Wachovia Bank & Trust Co. v. Harris, 409 U.S. 844 (1972). · Go Syfert
Search
Wachovia Bank & Trust Co. v. Harris, 409 U.S. 844 (1972). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
21 citation events across 18 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: In Re Byrne (fla, 1981-06-25) · Strongest negative: Matter of Lomax (dc, 1977-04-19)
Treatment trajectory · 1975 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1975 2000 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 6 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "but see" Matter of Lomax (2×)
D.C. · 1977 · signal: but see · confidence high
Hawks v. Lazaro, 202 S.E.2d 109, 123 (W.Va.1974) ; but see Fhagen v. Miller, 29 N.Y.2d 348 , 328 N.Y.S. 2d 393 , 278 N.E.2d 615 , cert, denied, 409 U.S. 845 , 93 S.Ct. 47 , 34 L.Ed.2d 85 (1972).
discussed Cited "but see" State v. Krol
N.J. · 1975 · signal: but cf. · confidence high
But cf. Fhagen v. Miller, 29 N.Y. 2d 348 , 328 N.Y.S. 2d 393 , 278 N.E. 2d 615 (Ct. App. 1972) cert. denied 409 U.S. 845 , 93 S.Ct. 47 , 34 L.Ed.2d 85 (1972). [4] It should be noted that this factual assumption has not gone undisputed in the literature.
cited Cited "see" In Re Byrne
Fla. · 1981 · signal: see · confidence high
See Fhagen v. Miller, 29 N.Y.2d 348 , 328 N.Y.S.2d 393 , 278 N.E.2d 615 , cert. denied, 409 U.S. 845 , 93 S.Ct. 47 , 34 L.Ed.2d 85 (1972).
cited Cited "see" State Ex Rel. Doe v. Madonna
Minn. · 1980 · signal: see · confidence high
See, Fhagen v. Miller, 29 N.Y.2d 348 , 328 N.Y.S.2d 393 , 278 N.E.2d 615 , certiorari denied, 409 U.S. 845 , 93 S.Ct. 47 , 34 L.Ed.2d 85 (1972).
discussed Cited "see" Mignone v. Vincent
S.D.N.Y. · 1976 · signal: see · confidence high
See Fhagen v. Miller, 29 N.Y.2d 348 , 328 N.Y.S.2d 393 , 278 N.E.2d 615 , cert. denied, 409 U.S. 845 , 93 S.Ct. 47 , 34 L.Ed.2d 85 (1972); Suzuki v. Quisenberry, 411 F.Supp. 1113 , 44 U.S.L.W. 2422 (D.Haw.1976); Bell v. Wayne County General Hospital, 384 F.Supp. 1085 (E.D.Mich.1974); Lessard v. Schmidt, 349 F.Supp. 1078, 1091 (E.D.Wis.1972), vacated on other grounds, 414 U.S. 473 , 94 S.Ct. 713 , 38 L.Ed.2d 661 (1974), 421 U.S. 957 , 95 S.Ct. 1943 , 44 L.Ed.2d 445 (1975); Logan v. Arafeh, 346 F.Supp. 1265 (D.Conn.1972), aff’d, 411 U.S. 911 , 93 S.Ct. 1556 , 36 L.Ed.2d 304 (1973).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." In Re Hollanger
Bankr. W.D. La. · 1981 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e. g., Wachovia Bank & Trust Co. v. Harris, 455 F.2d 841 (4th Cir.), cert. denied 409 U.S. 844 , 93 S.Ct. 47 , 34 L.Ed.2d 84 (1972); In re Benson, supra. Essentially, the purpose of any reorganization (or rehabilitation) proceeding is to preserve the assets of a debtor and save them from disasterous or premature sales, such as foreclosures, so that junior interests (such as junior mortgage holders, unsecured creditors, and the debtors) will receive the greatest possibility of preserving their rights to recovery/equity in the debtor’s property.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Wachovia Bank & Trust Co.
v.
Harris, Trustee
No. 71-1488.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 10, 1972.
409 U.S. 844
Cited by 1 opinion  |  Published

C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.