discussed Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Taylor See, e.g., Mandina v. United States, 472 F.2d 1110, 1113 (8th Cir.) (“We cannot say that Congress did not have a rational basis for its findings that the firearms and ammunition traffic has a substantial affect upon commerce or that the means selected to combat the object of its concern was inappropriate or unreasonable”), cert. denied, 412 U.S. 907 , 93 S.Ct. 2299 , 36 L.Ed.2d 972 (1973); United States v. Day, 476 F.2d 562, 566-67 (6th Cir.1973) (noting that legislative history “reveals detailed findings of the interrelationship between the business of selling guns and interstate crime …

discussed Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Panetta See, e. g., United States v. Hombeck, 489 F.2d 1325 (7th Cir. 1973), cert. denied 416 U.S. 907 , 94 S.Ct. 1614 , 40 L.Ed.2d 112 (1974); United States v. Petrucci, 486 F.2d 329 (9th Cir. 1973), cert. denied, 416 U.S. 937 , 94 S.Ct. 1937 , 40 L.Ed.2d 287 (1974); Mandina v. United States, 472 F.2d 1110 (8th Cir.) cert. denied, 412 U.S. 907 , 93 S.Ct. 2299 , 36 L.Ed.2d 972 (1973).