green
Positive treatment
3.2 score
Treatment trajectory · 1976 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1976
2001
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 8 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
McConnaughey v. United States
See Quarles v. United States, 349 A.2d 690, 692 (D.C.1975), cert. denied, 425 U.S. 972 , 96 S.Ct. 2169 , 48 L.Ed.2d 795 (1976). 8 .The government contends that appellant waived his right to a public trial by failing to object when the children were excluded.
discussed
Cited "see"
Hazel v. United States
See Quarles v. United States, 349 A.2d 690, 692 (D.C.1975) (rejection of right to presence at submission of trial exhibits to jury after jury request because of the “ministerial nature of the activity and the lack of unusual circumstances”), cer t. denied, 425 U.S. 972 , 96 S.Ct. 2169 , 48 L.Ed.2d 795 (1976) (cited in Harris, supra, 489 A.2d at 468 ).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Robert Andreen
See United States v. Santiago, 528 F.2d 1130, 1133 (2nd Cir.), cert. denied, 425 U.S. 972 , 96 S.Ct. 2169 , 48 L.Ed.2d 795 , (1976).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Wallace W. Watkins
See United States v. McNulty, 528 F.2d 1223 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 425 U.S. 972 , 96 S.Ct. 2170 , 48 L.Ed.2d 796 (1976).
discussed
Cited "see"
Vaughn v. United States
See Quarles v. United States, D.C.App., 349 A.2d 690, 692 (1975), cert, denied, 425 U.S. 972 , 96 S.Ct. 2169 , 48 L.Ed.2d 795 (1976), where this court held that transmittal of evidence to the jury room was a ministerial act of the court and thus a defendant had no *1295 Fifth Amendment right to be present at that time.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Silva
In cases involving authorized use, however, the government must also prove that the defendant “lacked a good faith belief that the expenditure was for the legitimate benefit of the union.” U. S. v. Bane, 583 F.2d 832, 835-36 (6th Cir. 1978), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 1127 , 99 S.Ct. 1044 , 59 L.Ed.2d 88 (1979); see also U. S. v. Santiago, 528 F.2d 1130, 1133-34 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 425 U.S. 972 , 96 S.Ct. 2169 , 48 L.Ed.2d 795 (1976).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Thordarson
See also United States v. Santiago, 528 F.2d 1130 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 425 U.S. 972 , 96 S.Ct. 2169 , 48 L.Ed.2d 795 (1976); where the same standard was used. 12 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. George W. Dixon, A/k/a, G. W. Dixon
In cases involving authorized use, however, the government must also prove that the defendant “lacked a good faith belief that the expenditure was for the legitimate benefit of the union.” U. S. v. Bane, 583 F.2d 832, 835-36 (6th Cir. 1978), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 1127 , 99 S.Ct. 1044 , 59 L.Ed.2d 88 (1979); see also U. S. v. Santiago, 528 F.2d 1130, 1133-34 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 425 U.S. 972 , 96 S.Ct. 2169 , 48 L.Ed.2d 795 (1976).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Paquin et ux.
v.
Cronk
v.
Cronk
No. 75-1135.
Supreme Court of the United States.
May 19, 1976.
Published
C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.