green
Positive treatment
0.2 score
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "but see"
Long Island Trust Company v. Dicker
But see, Howard v. Allen, 30 Ohio St.2d 130 , 283 N.E.2d 167 , appeal dismissed, 409 U.S. 908 , 93 S.Ct. 251 , 34 L.Ed.2d 169 (1972) (holding Ohio's savings statute inapplicable to an action filed in sister state). 13 Dicker's reliance on Scurlock Oil Co. v. Three States Contracting Co., 272 F.2d 169 (5th Cir. 1959), and Rigo Manufacturing Co. v. Thomas, 458 S.W.2d 180 (Tex.1970), as authority for the proposition that the Texas savings statute is inapplicable to this action originally filed in New York is misplaced.
discussed
Cited "but see"
Long Island Trust Co. v. Dicker
But see, Howard v. Allen, 30 Ohio St.2d 130 , 283 N.E.2d 167 , appeal dismissed, 409 U.S. 908 , 93 S.Ct. 251 , 34 L.Ed.2d 169 (1972) (holding Ohio’s sav- ings statute inapplicable to an action filed in sister state). .
discussed
Cited "see"
Hartford Accident and Indemnity Co. v. Baker
Accord, Andrew v. Bendix Corp., 452 F. 2d 961 (6th Cir.1971), cert. den., 406 U.S. 920 , 92 S.Ct. 1773 , 32 L.Ed. 2d 119 (1971); see Howard v. Allen, 30 Ohio St. 2d 130 , 283 N.E. 2d 167 app. dism., 409 U.S. 908 , 93 S.Ct. 251 , 34 L.Ed. 2d 169 (1972); State v. Pearcy, 401 F. Supp. 994 (W.D.W.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Salazar
v.
New Mexico
v.
New Mexico
No. 72-5130.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 16, 1972.
Published
C. A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied.