green
Positive treatment
1.8 score
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "see"
Hamich, Inc. v. State Ex Rel. Clayburgh
See Handlery v. Franchise Tax Board, 26 Cal. App.3d 970 , 103 CaLRptr. 465, 474 (1972), appeal dismissed, 410 U.S. 921 , 93 S.Ct. 1373 , 35 L.Ed.2d 582 (1973).
discussed
Cited "see"
Bay Ridge Diagnostic Laboratory, Inc. v. Dumpson
See Aguayo v. Richardson, 352 F.Supp. 462 (S.D.N.Y.), modified on other grounds, 473 F.2d 1090 , stay denied, 410 U.S. 921 , 93 S.Ct. 1350 , 35 L.Ed.2d 583 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 1146 , 94 S.Ct. 900 , 39 L.Ed.2d 101 (1972); California Welfare Rights Organization v. Richardson, 348 F.Supp. 491 (N.D.Cal.1972).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Handlery, Trustee
v.
California Franchise Tax Board
v.
California Franchise Tax Board
No. 72-931.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Feb 20, 1973.
Cited by 1 opinion | Published
Appeal from Ct. App. Cal., 1st App. Dist., dismissed for want of substantial federal question.