green
Positive treatment
3.0 score
Treatment trajectory · 1974 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1974
2000
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 6 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Daoust
See United States v. Gervato, 474 F.2d 40, 43 (3d Cir.) (forcible entry of apartment after knocking and announcing identity and purpose, despite known absence of tenant), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 864 , 94 S.Ct. 39 , 38 L.Ed.2d 84 (1973).
cited
Cited "see"
In re United States
See United States v. Gervato, 474 F.2d 40, 45 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 864 , 94 S.Ct. 39 , 38 L.Ed.2d 84 (1973).
cited
Cited "see"
In the Matter of the Application of the United States of America for an Order Authorizing the Installation of a Pen Register or Touch-Tone Decoder and a Terminating Trap. Appeal of Bell Telephone Company of Pennsylvania. In the Matter of the Application of the United States of America for an Orderauthorizing the Installation of a Pen Register or a Touch-Tone Decoder Andtermination Trap Facilities. Appeal of Bell Telephone Company of Pennsylvania. In the Matter of the Application of the United States for an Order Authorizinga Telephone Tracer. Appeal of New Jersey Bell Telephone Company
See United States v. Gervato, 474 F.2d 40, 45 (3d Cir.), Cert. denied, 414 U.S. 864 , 94 S.Ct. 39 , 38 L.Ed.2d 84 (1973).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Salvatore Finazzo, Dominic J. Licavoli
See Blackmar v. Nickerson, 188 Mass. 399 , 74 N.E. 932 (1905) (unreasonable for officer to break into a locked safe in absence of owner rather than awaiting owner's return) 36 United States v. Gervato, 340 F.Supp. 454 (E.D.Pa.1972), rev'd 474 F.2d 40 (3rd Cir.), Cert. denied, 414 U.S. 864 , 94 S.Ct. 39 , 38 L.Ed.2d 84 (1973) 37 Sabbath v. United States, 391 U.S. 585, 588 , 88 S.Ct. 1755 , 20 L.Ed.2d 828 (1968) 38 389 U.S. 347, 351 , 88 S.Ct. 507 , 19 L.Ed.2d 576 (1967) 39 United States v. Chadwick, 433 U.S. 1 , 11 n. 6, 97 S.Ct. 2476 , 53 L.Ed.2d 538 (1977) 40 United States v. United States Di…
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Dalia
See United States v. Bustamante-Gamez, 488 F.2d 4 , 11 — 12 (9th Cir. 1973), cert. denied, 416 U.S. 970 , 94 S.Ct. 1993 , 40 L.Ed.2d 559 (1974). *866 In United States v. Gervato, 474 F.2d 40 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 864 , 94 S.Ct. 39 , 38 L.Ed.2d 84 (1973), the court held that there is also no requirement that the premises be occupied at the time of a search.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Davis v. State
See, e.g., United States v. Brown, 556 F.2d 304, 305 (C.A.5 1977), United States v. Gervato, 474 F.2d 40, 41 (C.A.3), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 864 , 94 S.Ct. 39 , 38 L.Ed.2d 84 (1973)) “It would extend the Warrant Clause to the extreme to require that, whenever it is reasonably likely that Fourth Amendment rights may be affected in more than one way, *425 the court must set forth precisely the procedures to be followed by the executing officers.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Gervato
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 72-1307.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 9, 1973.
Certiorari.
Published
C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.
Mr. Justice Douglas would grant certiorari.