green
Positive treatment
3.7 score
Treatment trajectory · 1978 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1978
2002
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 12 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "see"
Studiengesellschaft Kohle M.B.H. v. Dart Industries, Inc.
See Pitcairn v. United States, 212 Ct.Cl. 168 , 547 F.2d 1106 (1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1051 , 98 S.Ct. 903 , 54 L.Ed.2d 804 (1978).
cited
Cited "see"
Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority v. One Parcel Of Land In Montgomery County, Maryland
See Pitcairn v. United States, 547 F.2d 1106 (Ct.Cl.1976), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1051 , 98 S.Ct. 903 , 54 L.Ed.2d 804 (1978).
cited
Cited "see"
Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority v. One Parcel of Land
See Pitcairn v. United States, 547 F.2d 1106 (Ct.Cl. 1976), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1051 , 98 S.Ct. 903 , 54 L.Ed.2d 804 (1978).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. 50 Acres of Land, More or Less, Situated in Dallas County
See Pitcairn v. United States, 547 F.2d 1106, 1130 (Ct.Cl. 1977) cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1051 , 98 S.Ct. 903 , 54 L.Ed.2d 804 (1978) (Judge Skelton, concurring in part and dissenting in part).
discussed
Cited "see"
Leonard N. Bebchick v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Commission, D.C. Transit System, Inc., Intervenor. D.C. Transit System, Inc. v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Commission, Leonard N. Bebchick, Intervenors
See Pitcairn v. United States, 212 Ct.Cl. 168, 189-97 , 547 F.2d 1106, 1120-24 (1976), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1051 , 98 S.Ct. 903 , 54 L.Ed.2d 804 (1978); Tektronix, Inc. v. United States, 213 Ct.Cl. 257, 273-75 , 552 F.2d 343, 352-53 (1977), appealed after remand, 575 F.2d 832 , cert. denied, 439 U.S. 1048 , 99 S.Ct. 724 , 58 L.Ed.2d 707 (1978); Miller v. United States, 223 Ct.Cl. ---, ---, 620 F.2d 812, 837-40 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see"
Bebchick v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Commission
See Pitcairn v. United States, 212 Ct.Cl. 168, 189-97 , 647 F.2d 1106 , 1120-24 (1976), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1051 , 98 S.Ct. 903 , 54 L.Ed.2d 804 (1978); Tektronix, Inc. v. United States, 213 Ct.Cl. 257, 273-75 , 552 F.2d 343, 352-53 (1977), appealed after remand, 575 F.2d 832 , cert. denied, 439 U.S. 1048 , 99 S.Ct. 724 , 58 L.Ed.2d 707 (1978); Miller v. United States, 223 Ct.Cl.-,-, 620 F.2d 812, 837-40 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Dow Chemical Co. v. United States
See, e.g., Pitcairn v. United States, 547 F.2d 1106, 1120 (Ct.Cl. 1976), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 1051 , 98 S.Ct. 903 , 54 L.Ed.2d 804 (1978); Tektronix, Inc. v. United States, 552 F.2d 343 (Ct.C1.1977), modified on denial of reh’g, 213 Ct.Cl. 307 , 557 F.2d 265 , remanded to 196 U.S.P.Q. 204 , 1977 WL 22761 aff'd in part, modified in part, 216 Ct.Cl. 144 , 575 F.2d 832 (1977), cert. denied, Hickok Elec.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Ares-Serono, Inc. v. Organon International B.V.
If "experiments are conducted with a view to the adaption of the invention to the experimenter's business, the acts of making or of use are violations of the rights of the inventor and infringements of his patent.” Id. at 620 (quoting Pfizer, Inc. v. International Rectifier Corporation, 1982 WL 51039 (C.D.Cal.1982), emphasis omitted); see Radio Corporation of America v. Andrea, 90 F.2d 612, 614 (2d Cir.1937) (tests to determine marketability were commercial in nature and did not constitute experimental use); see also Pitcairn v. United States, 547 F.2d 1106, 1125-1126 (Ct.Cl.1976), cert. den…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Penda Corp. v. United States
Calhoun, 453 F.2d at 1385 ; see also Pitcairn v. United States, 547 F.2d 1106, 1114-15 (Ct.Cl.1976) (finding an established royalty based on one license and a generally extended offer), cert, denied, 434 U.S. 1051 , 98 S.Ct. 903 , 54 L.Ed.2d 804 (1978).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Bernstein v. Consolidated Foods Corp.
See also Cox v. Allied Chemical Corp., 538 F.2d 1094 , 1087 (5th Cir.1976), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1051 , 98 S.Ct. 903 , 54 L.Ed.2d 804 (1978); Odomes v. Nucare, Inc., 653 F.2d 246, 253 (6th Cir.1981).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Roche Products, Inc. v. Bolar Pharmaceutical Co., Inc.
See, e.g., Pitcairn v. United States, 547 F.2d 1106 , 212 Ct.Cl. 168 , 192 USPQ 612 (1976), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1051 , 98 S.Ct. 903 , 54 L.Ed.2d 804 (1978) (experimental use may be a defense to infringement); United States v. Univis Lens Co., 316 U.S. 241 , 62 S.Ct. 1088 , 86 L.Ed. 1408 (1942) (“An incident to the purchase of any article, whether patented or unpatented, is the right to use and sell it, * * *.” Id. at 249 , 62 S.Ct. at 1093 ); General Electric Co. v. United States, 572 F.2d 745 , 215 Ct.Cl. 636 , 198 USPQ 65 (1978) (“[I]t can be properly assumed that as part of the bar…
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Willis Anderson LYGHT, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. FORD MOTOR COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee
See also Cox v. Allied Chemical Corp., 538 F.2d 1094, 1098 (5th Cir. 1976), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1051 , 98 S.Ct. 903 , 54 L.Ed.2d 804 (1978).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Weyerhaeuser Co.
v.
Shepler
v.
Shepler
No. 77-823.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 23, 1978.
Certiorari.
Published
Sup. Ct. Ore. Certiorari denied.
Mr. Justice White would grant certiorari.