green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
5.5 score
“there is no general requirement that the government disclose in a bill of particulars all the overt acts it will prove in establishing a conspiracy charge”
Treatment trajectory · 1977 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1977
2001
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 11 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
United States v. Kahale
there is no general requirement that the government disclose in a bill of particulars all the overt acts it will prove in establishing a conspiracy charge
discussed
Cited "see"
United States of America, Appellee/cross-Appellant v. Elijah Hayes, Appellant/cross-Appellee
See United States v. Thirion, 813 F.2d 146, 152 (8th Cir.1987) (citing United States v. Carroll, 510 F.2d 507, 509 (2d Cir.1975), cert. denied, 426 U.S. 923 , 96 S.Ct. 2633 , 49 L.Ed.2d 378 (1976)); United States v. Sanchez, 917 F.2d 607, 612 (1st Cir.1990), cert. denied, 499 U.S. 977 , 111 S.Ct. 1625 , 113 L.Ed.2d 722 (1991).
cited
Cited "see"
Bell v. State
See United States v. Carroll, 510 F.2d 507, 511-12 (2d Cir.1975), cert. denied, 426 U.S. 923 , 96 S.Ct. 2633 , 49 L.Ed.2d 378 (1976).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Norman Bernard Thirion A/K/A Norman Tyrone A/K/A Dr. Thirion, United States of America v. Ronald A. Sablosky, United States of America v. Jack Casperson
See United States v. Carroll, 510 F.2d 507, 509 (2d Cir.1975), cert. denied, 426 U.S. 923 , 96 S.Ct. 2633 , 49 L.Ed.2d 378 (1976). 6 Having concluded that the indictment is sufficient, we now turn to the question whether Thirion's conviction on the substantive offenses as a Pinkerton coconspirator violates the doctrine of speciality. 20 Our determination of whether Thirion's coconspirator convictions offend the doctrine of speciality requires further inquiry into the nature of coconspirator liability.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Thirion
See United States v. Carroll, 510 F.2d 507, 509 (2d Cir.1975), cert. denied, 426 U.S. 923 , 96 S.Ct. 2633 , 49 L.Ed.2d 378 (1976). 6 Having concluded that the indictment is sufficient, we now turn to the question whether Thirion’s conviction on the substantive offenses as a Pinkerton coconspirator violates the doctrine of speciality.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Feola
See United States v. Carroll, 510 F.2d 507, 509 (2d Cir.1975), cert. denied, 426 U.S. 923 , 96 S.Ct. 2633 , 49 L.Ed.2d 378 (1976) (no general requirement that government disclose in a bill of particulars all the overt acts it will prove in establishing a conspiracy charge); United States v. Persico, 621 F.Supp. at 868 ; United States v. Politi, 334 F.Supp. 1318, 1321 (S.D.N.Y.1971), aff'd without op. 516 F.2d 897 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 801 , 96 S.Ct. 8 , 46 L.Ed.2d 244 (1975).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Olive Bell
See United States v. Miller, 529 F.2d 1125, 1128 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 426 U.S. 924 , 96 S.Ct. 2634 , 49 L.Ed.2d 379 (1976).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Smith
See United States v. Miller, 529 F.2d 1125, 1128-29 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 426 U.S. 924 , 96 S.Ct. 2634 , 49 L.Ed.2d 379 (1976).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Arden Lee Smith AKA Alfredo Lama, United States of America v. Leroy Jones, United States of America v. John Doe Curley, AKA Ernest Crayton
See United States v. Miller, 529 F.2d 1125, 1128-29 (9th Cir.), Cert. denied, 426 U.S. 924 , 96 S.Ct. 2634 , 49 L.Ed.2d 379 (1976). 42 The judgments are AFFIRMED.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Chovanec
See United States v. Carroll, 510 F.2d 507, 509 (2d Cir. 1975), cert. denied, 426 U.S. 923 , 96 S.Ct. 2633 , 49 L.Ed.2d 378 (1976).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Peter Angelilli, William Butler, Donald Irish, and Donald Ribotsky
(2×)
See, e. g., United States v. Carroii, 510 F.2d 507, 509 (2d Cir. 1975), cert. denied, 426 U.S. 923 , 96 S.Ct. 2633 , 49 L.Ed.2d 378 (1976); 22 C.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Milroy
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 75-6479.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 7, 1976.
Published
Citer courts: E.D. New York (1)
C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.