Amsbaugh v. Amsbaugh (N.D. 2004). · Go Syfert
Amsbaugh v. Amsbaugh (N.D. 2004). Book View Copy Cite
63 citation events (63 in the last 25 years) across 1 distinct court.
Strongest positive: Wolt v. Wolt (nd, 2010-02-17)
Treatment trajectory · 2004 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2004 2015 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers. How cited ↗
cited Cited as authority (rule) Wolt v. Wolt
N.D. · 2010 · confidence medium
Amsbaugh v. Amsbaugh, 2004 ND 11, ¶ 12, 673 N.W.2d 601 .
cited Cited "see" Hollingsworth v. Hollingsworth
N.D. · 2025 · signal: see · confidence high
See Amsbaugh, 2004 ND 11, ¶ 15 (concluding the district court did not clearly err by finding the value of the marital home was within the range of evidence presented).
discussed Cited "see" Lee v. Lee (2×)
N.D. · 2007 · signal: see · confidence high
See Amsbaugh, 2004 ND 11, ¶ 45 , 673 N.W.2d 601 .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Amsbaugh
v.
Amsbaugh
20030059.
North Dakota Supreme Court.
Jan 14, 2004.
Published

Filed 1/14/04 by Clerk of Supreme Court

IN THE SUPREME COURT

STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA

2004 ND 1

State of North Dakota, Plaintiff and Appellee

v.

Thomas A. Skalicky, Defendant and Appellant

Nos. 20030163-20030167

Appeal from the District Court of Williams County, Northwest Judicial District, the Honorable Gerald H. Rustad, Judge.

AFFIRMED.

Per Curiam.

Nicole E. Foster (argued), State’s Attorney, and Marlyce A. Wilder (appeared), Assistant State’s Attorney, P.O. Box 2047, Williston, ND 58802-2047, for plaintiff and appellee.

Kevin J. Chapman, Townsite Bldg., 2 nd Fl., P.O. Box 1920, Williston, ND 58802-1920, for defendant and appellant.

State v. Skalicky

Nos. 20030163-20030167

Per Curiam.

[¶1] Thomas Skalicky appeals the order of the district court denying his application for post-conviction relief.   He argued his consecutive sentences for robbery under N.D.C.C. § 12.1-22-01 and burglary under N.D.C.C. § 12.1-22-02(2)(a) violated the constitutional prohibition against double jeopardy.  Each offense to which Skalicky pleaded guilty “contains an element not contained in the other.”   City of Fargo v. Martin Sewall Hector , 534 N.W.2d 821, 823 (N.D. 1995)(citing United States v. Dixon , 509 U.S. 688, 696 (1993), applying Blockburger v. United States , 284 U.S. 299 (1932)).  Double jeopardy does not apply.  We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(7).

[¶2] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.

Carol Ronning Kapsner

Dale V. Sandstrom

William A. Neumann

Mary Muehlen Maring