green
Positive treatment
2.1 score
Treatment trajectory · 1978 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1978
2002
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Florida Power & Light Company v. Westinghouse Electric Corporation
See Natural Resources Defense Council v. U.S. Nuclear Reg. Comm’n, 539 F.2d 824 (2d Cir.1976), ce rt. granted, 430 U.S. 944 , 97 S.Ct. 1578 , 51 L.Ed.2d 791 (1977), judgment vacated and case remanded for consideration of mootness, 434 U.S. 1030 , 98 S.Ct. 759 , 54 L.Ed.2d 777 (1978). 11 . 1982 U.S.Code Cong. & Admin.News, 3794. 12 .
discussed
Cited "see"
State by Spannaus v. Century Camera, Inc.
See C.M.C. v. A.P.F., 257 N.W.2d 282 (Minn.1977), appeal dismissed, 434 U.S. 1029 , 98 S.Ct. 759 , 54 L.Ed.2d 777 (1978); State v. Goblirsch, 309 Minn. 401, 407 , 246 N.W.2d 12, 15 (1976). 13 We note that the State of Minnesota is not alone in prohibiting employers from compelling employees to take polygraph or similar tests. 14 *744 Next we focus on the relationship between the state’s interest and the regulation of commercial speech imposed by sections 181.75 and 181.76.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Seafarers International Union Of North America v. United States Coast Guard
Resolution of this latter question requires consideration of a variety of pragmatic factors: whether the agency's actions or inactions challenged in the law suit are "final," id. at 149-51 , 87 S.Ct. at 1515-16 , whether the issues presented for review are primarily legal as opposed to factual in nature, id. at 149 , 87 S.Ct. at 1515 , and whether administrative remedies have been exhausted at least to the extent that an adequate factual record has been established. 11 See generally Aquavella, 437 F.2d at 403-05 ; see also Rescue Army v. Municipal Court of Los Angeles, 331 U.S. 549 , 67 S.Ct. …
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
A. P. F.
v.
C. M. C., a Minor, by Conway
v.
C. M. C., a Minor, by Conway
No. 77-749.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 16, 1978.
Published
Appeal from Sup. Ct. Minn, dismissed for want of substantial federal question.