green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
8.5 score
G Cite
cited 2× by 1 distinct case, last quoted 1981 ·
…hester, failing to apprise the trial court of this alleged misconduct, should not be allowed to inject 'a defect into the trial, and later claim its benefit.
⚠ not in text
Treatment trajectory · 1975 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1975
2000
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 25 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
United States v. Frank Dean
(2×)
hester, failing to apprise the trial court of this alleged misconduct, should not be allowed to inject 'a defect into the trial, and later claim its benefit.
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Aldret
Accord United States v. Nance, 502 F.2d 615 (8th Cir.1974), cert, denied 420 U.S. 926 , 95 S.Ct. 1123 , 43 L.Ed.2d 396 (1975) (noting distinction in cases involving improper instruction encouraging premature deliberations). 5 .
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Wise
Accord U.S. v. McGre-gor, 503 F.2d 1167 (8th Cir.1974), cert, denied, 420 U.S. 926 , 95 S.Ct. 1122 , 43 L.Ed.2d 395 (1975) (use of mails to defraud may be prosecuted in district where communication sent or received).
discussed
Cited "see"
Save Barton Creek Association v. Federal Highway Administration
See Named Individual Members of San Antonio Conservation Soc'y v. Texas Highway Dep't, 496 F.2d 1017, 1024 (5th Cir.1974), cert. denied, 420 U.S. 926 , 95 S.Ct. 1123 , 43 L.Ed.2d 396 (1975) (hereinafter San Antonio (II) ) ("virtually every road in the country crosses or interchanges with federal-aid highways, and ... there are many state-constructed roads which do not form a part of the federal network").
discussed
Cited "see"
Save Barton Creek Ass'n v. Federal Highway Administration
See Named Individual Members of San Antonio Conservation Soc’y v. Texas Highway Dep’t, 496 F.2d 1017, 1024 (5th Cir.1974), cert. denied, 420 U.S. 926 , 95 S.Ct. 1123 , 43 L.Ed.2d 396 (1975) (hereinafter San Antonio (II)) (“virtually every road in the country crosses or interchanges with federal-aid highways, and ... there are many state-constructed roads which do not form a part of the federal network”).
discussed
Cited "see"
Environmental Rights Coalition, Inc. v. Austin
See, Named Individual Members of San Antonio Conservation Society v. Texas Highway Department, 496 F.2d 1017 (5th Cir.1974) (NEPA no longer applied after Congress withdrew funding from what was previously a federally funded project, cert. denied, 420 U.S. 926 , 95 S.Ct. 1123 , 43 L.Ed.2d 396 (1975)); Ely v. Velde, 497 F.2d 252, 257 (4th Cir.1974) (state could avoid injunction under NEPA by returning federal funds); but see Scottsdale Mall, 549 F.2d at 489 (finding that highway project was federal despite the fact that the State of Indiana attempted to withdraw the project from federal funding)…
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Thomas F. Scafe
See United States v. Feinberg, 371 F.Supp. 1205, 1210-11 (N.D.Ill.), aff'd in part, rev’d in part on other grounds, 502 F.2d 1180, 1181 (7th Cir.1974), cert. denied, 420 U.S. 926 , 95 S.Ct. 1122 , 43 L.Ed.2d 396 (1975).
cited
Cited "see"
Clarence Alexander v. Vernon Housewright, Director, Arkansas Department of Correction
See United States v. Minkin, 504 F.2d 350, 355 (8th Cir. 1974), cert. denied, 420 U.S. 926 , 95 S.Ct. 1122 , 43 L.Ed.2d 396 (1975).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Michael A. Pintar, United States of America v. Barbara Pintar
In either case, “[sjince the term ‘scheme to defraud’ connotes some degree of planning by the perpetrator, it is essential that the evidence show the defendant entertained an intent to defraud.” United States v. Brown, 540 F.2d 364, 374 (8th Cir. 1976); see United States v. Nance, 502 F.2d 615, 618 (8th Cir. 1974), cert. denied, 420 U.S. 926 , 95 S.Ct. 1123 , 43 L.Ed.2d 396 (1975).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. James A. Brien, United States of America v. Thomas Labus, United States of America v. Robert Ralph Zolla, United States of America v. Michael Shuster, United States of America v. Stephen Buzzi
See generally United States v. Nance, 502 F.2d 615, 618 (8th Cir. 1974), cert. denied, 420 U.S. 926 , 95 S.Ct. 1123 , 43 L.Ed.2d 396 (1975); United States v. Seasholtz, 435 F.2d 4, 8 (10th Cir. 1970).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Brien
See generally United States v. Nance, 502 F.2d 615, 618 (8th Cir. 1974), cert. denied, 420 U.S. 926 , 95 S.Ct. 1123 , 43 L.Ed.2d 396 (1975); United States v. Seasholtz, 435 F.2d 4, 8 (10th Cir. 1970).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Frank Viserto, Jr., Richard Rocco, Joseph Solce, Garnet Johnson, Sarah Payne, Howard Williams and Prentiss Covington
See United States v. Fein-berg, 502 F.2d 1180,1182-83 (7th Cir. 1974), cert. denied, 420 U.S. 926 , 95 S.Ct. 1122 , 43 L.Ed.2d 396 (1975).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Zack O'Farrell Hastings
See United States v. Nance, 502 F.2d 615, 619-20 (8th Cir. 1974), cert. denied, 420 U.S. 926 , 95 S.Ct. 1123 , 43 L.Ed.2d 396 (1975).
discussed
Cited "see"
T'ai Corporation, a Colorado Corporation v. Kalso Systemet, Inc., a Delaware Corporation
See, International Union of Operating Engineers, Local 953 v. Central National Life Insurance Co., 501 F.2d 902, 907 (10th Cir. 1974), cert. denied, 420 U.S. 926 , 95 S.Ct. 1123 , 43 L.Ed.2d 397 (1975); Eureka-Carlisle Co. v. Rottman, 398 F.2d 1015, 1019 (10th Cir. 1968); Schenfeld v. Norton Co., 391 F.2d 420, 424 (10th Cir. 1968).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Terrance Bear Ribs, Sr.
See United States v. Nance, 502 F.2d 615, 619-620 (8th Cir. 1974), cert. denied, 420 U.S. 926 , 95 S.Ct. 1123 , 43 L.Ed.2d 396 (1975); Clark v. United States, supra at 60; Campbell v. United States, 85 U.S.App.D.C. 133, 134 , 176 F.2d 45, 46 (1949).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Kenneth O. Brown
As this Court recently recognized in United States v. McNeive, 536 F.2d 1245, at 1247 (8th Cir. 1976): For the Government to establish a violation of § 1341, it must prove “(1) a scheme to defraud, and (2) the mailing of a letter, etc., for the purpose of executing the scheme.” Pereira v. United States, 347 U.S. 1, 8 , 74 S.Ct. 358, 362 , 98 L.Ed. 435 (1954); see United States v. Nance, *374 502 F.2d 615, 618 (8th Cir. 1974), cert. denied, 420 U.S. 926 , 95 S.Ct. 1123 , 43 L.Ed.2d 396 (1975).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. James T. McNeive
Louis and its citizens of their right to the honest, faithful, and lawful decisions and actions in the performance of [McNeive’s] official duties * * *, and of their right to have the City’s business and its affairs conducted honestly * * * and in accordance with the laws of the state and of the City * * For the Government to establish a violation of § 1341, it must prove “(1) a scheme to defraud, and (2) the mailing of a letter, etc., for the purpose of executing the scheme.” Pereira v. United States, 347 U.S. 1, 8 , 74 S.Ct. 358, 362 , 98 L.Ed. 435 (1954); see United States v. Nance…
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Seymour Pollack, United States of America v. Paul M. Sachs, United States of America v. William Cudd
See United States v. Feinberg, 502 F.2d 1180 (7th Cir. 1974), cert. denied 420 U.S. 926 , 95 S.Ct. 1122 , 43 L.Ed.2d 396 (1975); United States v. Kenny, 462 F.2d 1205, 1212 (3d Cir. 1972), cert. denied 409 U.S. 914 , 93 S. Ct. 233 , 34 L.Ed.2d 176 (1973); United States v. Wilkerson, 456 F.2d 57, 61 (6th Cir.), cert. denied 408 U.S. 926 , 92 S.Ct. 2506 , 33 L.Ed.2d 337 (1972).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Connelly
Wright, Federal Practice and Procedure § 344, at 637 (1969); see United States v. McGregor, 503 F.2d 1167, 1169-70 (8th Cir. 1974), cert. denied, 420 U.S. 926 , 95 S.Ct. 1122 , 43 L.Ed.2d 395 (1975); United States v. Polizzi, 500 F.2d 856, 899 (9th Cir. 1974), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 1120 , 95 S.Ct. 802 , 42 L.Ed.2d 820 (1975); United States v. Phillips, 433 F.2d 1364, 1368 (8th Cir. 1970), cert. denied, 401 U.S. 917 , 91 S.Ct. 900 , 27 L.Ed.2d 819 (1971); Jones v. Gasch, 131 U.S.App.D.C. 254 , 404 F.2d 1231, 1242 (1967), cert. denied, 390 U.S. 1029 , 88 S.Ct. 1414 , 20 L.Ed.2d 286 (1968); Uni…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Forriss D. Elliott
See also United States v. Minkin, 504 F.2d 350, 353 (8th Cir. 1974) (affirming mail fraud conviction where fraudulent mailing made only twelve-mile intrastate journey), cert. denied, 420 U.S. 926 (1975); United States v. Mirabile, 503 F.2d 1065, 1067 (8th Cir. 1974) (affirming mail fraud conviction for intrastate mailing), cert. denied, 420 U.S. 973 (1975).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Forriss D. Elliott
See also United States v. Minkin, 504 F.2d 350, 353 (8th Cir.1974) (affirming mail fraud conviction where fraudulent mailing made only twelve-mile intrastate journey), cert. denied, 420 U.S. 926 , 95 S.Ct. 1122 , 43 L.Ed.2d 396 (1975); United States v. Mirabile, 503 F.2d 1065, 1067 (8th Cir.1974) (affirming mail fraud conviction for intrastate mailing), cert. denied, 420 U.S. 973 , 95 S.Ct. 1395 , 43 L.Ed.2d 653 (1975).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Thomas Reda, United States of America v. Michael Edward O'connor, United States of America v. Clarence Dale Cunningham
See also United States v. Nance, 502 F.2d 615, 619 (8th Cir.1974), cert. denied, 420 U.S. 926 , 95 S.Ct. 1123 , 43 L.Ed.2d 396 (1975); United States v. Brake, 596 F.2d 337 (8th Cir.1979).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Washington
Compare United States v. Nance, 502 F.2d 615 (8th Cir. 1974), cert. denied, 420 U.S. 926 , 95 S. Ct. 1123 , 43 L.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Washington
Compare United States v. Nance, 502 F.2d 615 (8th Cir. 1974), cert. denied, 420 U.S. 926 , 95 S. Ct. 1123 , 43 L.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Heiligh v. United States
See also United States v. Feinberg, 502 F.2d 1180 (7th Cir. 1974), cert. denied, 420 U.S. 926 , 95 S.Ct. 1122 , 43 L.Ed.2d 396 (1975); United States v. Kenny, 462 F.2d 1205 (3d Cir.), cert. denied sub nom., Kropke v. United States, 409 U.S. 914 , 93 S.Ct. 233 , 34 L.Ed.2d 176 (1972).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
McGregor
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 74-544.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Feb 18, 1975.
Published
Citer courts: Eighth Circuit (2)
C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.