Fink v. United States, 421 U.S. 911 (1975). · Go Syfert
Fink v. United States, 421 U.S. 911 (1975). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
“the question of the extent of defense discovery, at least that discovery which requires judicial assistance, is a matter within the discretion of the trial court”
41 citation events (1 in the last 25 years) across 16 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: United States v. Frank S. Cannone, United States of America v. Raymond D. Masciarelli and Lawrence Schultz (ca2, 1976-02-17)
Treatment trajectory · 1975 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1975 2000 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 11 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (quoted) United States v. Frank S. Cannone, United States of America v. Raymond D. Masciarelli and Lawrence Schultz
2d Cir. · 1976 · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence low
the question of the extent of defense discovery, at least that discovery which requires judicial assistance, is a matter within the discretion of the trial court
discussed Cited "see" United States v. West
N.D. Ill. · 2010 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Lisinski, 728 F.2d 887, 892 (7th Cir.1984) (citing United States v. Braasch, 505 F.2d 139, 151 (7th Cir.1974), cert. denied, 421 U.S. 910 , 95 S.Ct. 1562 , 43 L.Ed.2d 775 (1975)).
discussed Cited "see" Charles Sinito Jr. (83-3791), Thomas J. Sinito (84-3018) v. United States
6th Cir. · 1984 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Braasch, 505 F.2d 139, 147 (7th Cir.1974), cert. denied, 421 U.S. 910 , 95 S.Ct. 1562 , 43 L.Ed.2d 775 (1975); United States v. Stone, 411 F.2d 597, 598 (5th Cir.1969); see also United States v. Radlick, 581 F.2d 225, 230 (9th Cir.1978); Hvass v. Graven, 257 F.2d 1, 5 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 358 U.S. 835 , 79 S.Ct. 58 , 3 L.Ed.2d 72 (1958); United States v. Baker, 441 F.Supp. 612, 615 (M.D.
discussed Cited "see" United States v. David Hall and W. W. Taylor
10th Cir. · 1976 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Braasch, 505 F.2d 139, 150-152 (7th Cir. 1974), cert. denied, 421 U.S. 910 , 95 S.Ct. 1562 , 43 L.Ed.2d 775 (1975), in which policemen were convicted under the Hobbs Act for carrying out the extortion of money from owners of bars and taverns.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Freedman
N.D. Ill. · 1983 · signal: see also · confidence low
See, e.g., Hedman, 630 F.2d at 1187-88 (municipal building inspectors); Glynn, 627 F.2d at 40 (municipal electrical inspector); United States v. Staszcuk, 517 F.2d 53 , 55-56 & n. 3 (7th Cir.) (city alderman), ce rt. denied, 423 U.S. 837 , 96 S.Ct. 65 , 46 L.Ed.2d 56 (1975); see also United States v. Braasch, 505 F.2d 139, 141, 144, 151 (7th Cir.1974) (policemen performing illegal acts that could be undertaken only because of their positions), cert. denied, 421 U.S. 910 , 95 S.Ct. 1562 , 43 L.Ed.2d 775 (1975).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." State v. Sanchez
N.M. Ct. App. · 1982 · signal: see also · confidence low
Monsivais v. United States, 421 U.S. 976 , 95 S.Ct. 1976 , 44 L.Ed.2d 467 (1975); United States v. Berrigan, 482 F.2d 171, 190 (3d Cir. 1973); see also United States v. Braasch, 505 F.2d 139 (7th Cir. 1974), cert. denied, 421 U.S. 910 , 95 S.Ct. 1562 , 43 L.Ed.2d 775 (1975).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Vincent Moran Doss (2×)
6th Cir. · 1977 · signal: compare · confidence low
Compare United States v. Braasch, 505 F.2d 139, 147 (7th Cir. 1974), cert. denied, 421 U.S. 910 , 95 S.Ct. 1562 , 43 L.Ed.2d 775 (1975); Beverly v. United States, 468 F.2d 732, 742-44 (5th Cir. 1972); and In re Pilliteri, 420 F.Supp. 913 (W.D.Pa.1976). 394 Most recently the Supreme Court in United States v. Wong, 431 U.S. 174 n. 8 , 97 S.Ct. 1823, 1826 , 52 L.Ed.2d 231 (1977), stated: 395 There is no constitutional prohibition against summoning potential defendants to testify before a grand jury.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." In re J. W. Y.
D.C. · 1976 · signal: see also · confidence low
Monsivais v. United States, 421 U.S. 976 , 95 S.Ct. 1976 , 44 L.Ed.2d 467 (1975); United States v. Berrigan, 482 F.2d 171, 190 (3rd Cir. 1973); see also United States v. Braasch, 505 F.2d 139 (7th Cir. 1974), cert. denied, 421 U.S. 910 , 95 S.Ct. 1562 , 43 L.Ed.2d 775 (1975).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Matter of JWY
D.C. · 1976 · signal: see also · confidence low
Monsivais v. United States, 421 U.S. 976 , 95 S.Ct. 1976 , 44 L.Ed.2d 467 (1975); United States v. Berrigan, 482 F.2d 171, 190 (3rd Cir. 1973); see also United States v. Braasch, 505 F.2d 139 (7th Cir. 1974), cert. denied, 421 U.S. 910 , 95 S.Ct. 1562 , 43 L.Ed.2d 775 (1975).
cited Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Thomas E. Keane
7th Cir. · 1975 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also United States v. Braasch, 505 F.2d 139, 147 (7th Cir. 1974), cert. denied, 421 U.S. 910 , 95 S.Ct. 1562 , 43 L.Ed.2d 775 (1975).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Casimir Staszcuk
7th Cir. · 1975 · signal: compare · confidence low
Compare Mr. Justice Clark’s reference to “a betrayal of public trust of the most alarming type to a free society” in his opinion in United States v. Braasch, 505 F.2d 139, 141 (7th Cir. 1974), cert. denied, 421 U.S. 910 , 95 S.Ct. 1562 , 43 L.Ed.2d 775 (1975). .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Fink
v.
United States
No. 74-820.
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania.
Apr 14, 1975.
421 U.S. 911

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.