green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
5.5 score
“the question of the extent of defense discovery, at least that discovery which requires judicial assistance, is a matter within the discretion of the trial court”
Treatment trajectory · 1975 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1975
2000
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 11 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
United States v. Frank S. Cannone, United States of America v. Raymond D. Masciarelli and Lawrence Schultz
the question of the extent of defense discovery, at least that discovery which requires judicial assistance, is a matter within the discretion of the trial court
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. West
See United States v. Lisinski, 728 F.2d 887, 892 (7th Cir.1984) (citing United States v. Braasch, 505 F.2d 139, 151 (7th Cir.1974), cert. denied, 421 U.S. 910 , 95 S.Ct. 1562 , 43 L.Ed.2d 775 (1975)).
discussed
Cited "see"
Charles Sinito Jr. (83-3791), Thomas J. Sinito (84-3018) v. United States
See United States v. Braasch, 505 F.2d 139, 147 (7th Cir.1974), cert. denied, 421 U.S. 910 , 95 S.Ct. 1562 , 43 L.Ed.2d 775 (1975); United States v. Stone, 411 F.2d 597, 598 (5th Cir.1969); see also United States v. Radlick, 581 F.2d 225, 230 (9th Cir.1978); Hvass v. Graven, 257 F.2d 1, 5 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 358 U.S. 835 , 79 S.Ct. 58 , 3 L.Ed.2d 72 (1958); United States v. Baker, 441 F.Supp. 612, 615 (M.D.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. David Hall and W. W. Taylor
See United States v. Braasch, 505 F.2d 139, 150-152 (7th Cir. 1974), cert. denied, 421 U.S. 910 , 95 S.Ct. 1562 , 43 L.Ed.2d 775 (1975), in which policemen were convicted under the Hobbs Act for carrying out the extortion of money from owners of bars and taverns.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Freedman
See, e.g., Hedman, 630 F.2d at 1187-88 (municipal building inspectors); Glynn, 627 F.2d at 40 (municipal electrical inspector); United States v. Staszcuk, 517 F.2d 53 , 55-56 & n. 3 (7th Cir.) (city alderman), ce rt. denied, 423 U.S. 837 , 96 S.Ct. 65 , 46 L.Ed.2d 56 (1975); see also United States v. Braasch, 505 F.2d 139, 141, 144, 151 (7th Cir.1974) (policemen performing illegal acts that could be undertaken only because of their positions), cert. denied, 421 U.S. 910 , 95 S.Ct. 1562 , 43 L.Ed.2d 775 (1975).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Sanchez
Monsivais v. United States, 421 U.S. 976 , 95 S.Ct. 1976 , 44 L.Ed.2d 467 (1975); United States v. Berrigan, 482 F.2d 171, 190 (3d Cir. 1973); see also United States v. Braasch, 505 F.2d 139 (7th Cir. 1974), cert. denied, 421 U.S. 910 , 95 S.Ct. 1562 , 43 L.Ed.2d 775 (1975).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Vincent Moran Doss
(2×)
Compare United States v. Braasch, 505 F.2d 139, 147 (7th Cir. 1974), cert. denied, 421 U.S. 910 , 95 S.Ct. 1562 , 43 L.Ed.2d 775 (1975); Beverly v. United States, 468 F.2d 732, 742-44 (5th Cir. 1972); and In re Pilliteri, 420 F.Supp. 913 (W.D.Pa.1976). 394 Most recently the Supreme Court in United States v. Wong, 431 U.S. 174 n. 8 , 97 S.Ct. 1823, 1826 , 52 L.Ed.2d 231 (1977), stated: 395 There is no constitutional prohibition against summoning potential defendants to testify before a grand jury.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In re J. W. Y.
Monsivais v. United States, 421 U.S. 976 , 95 S.Ct. 1976 , 44 L.Ed.2d 467 (1975); United States v. Berrigan, 482 F.2d 171, 190 (3rd Cir. 1973); see also United States v. Braasch, 505 F.2d 139 (7th Cir. 1974), cert. denied, 421 U.S. 910 , 95 S.Ct. 1562 , 43 L.Ed.2d 775 (1975).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Matter of JWY
Monsivais v. United States, 421 U.S. 976 , 95 S.Ct. 1976 , 44 L.Ed.2d 467 (1975); United States v. Berrigan, 482 F.2d 171, 190 (3rd Cir. 1973); see also United States v. Braasch, 505 F.2d 139 (7th Cir. 1974), cert. denied, 421 U.S. 910 , 95 S.Ct. 1562 , 43 L.Ed.2d 775 (1975).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Thomas E. Keane
See also United States v. Braasch, 505 F.2d 139, 147 (7th Cir. 1974), cert. denied, 421 U.S. 910 , 95 S.Ct. 1562 , 43 L.Ed.2d 775 (1975).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Casimir Staszcuk
Compare Mr. Justice Clark’s reference to “a betrayal of public trust of the most alarming type to a free society” in his opinion in United States v. Braasch, 505 F.2d 139, 141 (7th Cir. 1974), cert. denied, 421 U.S. 910 , 95 S.Ct. 1562 , 43 L.Ed.2d 775 (1975). .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Fink
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 74-820.
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania.
Apr 14, 1975.
Published
Citer courts: Second Circuit (1)
C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.