections, Augustine Mendoza Ortega v. W. J. Estelle, Director, Texas Department of Corrections
See generally Naples v. United States, 1964, 120 U.S.App.D.C. 123 , 344 F.2d 508, 513 ; United States v. Dunn, 6 Cir. 1962, 299 F.2d 548, 554 ; Pinkard v. United States, 1957, 99 U.S.App.D.C. 394 , 240 F.2d 632, 633 ; see also Minor v. United States, 8 Cir. 1967, 375 F.2d 170, 173 , cert. denied, 389 U.S. 882 , 88 S.Ct. 131 , 19 L.Ed.2d 177 . 22 Apparently, but not explicitly, recognizing the aptness of these authorities, the majority rests its affirmance on the conclusion that the habeas petitioners waived their hearsay objection in the proceeding below.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. McGinnis
See, e. g., Cardarella v. United States, 375 F.2d 222 , 226 n. 2 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 389 U.S. 882 , 88 S.Ct. 129 , 19 L.Ed.2d 176 (1967).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Gillespie
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 107.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 9, 1967.
Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Vinson, Beatrice Rosenberg and Robert G. Maysack for the United States.
Published
C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.