R.F. v. M.M. (N.D. 2010). · Go Syfert
R.F. v. M.M. (N.D. 2010). Book View Copy Cite
21 citation events (21 in the last 25 years) across 3 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Estate of Swift v. Bullington (nm, 2013-08-29)
Treatment trajectory · 2010 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2010 2018 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 7 distinct citers. How cited ↗
cited Cited as authority (rule) Estate of Swift v. Bullington
N.M. · 2013 · confidence medium
R.F., 2010 ND 195, ¶¶ 6, 13 .
cited Cited as authority (rule) Swift v. Bullington
N.M. Ct. App. · 2013 · confidence medium
R.F., 2010 ND 195, ¶¶ 6, 13 .
cited Cited as authority (rule) Swift v. Bullington
N.M. Ct. App. · 2013 · confidence medium
R.F., 2010 ND 195, ¶¶ 6, 13 .
discussed Cited as authority (rule) D.E. v. K.F.
N.D. · 2012 · confidence medium
(Emphasis added.) See R.F. v. M.M., 2010 ND 195, ¶¶ 6, 13 , 789 N.W.2d 723 (stating “[standing is a question of law, which we review de novo on appeal” and holding grandparent appointed personal representative of son’s estate had standing to bring paternity action on deceased son’s behalf).
discussed Cited as authority (rule) State v. Wolfgram
N.D. · 2012 · confidence medium
(Emphasis added.) See R.F. v. M.M. , 2010 ND 195, ¶¶ 6, 13 , 789 N.W.2d 723 (stating “[s]tanding is a question of law, which we review de novo on appeal” and holding grandparent appointed personal representative of son’s estate had standing to bring paternity action on deceased son’s behalf).
discussed Cited "see" In re S.B. (2×)
N.D. · 2014 · signal: see · confidence high
See R.F. v. M.M. , 2010 ND 195, ¶ 26 , 789 N.W.2d 723 (“The mother . . . claims the district court’s decision here is not consistent with Troxel because the court substituted its judgment on how to raise the child.
discussed Cited "see" Bjerke v. Bjerke (2×)
N.D. · 2014 · signal: see · confidence high
See R.F. v. M.M., 2010 ND 195, ¶ 26 , 789 N.W.2d 723 (“The mother ... claims the district court’s decision here is not consistent with Troxel because the court substituted its judgment on how to raise the child.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
R.F.
v.
M.M.
20100046.
North Dakota Supreme Court.
Oct 19, 2010.
Cited by 10 opinions  |  Published

Filed 10/19/10 by Clerk of Supreme Court

IN THE SUPREME COURT

STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA

2010 ND 192

In the Interest of D.V.A.

Cynthia M. Feland, Plaintiff and Appellee

v.

D.V.A., Respondent and Appellant

No. 20100091

Appeal from the District Court of Burleigh County, South Central Judicial District, the Honorable Bruce A. Romanick, Judge.

AFFIRMED.

Per Curiam.

Cynthia Mae Feland (appeared), Assistant State’s Attorney, and Jordan J. Evert (argued), third-year law student, under the Rule on Limited Practice of Law by Law Students, 514 East Thayer Avenue, Bismarck, N.D. 58501-4413, for plaintiff and appellee.

Kent M. Morrow, P.O. Box 2155, Bismarck, N.D. 58502-2155, for respondent and appellant.

Interest of D.V.A.

No. 20100091

Per Curiam.

[¶1] D.V.A. appeals from a district court order continuing his commitment as a sexually dangerous individual.   See In the Matter of D.V.A. , 2009 ND 75, 764 N.W.2d 417; In the Interest of D.V.A. , 2004 ND 57, 676 N.W.2d 776.  He argues the district court’s order violated his right to the least restrictive available treatment program or facility under N.D.C.C. § 25-03.3-13 and the court erred when it failed to consider any least restrictive treatment programs for him.  We affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2) and (7) and In the Interest of P.F. , 2008 ND 37, 744 N.W.2d 724.

[¶2] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.

Dale V. Sandstrom

Daniel J. Crothers

Mary Muehlen Maring

Carol Ronning Kapsner