green
Positive treatment
4.6 score
Treatment trajectory · 1970 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1970
1998
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 9 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
People Ex Rel. VanMeveren v. District Court in & for the County of Larimer
(2×)
See People v. Ross, 41 Ill.2d 445 , 244 N.E.2d 608 (1969), cert. denied, 395 U.S. 920 , 89 S.Ct. 1771 , 23 L.Ed.2d 237 (1969). 5 Such construction comports with present day notions of security law, avoids hypertechnical results stemming from property concepts developed in a bygone era, and furthers legislative intent in extending the protection of the arson statute to property rights as well as the traditional right of occupancy or possession.
discussed
Cited "see"
George Pettus v. American Airlines, Inc.
See Young & Co. v. Shea, 397 F.2d 185 (5th Cir.), Rehearing denied, 404 F.2d 1059 (5th Cir. 1968), Cert. denied, 395 U.S. 920 , 89 S.Ct. 1771 , 23 L.Ed.2d 237 (1969). 57 Since I believe that the District of Columbia was not precluded by full faith and credit, Res judicata or collateral estoppel from entertaining Pettus' claim, I would affirm the decision of the United States Department of Labor, Benefits Review Board.
cited
Cited "see"
Pettus v. American Airlines, Inc.
See Young & Co. v. Shea, 397 F.2d 185 (5th Cir.), rehearing denied, 404 F.2d 1059 (5th Cir. 1968), cert. denied, 395 U.S. 920 , 89 S.Ct. 1771 , 23 L.Ed.2d 237 (1969).
discussed
Cited "see"
Newport News Shipbuilding & Dry Dock Co. v. Director
See Young & Company v. Shea, 397 F.2d 185, 188-189 (5 Cir. 1968), cert. denied, 395 U.S. 920 , 89 S.Ct. 1771 , 23 L.Ed.2d 237 (1969); Strachan Shipping Company v. Shea, 276 F.Supp. 610, 612-614 (S.D.Tex.1967), aff’d. per curiam, 406 F.2d 521 (5 Cir. 1969), cert. denied, 395 U.S. 921 , 89 S.Ct. 1773 , 23 L.Ed.2d 238 (1969); Longshoremen’s and Harbor Workers’ Compensation Act, § 20, 33 U.S.C. § 920 (1970).
discussed
Cited "see"
Newport News Shipbuilding And Dry Dock Company v. Director, Office Of Workers' Compensation Programs
See Young & Company v. Shea, 397 F.2d 185, 188-189 (5 Cir. 1968), Cert. denied, 395 U.S. 920 , 89 S.Ct. 1771 , 23 L.Ed.2d 237 (1969); Strachan Shipping Company v. Shea, 276 F.Supp. 610, 612-614 (S.D.Tex.1967), Aff'd. per curiam, 406 F.2d 521 (5 Cir. 1969), Cert. denied, 395 U.S. 921 , 89 S.Ct. 1773 , 23 L.Ed.2d 238 (1969); Longshoremen's and Harbor Workers' Compensation Act, § 20, 33 U.S.C. § 920 (1970).
discussed
Cited "see"
Tampa Ship Repair & Dry Dock Co., Inc. v. Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs, and James M. Duran
Friend v. Britton, 95 U.S.App.D.C. 139 , 220 F.2d 820 , cert. denied, 350 U.S. 836 , 76 S.Ct. 72 , 100 L.Ed. 745 (1955); See Young & Co. v. Shea, 404 F.2d 1059 (5th Cir. 1968), cert. denied, 395 U.S. 920 , 89 S.Ct. 1771 , 23 L.Ed.2d 237 (1969).
cited
Cited "see"
Fireman's Fund Insurance Company and Luckenbach Steamship Company, Inc. v. Robert H. Bergeron, Deputy Commissioner, United States Department of Labor
See Young and Co. v. Shea, 397 F.2d 185 (5th Cir. 1968), reh. denied, 404 F.2d 1059 , cert. denied, 395 U.S. 920 , 89 S.Ct. 1771 , 23 L.Ed.2d 237 (1969).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Joseph A. Langone, III
See Burke v. United States, 5 Cir., 1968, 400 F.2d 866 , cert. denied, 395 U.S. 919 , 89 S.Ct. 1771 , 23 L.Ed.2d 237 ; United States v. Ulan, 2 Cir., 1970, 421 F.2d 787 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. William J. O'connell, United States of America v. Richard Crossman
Moreover, there was “some degree of pres *650 ently applied force.” See United States v. Hightower, 512 F.2d 60, 61 (5th Cir.1975); compare United States v. Cunningham, 509 F.2d 961, 963 (D.C.Cir.1975) (per curiam) (presently applied force needed), with United States v. Bamberger, 452 F.2d 696, 699 (2d Cir.1971) (threat of present force sufficient), ce rt. denied, 405 U.S. 1043 , 92 S.Ct. 1326 , 31 L.Ed.2d 585 (1972), and Burke v. United States, 400 F.2d 866, 868 (5th Cir. 1968) (same), cert. denied, 395 U.S. 919 , 89 S.Ct. 1771 , 23 L.Ed.2d 237 (1969).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Nebenzal
v.
Re [now Sutton]
v.
Re [now Sutton]
No. 1242.
Supreme Court of the United States.
May 26, 1969.
Henry J. Clay, Franklin P. Gould, and Pieter J. Kooiman for petitioner. Solicitor General Griswold, Assistant Attorney General Ruckelshaus, and Alan S. Rosenthal for respondents.
Published
C. A. D. C. Cir. Certiorari denied.