Ohio Cas. Grp. v. Parrish, 414 U.S. 828 (1973). · Go Syfert
Ohio Cas. Grp. v. Parrish, 414 U.S. 828 (1973). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
38 citation events across 16 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: State v. Jacobson (arizctapp, 1978-09-26)
Treatment trajectory · 1974 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1974 2000 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 5 distinct citers. How cited ↗
cited Cited "see" State v. Jacobson
Ariz. Ct. App. · 1978 · signal: see · confidence high
See City of Escondido v. Desert Outdoor Advertising, Inc., 8 Cal.3d 785 , 505 P.2d 1012 , 106 Cal.Rptr. 172 , *69 cert, denied, 414 U.S. 828 , 94 S.Ct. 53 , 38 L.Ed.2d 62 (1973).
cited Cited "see" United States v. Jerome Dimuro, United States of America v. Roland Lung, United States of America v. Victor Santarpio, United States of America v. Joseph Doherty and Thomas Hurley
1st Cir. · 1976 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. McCoy, 478 F.2d 176, 179 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 828 , 94 S.Ct. 53 , 38 L.Ed.2d 62 (1973); United States v. DeCesaro, 502 F.2d 604 , 607 n.6 (7th Cir. 1974).
cited Cited "see" United States v. DiMuro
10th Cir. · 1976 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. McCoy, 478 F.2d 176, 179 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 828 , 94 S.Ct. 53 , 38 L.Ed.2d 62 (1973); United States v. DeCesaro, 502 F.2d 604 , 607 n.6 (7th Cir. 1974).
discussed Cited "see" State v. Birkestrand
Iowa · 1976 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. McCoy, 478 F.2d 176, 179 (10th Cir. 1973), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 828 , 94 S.Ct. 53 , 38 L.Ed.2d 62 (1973); United States v. Kleve, 465 F.2d 187, 192 (8th Cir. 1972); State v. Everett, 214 N.W.2d at 217 ; State v. Dodson, 195 N.W.2d 684, 685 (Iowa 1972).
discussed Cited "see" CEEED v. California Coastal Zone Conservation Commission
Cal. Ct. App. · 1974 · signal: see · confidence high
See City of Escondido v. Desert Outdoor Advertising, Inc., 8 Cal.3d 785, 790 [ 106 Cal.Rptr. 172 , 505 P.2d 1012 ] [cert. den., 414 U.S. 828 ( 38 L.Ed.2d 62 , 94 S.Ct. 53 )].) Though they do not contend that the state is subject to the State Zoning Law, plaintiffs argue that the cited cases stand for the proposition that the minimum procedural standards therein prescribed are mandated by the due process clause.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Ohio Casualty Group
v.
Parrish
No. 72-1635.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 9, 1973.
414 U.S. 828
Published

Dist. Ct. App. Fla., 3d Dist. Certiorari denied.