green
Positive treatment
6.8 score
Treatment trajectory · 1976 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1976
2001
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 13 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Gilliland
Riley, 287 Wis. 2d at 251 ; see generally State v. Farha, 218 Kan. 394, 398 , 544 P.2d 341 (1975), cert. denied 426 U.S. 949 (1976).
discussed
Cited "see"
Nesbitt v. USA; Graffam
See United States v. Pena, 527 F.2d 1356, 1361 (5th Cir.1976) (declining to decide whether informant was an agent, because statements were made after informant's relationship with government ended), cert, denied, 426 U.S. 949 (1976); see generally Woodman v. Haemonetics Corp., 51 F.3d 1087 , 1094 n.4 (1st Cir. 1995); Union Mut.
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Bolds
See United States v. Pena, 527 F.2d 1356 (5th Cir.1976), cert. denied 426 U.S. 949 , 96 S.Ct. 3168 , 49 L.Ed.2d 1185 (1976).
examined
Cited "see"
Richard M. Lippay v. Dean C. Christos Commonwealth of Pa. Dean C. Christos
(4×)
also: Cited "see, e.g."
See United States v. Pena, 527 F.2d 1356, 1361 (5th Cir.1976) (holding that prior statement of informant who did not falsify testimony did not fall within the rule where he stated that he wanted to "set up” defendant to get even with him), cert. denied, 426 U.S. 949 , 96 S.Ct. 3168 , 49 L.Ed.2d 1185 (1976).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Jerry Wayne Woolbright
See United States v. Pena, 527 F.2d 1356, 1362 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 426 U.S. 949 , 96 S.Ct. 3168 , 49 L.Ed.2d 1185 (1976); Pink Supply Corp. v. Hiebert, Inc., 612 F.Supp. 1334, 1345 (D.Minn.1985), aff'd 788 F.2d 1313 (8th Cir.1986); 4 J.
cited
Cited "see"
Commonwealth v. Drew
See United States v. Pena, 527 F.2d 1356, 1361 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 426 U.S. 949 (1976).
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Daniels
See State v. Farha, 218 Kan. 394 , 544 P.2d 341 (1975) cert. denied, 426 U.S. 949 , 96 S.Ct. 3170 , 49 L.Ed.2d 1186 (1976).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Earl J. Gorel
See United States v. Pena, 527 F.2d 1356, 1365 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 426 U.S. 949 , 96 S.Ct. 3168 , 49 L.Ed.2d 1185 (1976). 13 Contrary to defendant's assertions, an indictment charging in separate counts conspiracy to kidnap and conspiracy to use the United States mail to send a ransom note is not duplicitous.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Gorel
See United States v. Pena, 527 F.2d 1356, 1365 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 426 U.S. 949 , 96 S.Ct. 3168 , 49 L.Ed.2d 1185 (1976).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Roel Angel Trevino
See United States v. Pena, 527 F.2d 1356 (5 Cir. 1975), cert. denied, 426 U.S. 949 , 96 S.Ct. 3168 , 49 L.Ed.2d 1185 (1976); United States v. Velasquez, 496 F.2d 1009 (5 Cir. 1974).
discussed
Cited "see"
Wste-Tv, Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission, Puerto Rico Broadcasting, Inc., Invervenor
Valley Telecasting Co. v. FCC, 118 U.S.App.D.C. 410, 413 , 336 F.2d 914, 917 (1964); accord, Civic Telecasting Corp. v. FCC, 173 U.S.App.D.C. 236, 239 , 523 F.2d 1185 , 1188 n. 8 (1975), cert. denied, 426 U.S. 949 , 96 S.Ct. 3169 , 49 L.Ed.2d 1186 (1976).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Glen Vaglica and Ronald Parker
See also United States v. Pena, 527 F.2d 1356, 1365 (5th Cir.) cert. denied, 426 U.S. 949 , 96 S.Ct. 3168 , 49 L.Ed.2d 1185 (1976) (“equally supported theories” charge not plain error); Accord, United States v. Sukumolachan, 610 F.2d 685, 688 (9th Cir.1980) (“equally supported theories” charge often favors defendant).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Shafter W. Summers
See also United States v. Pena, 527 F.2d 1356, 1360-61 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 426 U.S. 949 , 96 S.Ct. 3168 , 49 L.Ed.2d 1185 (1976) (informant’s statements not admission by government because made after his relationship with government had ceased).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Pena
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 75-1400.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 21, 1976.
Cited by 1 opinion | Published
C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.