Kosky v. Ohio, 414 U.S. 844 (1973). · Go Syfert
Search
Kosky v. Ohio, 414 U.S. 844 (1973). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
75 citation events (2 in the last 25 years) across 26 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Henry Brown v. Richard L. Dugger, as Secretary, Department of Corrections, State of Florida (ca11, 1987-11-13) · Strongest negative: United States v. Feola (nysd, 1987-01-12)
Treatment trajectory · 1974 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1974 2000 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 12 distinct citers. How cited ↗
cited Cited "but see" United States v. Feola
S.D.N.Y. · 1987 · signal: but see · confidence high
But see contra, United States v. Puco, 476 F.2d 1099 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 844 , 94 S.Ct. 106 , 38 L.Ed.2d 82 (1973), decided prior to the adoption of the Federal Rules of Evidence.
discussed Cited "see" Henry Brown v. Richard L. Dugger, as Secretary, Department of Corrections, State of Florida (2×)
11th Cir. · 1987 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Puco, 453 F.2d 539 , 541 n. 4 (2nd Cir.1971), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 844 , 94 S.Ct. 106 , 38 L.Ed.2d 82 (1973).
cited Cited "see" United States v. George G. Davis
2d Cir. · 1985 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Puco, 476 F.2d 1099 , 1104 n. 8 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 844 , 94 S.Ct. 106 , 38 L.Ed.2d 82 (1973).
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Jessie Oliver and Gregory Cooper
2d Cir. · 1980 · signal: see · confidence high
See, in accord, United States v. Puco, 476 F.2d 1099, 1103 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 844 , 94 S.Ct. 106 , 38 L.Ed.2d 82 (1973), permitting an exception to the right of cross-examination where “the statement is clearly trustworthy and is not ‘crucial’ to the prosecution or ‘devastating’ to the defendant.” Oliver’s post-conspiracy statement clearly does not meet these standards for the narrow exception to the confrontation requirement.
cited Cited "see" United States v. Orlando Delli Paoli, Richard Warme, and Victor Isaza
2d Cir. · 1979 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Puco, 476 F.2d 1099, 1107 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 844 , 94 S.Ct. 106 , 38 L.Ed.2d 82 (1973).
discussed Cited "see" State v. Jones
Iowa · 1978 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Puco, 453 F.2d 539 , 541 n.6 (2d Cir. 1971), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 844 , 94 S.Ct. 106 , 38 L.Ed.2d 82 (1973); United States v. Yarbrough, 352 F.2d 491, 493 (6th Cir. 1965); United States v. Vanco, 131 F.2d 123, 125-26 (7th Cir. 1942); Eubanks v. State, 516 P.2d 726, 730 (Alaska 1973); Nicholas v. State, 49 Wis.2d 683, 687-91 , 183 N.W.2d 11, 14-16 (1971).
discussed Cited "see" Pa. Tavern Ass'n v. Com., Liq. Control Bd. (2×)
Pa. · 1977 · signal: see · confidence high
See, Porter v. Bloomsburg State College, 450 Pa. 375 , 301 A.2d 621 , cert. denied, 414 U.S. 844 , 94 S.Ct. 105 , 38 L.Ed.2d 82 (1973).
discussed Cited "see" United States v. George Samuel Walter Rogers (2×)
8th Cir. · 1976 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Puco, 476 F.2d 1099, 1103-04 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 844 , 94 S.Ct. 106 , 38 L.Ed.2d 82 (1973); United States v. Adams, 446 F.2d 681, 684 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 404 U.S. 943 , 92 S.Ct. 294 , 30 L.Ed.2d 257 (1971).
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Kelley (2×)
8th Cir. · 1975 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Puco, 476 F.2d 1099, 1104 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 844 , 94 S.Ct. 106 , 38 L.Ed.2d 82 (1973).
discussed Cited "see" A. C. Park v. H. T. (Tommy) Huff (2×)
5th Cir. · 1974 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Puco, 2 Cir. 1973, 476 F.2d 1099 , rehearing en banc denied, id. at 1111 , cert. denied, 414 U.S. 844 , 94 S.Ct. 106 , 38 L.Ed.2d 82 .
cited Cited "see, e.g." State v. Farber
Or. Ct. App. · 1982 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., United States v. Puco, 476 F2d 1099 (2d Cir), cert den 414 US 844 (1973); United States v. Nick, 604 F2d 1199 (9th Cir 1979).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." People v. H.
N.Y. Sup. Ct. · 1982 · signal: compare · confidence low
In sum, the facts considered as a whole justified introduction of Kleinman’s alleged statements to Gruskin as not in violation of the right of confrontation (see, also, United States v Winley, 638 F2d 560, 563 [admission in evidence of pleas of guilty of defendant’s alleged coconspirators hs- declarations against interest, to establish the conspiracy, did not violate Sixth Amendment]; United States v White, 553 F2d 310, cert den 431 US 972 [statement by arrested accomplice, same result]; compare United States v Puco, 476 F2d 1099, 1104, 1107, cert den 414 US 844 ).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Kosky
v.
Ohio
No. 72-6797.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 9, 1973.
414 U.S. 844
Published

Ct. App. Ohio, Cuyahoga County. Certiorari denied.