green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 2×
5.5 score
G Cite
cited 5× by 2 distinct cases ·
“arguably”
Treatment trajectory · 1973 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1973
1999
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 8 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Chicago and Northwestern Transportation Company v. United Transportation Union
arguably
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
United Transportation Union v. Penn Central Transportation Company
arguably
discussed
Cited "see"
Air Line Pilots Ass'n, International v. Eastern Air Lines, Inc.
See International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers v. Washington Terminal Co., 473 F.2d 1156 (D.C.Cir.1972) cert. denied, 411 U.S. 906 , 93 S.Ct. 1530 , 36 L.Ed.2d 195 (1973); Delaware & Hudson Ry. v. United Transp.
discussed
Cited "see"
Murmur Corp. v. BD. OF ADJ., CITY OF DALLAS
(2×)
See City of University Park v. Benners, 485 S.W.2d 773, 777 (Tex.1972), appeal dismissed, 411 U.S. 901 , 93 S.Ct. 1530 , 36 L.Ed.2d 191 (1973).
discussed
Cited "see"
O'donnell v. Wien Air Alaska
See especially International Bhd. of Electrical Workers v. Washington Terminal Co., 154 U.S.App.D.C. 119 , 473 F.2d 1156, 1172-73, n. 37 (1972), cert. denied, 411 U.S. 906 , 93 S.Ct. 1530 , 36 L.Ed.2d 195 (1973) ("where the dispute is even arguably a minor one (the adjustment board) should have the first opportunity to evaluate and decide it"); Local 1477 United Trans.
discussed
Cited "see"
O'Donnell v. Wien Air Alaska, Inc.
See especially International Bhd. of Electrical Workers v. Washington Terminal Co., 154 U.S.App.D.C. 119 , 473 F.2d 1156, 1172-73, n. 37 (1972), cert. denied, 411 U.S. 906 , 93 S.Ct. 1530 , 36 L.Ed.2d 195 (1973) (“where the dispute is even arguably a minor one [the adjustment board] should have the first opportunity to evaluate and decide it”); Local 1477 United Trans.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Jack Roberts, United States of America v. Charles Bishop Smith, United States of America v. Jerome Leavitt and Norman Shabas, United States of America v. Michael Posner
See United States v. Healy, 376 U.S. 75, 77-80 , 84 S.Ct. 553 , 11 L.Ed.2d 527 3 The internal Justice Department procedure followed here is set forth in United States v. Pisacano, 459 F.2d 259, 263 (2d Cir. 1972), and United States v. Giordano, 469 F.2d 522, 525-526 (4th Cir. 1972), certiorari granted 411 U.S. 905 , 93 S.Ct. 1530 , 36 L.Ed.2d 194 4 See also United States v. Robinson, 468 F.2d 189 (5th Cir. 1972), remanded for an evidentiary hearing to determine whether the wiretap applications were properly authorized under 18 U.S.C.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Alphonse Cirillo
See also United States v. Giordano, 469 F.2d 522 (4th Cir. 1972), cert. granted, 411 U.S. 905 , 93 S.Ct. 1530 , 36 L.Ed.2d 194 (1973).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Binkowski
v.
Miller
v.
Miller
No. 72-1070.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Mar 26, 1973.
Published
Citer courts: Third Circuit (1) · Seventh Circuit (1)
Affirmed on appeal from D. C. E. D. Mich.