Exton Drive-In, Inc. v. Home Indem. Co., 400 U.S. 819 (1970). · Go Syfert
Exton Drive-In, Inc. v. Home Indem. Co., 400 U.S. 819 (1970). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
83 citation events (2 in the last 25 years) across 29 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: ESI Enterprises, Inc. v. Joseph B. Dahlkemper Co. (In Re Joseph B. Dahlkemper Co.) (pawb, 1994-03-21)
Treatment trajectory · 1971 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1971 1998 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 6 distinct citers. How cited ↗
cited Cited "see" ESI Enterprises, Inc. v. Joseph B. Dahlkemper Co. (In Re Joseph B. Dahlkemper Co.)
Bankr. W.D. Pa. · 1994 · signal: see · confidence high
See Exton Drive-In, Inc. v. Home Indemnity Co., 436 Pa. 480, 488 , 261 A.2d 319, 324 (1969), cert. denied, 400 U.S. 819 , 91 S.Ct. 36 , 27 L.Ed.2d 46 (1970).
discussed Cited "see" Kasemer v. National Fuel Gas Distribution Corp. (2×)
Pa. Super. Ct. · 1980 · signal: see · confidence high
See Exton Drive-In, Inc. v. Home Indemnity Co., 436 Pa. 480 , 261 A.2d 319 (1969), cert. den., 400 U.S. 819 , 91 S.Ct. 36 , 27 L.Ed.2d 46 (1970); Pines Plaza Bowling Inc. v. Rossview Inc., 394 Pa. 124 , 145 A.2d 672 (1958); Pollock v. Morelli, 245 Pa.Super. 388 , 369 A.2d 458 (1976).
discussed Cited "see" State v. Spates
Conn. · 1978 · signal: see · confidence high
State v. Tomassi, 137 Conn. 113, 119 , 75 A.2d 67 ; see Perkins, Criminal Law (2d Ed.), Causation, § 9, pp. 732 et seq. 4 For example, in People v. Stamp, 2 Cal. App. 3d 203, 82 Cal. Rptr. 598 , cert. denied, 400 U.S. 819 , 91 S. Ct. 36 , 27 L.
cited Cited "see" United States v. H. Barry Ressler and Oscar M. Williams
5th Cir. · 1978 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Moyer, 308 F.Supp. 754 (W.D.Pa.1968), aff’d per curiam, 420 F.2d 375 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 400 U.S. 819 , 91 S.Ct. 36 , 27 L.Ed.2d 46 (1970).
discussed Cited "see" Consolidated Pacific Engineering, Inc. v. Greater Anchorage Area Borough (2×)
Alaska · 1977 · signal: accord · confidence high
Chariot Textiles Corp. v. Wannalancit Textile Co., 18 N.Y.2d 793 , 275 N.Y.S.2d 382 , 221 N.E.2d 913 (1966), adopting the dissenting opinion below, 21 A.D.2d 762 , 250 N.Y.S.2d 493, 494-95 (1964); accord, In Re Vigo Steamship Corp., 26 N.Y.2d 157 , 309 N.Y.S.2d 165 , 257 N.E.2d 624 , cert. denied, 400 U.S. 819 , 91 S.Ct. 36 , 27 L.Ed.2d 46 (1970).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Keating v. Superior Court (2×)
Cal. · 1982 · signal: see also · confidence low
New York courts take the position that "jurisdiction to enforce contracts to arbitrate imports power to regulate the method of enforcement." ( Chariot Textiles Corp. v. Wannalancit Textile Co. (1964) 21 App. Div.2d 762 [ 250 N.Y.S.2d 493, 495 ] (dis. opn.), revd. on dis. opn. (1966) 18 N.Y.2d 793 [ 275 N.Y.S.2d 382 , 221 N.E.2d 913 ]; see also In re Vigo Steamship Corporation (1970) 26 N.Y.2d 157 [ 309 N.Y.S.2d 165 , 257 N.E.2d 624 ], cert. den. sub nom., Frederick Snare Corp. v. Vigo Steamship Corp. (1970) 400 U.S. 819 [ 27 L.Ed.2d 46 , 91 S.Ct. 36 ]; accord: Grover-Dimond Assoc. v. American …
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Exton Drive-In, Inc.
v.
Home Indemnity Co.
No. 167.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 12, 1970.
400 U.S. 819
Published

Sup. Ct. Pa. Certiorari denied.