Bogart v. State Bar of California, 415 U.S. 903 (1974). · Go Syfert
Search
Bogart v. State Bar of California, 415 U.S. 903 (1974). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
42 citation events (5 in the last 25 years) across 19 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Aronson Associates, Inc. v. Pennsylvania National Mutual Casualty Insurance (pactcompldauphi, 1977-12-19)
Treatment trajectory · 1974 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1974 2000 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 4 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" Aronson Associates, Inc. v. Pennsylvania National Mutual Casualty Insurance
pactcompldauphi · 1977 · signal: see · confidence high
See, generally, Pittsburgh Coal Company v. Sanitary Water Board, 4 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 407 , 286 A. 2d 459 (1972), reversed on other grounds 452 Pa. 77 , 306 A. 2d 308 (1973), appeal dismissed 415 U.S. 903 (1974).
cited Cited "see, e.g." Gemmill v. Riccio
D. Maryland · 2022 · signal: compare · confidence low
Compare id. ¶ 2 with ECF 3 ¶ 1.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Matter of Discipline of Tieso
Minn. · 1986 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also In re Phelps, 55 Ill.2d 319 , 303 N.E.2d 13 (1973) (violation of disciplinary rules where attorney filed “frivolous, untrue, defamatory and scurrilous” petitions for review in state court and federal court accusing the courts of conspiring to deprive her brother of constitutional rights), appeal dismissed, 415 U.S. 903 (1974).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Attorney Grievance Commission v. Reamer
Md. · 1977 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., In re Bogart, 9 Cal. 3d 743 , 511 P. 2d 1167 , 108 Cal. Rptr. 815 (1973), appeal dismissed, 415 U. S. 903 (1974); In re Collins, 188 Cal. 701 , 206 P. 990 (1922); Florida Bar v. Craig, 238 So. 2d 78 (Fla. 1970); In re Bloor, 21 Mont. 49 , 52 P. 779 (1898).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Bogart
v.
State Bar of California
No. 73-940.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Feb 19, 1974.
415 U.S. 903
Cited by 2 opinions  |  Published

Appeal from Sup. Ct. Cal. dismissed for want of substantial federal question.