green
Positive treatment
2.7 score
Treatment trajectory · 1975 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1975
2000
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 4 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Braxton v. State
(2×)
Maryland courts have long recognized that an “[i]dentification by the victim is ample evidence to sustain a conviction.” Branch v. State, 305 Md. 177, 183 , 502 A.2d 496 (1986) (citations omitted); see Mobley and King v. State, 270 Md. 76, 89 , 310 A.2d 803 (1973), cert. denied, 416 U.S. 975 , 94 S.Ct. 2003 , 40 L.Ed.2d 564 (1974); Kirby v. State, 48 Md.App. 205, 211 , 426 A.2d 423 , cert. denied, 291 Md. 777 (1981).
discussed
Cited "see"
Brady v. Blair
(2×)
See Oliver v. Cowan, 487 F.2d 895, 896 (6th Cir. 1973), cert. denied, 416 U.S. 975 , 94 S.Ct. 2003 , 40 L.Ed.2d 564 (1974).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Amarin Plastics, Inc. v. Maryland Cup Corporation D/B/A Sweetheart Products Group
See also United States v. Davis, 487 F.2d 112, 123 (5th Cir.1973), reh’g denied, 486 F.2d 1403 (5th Cir.1973), and cert. denied, 415 U.S. 981 , 94 S.Ct. 1573 , 39 L.Ed.2d 878 (1974), and reh’g denied, 416 U.S. 975 , 94 S.Ct. 2005 , 40 L.Ed.2d 565 (1974) (if the witness asserts as true the contents of a prior statement, the witness in effect adopts the prior statement as his present testimony); 4 Weinstein’s Evidence ¶ 801(d)(l)(A)[02] (an adopted prior statement becomes present testimony); United States v. Klein, 488 F.2d 481, 483 (2d Cir.1973), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 1091 , 95 S.Ct. 68…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Thomas Joseph Carroll
(2×)
Compare Oliver v. Cowan, 487 F.2d 895 (6th Cir. 1973), cert. denied, 416 U.S. 975 , 94 S.Ct. 2003 , 40 L.Ed.2d 564 (1974).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Kentner
v.
Seaboard Coast Line Railroad Co.
v.
Seaboard Coast Line Railroad Co.
No. 73-1372.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Apr 29, 1974.
Certiorari, Consideration, Took.
Published
Dist. Ct. App. Fla., 2d Dist. Certiorari denied.
Mr. Justice Douglas would grant certiorari. Mr. Justice Powell took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.