green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 3×
7.1 score
“activities within a regulated class of activities which do not exceed the reach of the federal power under the commerce clause need not be shown, in each individual ease, to affect interstate commerce”
Treatment trajectory · 1974 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1974
2000
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 19 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "but see"
United States v. Lewis K. Tarter
But see United States v. Smaldone, 485 F.2d 1333, 1351 (10th Cir. 1973), cert. denied, 416 U.S. 936 , 94 S.Ct. 1934 , 40 L.Ed.2d 286 (1974).
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
United States v. Ornelas
activities within a regulated class of activities which do not exceed the reach of the federal power under the commerce clause need not be shown, in each individual ease, to affect interstate commerce
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Preservation Coalition, Inc. v. Pierce
environmental clearance
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Preservation Coalition, Inc. v. Pierce
environmental clearance
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Manuel Mendoza Torres, Max Candido Griego, Sarah Godoy and Susan Smith Spiegel
See United States v. Smaldone, 485 F.2d 1333, 1350 (10th Cir. 1973), cert. denied, 416 U.S. 936 , 94 S.Ct. 1934 , 40 L.Ed.2d 286 (1974).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. L. D. Morris, United States of America v. Lawrence Lee Jelsma, United States of America v. Randall Lloyd Keef, United States of America v. Jana Jarvis
See United States v. Smaldone, 485 F.2d 1333 , 1339 n.3, 1351 (10th Cir.), Cert. denied, 416 U.S. 936 , 94 S.Ct. 1934 , 40 L.Ed.2d 286 .
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Morris
See United States v. Smaldone, 485 F.2d 1333 , 1339 n.3, 1351 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 416 U.S. 936 , 94 S.Ct. 1934 , 40 L.Ed.2d 286 .
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. David B. Morrison
See United States v. Smaldone, 485 F.2d 1333, 1343 (10th Cir. 1973), cert. denied, 416 U.S. 936 , 94 S.Ct. 1934 , 40 L.Ed.2d 286 (1974); United States v. Palmer, 465 F.2d 697, 699 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 874 , 93 S.Ct. 119 , 34 L.Ed.2d 126 , rehearing denied, 409 U.S. 1051 , 93 S.Ct. 513 , 34 L.Ed.2d 505 (1972).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Marrifield
See United States v. Smaldone, 10 Cir. 1973, 485 F.2d 1333, 1351 , cert. denied 1974, 416 U.S. 936 , 94 S.Ct. 1934 , 40 L.Ed.2d 286 .
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Marrifield
See United States v. Smaldone, 10 Cir. 1973, 485 F.2d 1333, 1351 , cert. denied 1974, 416 U.S. 936 , 94 S.Ct. 1934 , 40 L.Ed.2d 286 .
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Dye Construction Company, a Corporation
See United States v. Smaldone, 485 F.2d 1333 (10th Cir. 1973), cert. denied, 416 U.S. 936 , 94 S.Ct. 1934 , 40 L.Ed. 286 (1974); United States v. Parker, 469 F.2d 884, 889 (10th Cir. 1974); United States v. Burkhart, 458 F.2d 201 (10th Cir. 1972); Holt v. United States, 404 F.2d 914 (10th Cir. 1968), cert. denied, 393 U.S. 1086 , 92 S.Ct. 292 , 30 L.Ed.2d 257 (1968); Rothering v. United States, 384 F.2d 385 (10th Cir. 1967); Morgan v. United States, 355 F.2d 43 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 384 U.S. 1025 , 86 S.Ct. 1976 , 16 L.Ed.2d 1029 (1966); Tandberg-Hanssen v. United States, 284 F.2d 331 (10…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Janus Industries, Doing Business as Acapulco Smoke Shop, and James B. Janus
Additionally, the Supreme Court has emphasized that “[w]here the class of activities is regulated and that class is within the reach of federal power, the courts have no power ‘to excise, as trivial, individual instances’ of the class.” Perez, 402 U.S. at 154 , 91 S.Ct. at 1361 -62 (quoting Maryland v. Wirtz, 392 U.S. 183, 193 , 88 S.Ct. 2017, 2022 , 20 L.Ed.2d 1020 (1968)); see also United States v. Smaldone, 485 F.2d 1333, 1342 (10th Cir.1973) (“[A]etivities within a regulated class of activities which do not exceed the reach of federal power under the Commerce Clause need not be s…
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Jose Rafael Abello-Silva
See also United States v. Smaldone, 485 F.2d 1333, 1345 (10th Cir.1973), cert. denied, 416 U.S. 936 , 94 S.Ct. 1934 , 40 L.Ed.2d 286 (1974).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Ed J. Hagen, Also Known as J. Ewald Martha Jo \Marjo\" Hagen and William C. Hagen
See United States v. Matya, 541 F.2d 741, 748 (8th Cir.1976) (Section 1955 “makes no distinction whatsoever between state felonies and state misdemeanors.”), cer t. denied, 429 U.S. 1091 , 97 S.Ct. 1101 , 51 L.Ed.2d 536 (1977); see also United States v. Smaldone, 485 F.2d 1333, 1344, 1351 (10th Cir.1973) (upholding Section 1955 conviction where state gambling laws violated were labeled misdemeanors), cer t. dismissed, 416 U.S. 917 , 94 S.Ct. 1625 , 40 L.Ed.2d 119 , and cert. denied, 416 U.S. 936 , 94 S.Ct. 1934 , 40 L.Ed.2d 286 (1974).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Solomon Monk, Also Known as David L. Martin v. Colonel Gordon N. Zelez, Commandant
See, e.g., United States v. Smaldone, 485 F.2d 1333, 1348 (10th Cir.1973) (improper “willing to act” language does not require reversal of otherwise unobjectional jury charge), cert. denied, 416 U.S. 936 , 94 S.Ct. 1934 , 40 L.Ed.2d 286 (1974); Darnell v. Swinney, 823 F.2d 299, 302 (9th Cir.1987) (single use of term “substantial doubt” not reversible error), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 1059 , 108 S.Ct. 1012 , 98 L.Ed.2d 978 (1988); Murphy v. Holland, 776 F.2d 470, 477 (4th Cir.1985) (substantial doubt language did not require reversal where court cautioned jury that conviction requires excl…
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Michael H. O'Keefe
See also United States v. Smaldone, 485 F.2d 1333 (10th Cir.1973), cert. denied, 416 U.S. 936 , 94 S.Ct. 1934 , 40 L.Ed.2d 286 (1974).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Como-Falcon Coalition, Inc. v. United States Department of Labor
See also, Hanly v. Kleindienst, 484 F.2d 448 (2d Cir. 1973), cert. denied, 416 U.S. 936 , 94 S.Ct. 1934 , 40 L.Ed.2d 286 (1974).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Eugene Schaefer, United States of America v. Angelo Del Pietro, United States of America v. Frank Vinceri, United States of America v. Clifford Lancaster, United States of America v. James Lonsberry, United States of America v. John Edward Vogt, United States of America v. William Christophel
Brick, supra, 502 F.2d at 224 ; see also United States v. Smaldone, 485 F.2d 1333, 1348 (10th Cir. 1973), cert. denied, 416 U.S. 936 , 94 S.Ct. 1934 , 40 L.Ed.2d 286 (1974); United States v. Iannelli, 477 F.2d 999, 1002 (3rd Cir. 1973), cert. granted, 417 U.S. 907 , 94 S.Ct. 2602 , 41 L.Ed.2d 211 (1974).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Schaefer
Brick, supra, 502 F.2d at 224 ; see also United States v. Smaldone, 485 F.2d 1333, 1348 (10th Cir. 1973), cert. denied, 416 U.S. 936 , 94 S.Ct. 1934 , 40 L.Ed.2d 286 (1974); United States v. Iannelli, 477 F.2d 999, 1002 (3rd Cir. 1973), cert. granted, 417 U.S. 907 , 94 S.Ct. 2602 , 41 L.Ed.2d 211 (1974).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Hanly
v.
Saxbe, Attorney General
v.
Saxbe, Attorney General
No. 73-913.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Apr 15, 1974.
Cited by 2 opinions | Published
Citer courts: Ninth Circuit (2) · D. Colorado (1)
C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.