discussed Cited as authority (rule) Hutchins, Reginald Kelly, 204 [*6] instructed that we frame the issue as: ″Could a rational S.W.3d at 818. trier of fact conclude, by clear and convincing evidence (less than beyond a reasonable doubt), based upon all of the A search conducted without a warrant based on probable facts and logical inferences that can be drawn from those cause is per se unreasonable, ″subject to only a few facts, and in the light most favorable to the prosecution, that specifically established and well-delineated exceptions.″ [the appellant] voluntarily consented to the search?″ Id. at Schneckloth v. Bustamonte, 412 U.S. 2…

discussed Cited "see" In re Boston & Maine Corp. See In re Tennessee Central Railway Company, 463 F.2d 73 (6th Cir.), rehearing en banc denied, cert. denied, 409 U.S. 893 , 93 S.Ct. 122 , 34 L.Ed.2d 150 , rehearing denied, 409 U.S. 1029 , 93 S.Ct. 459 , 34 L.Ed.2d 323 (1972). .

discussed Cited "see" United States v. Isaac States, United States of America v. Michael McCoy United States of America v. Robert Morgan (2×) See United States v. Edwards, 458 F.2d 875 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 1029 , 93 S. Ct. 459 , 34 L.Ed.2d 323 (1972) (divorce mill granting decrees of questionable validity); Shushan v. United States, supra (bribery of public officials); Abbott v. United States, supra (bribery of oil company employee to gain company's geophysical maps); Horman v. United States, 116 F. 350 , 53 C.C.A. 570 , cert. denied, 187 U.S. 641 , 23 S.Ct. 841 , 47 L.