green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
7.5 score
“testimony concerning extra-judicial identifications is admissible regardless of whether there has been an accurate in-court identification”
Treatment trajectory · 1978 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1978
2002
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 16 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
State v. Delgado
testimony concerning extra-judicial identifications is admissible regardless of whether there has been an accurate in-court identification
cited
Cited "see"
Commonwealth v. Cong Duc Le
See United States v. Lewis, 565 F.2d 1248, 1252 (2d Cir. 1977), cert. denied, 435 U.S. 973 (1978); 4 J.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Anthony J. Brown
See United States v. Carter, 569 F.2d 801, 803 (4th Cir.1977), cert. denied, 435 U.S. 973 (1978).
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Collins
Accord United States v. Carter, 569 F.2d 801, 804 (4th Cir. 1977), cert. denied, 435 U.S. 973 (1978).
discussed
Cited "see"
Commonwealth v. Doa
(2×)
See United States v. Lewis, 565 F.2d 1248 (2d Cir.1977), cert. den. 435 U.S. 973 , 98 S.Ct. 1618 , 56 L.Ed.2d 66 ; State v. Kevil, 111 Ariz. 240 , 527 P.2d 285 (1974); People v. Gould, 54 Cal.2d 621 , 7 Cal.Rptr. 273 , 354 P.2d 865 (1960); People v. Trujillo, 189 Colo. 206 , 539 P.2d 1234 (1975); State v. Whelan, 200 Conn. 743 , 513 A.2d 86 (1986); State v. Freber, 366 So.2d 426 (Fla.1978); Barriner v. State, 161 Ga.App. 59 , 289 S.E.2d 289 (1982); State v. Naeole, 62 Haw. 563 , 617 P.2d 820 (1980); People v. Miller, 27 Ill.App.3d 667 , 327 N.E.2d 8 (1975); Johnson v. State, 237 Md. 283 , 206 …
cited
Cited "see"
State v. McClendon
Evid., rule 801 (d) (1) (C); see United States v. Lewis, 565 F.2d 1248,1250-52 (2d Cir. 1977), cert. denied, 435 U.S. 973 , 98 S. Ct. 1618 , 56 L.
cited
Cited "see"
Ingram v. State
Accord United States v. Carter, 569 F.2d 801 (4th Cir.1977), cert. denied, 435 U.S. 973 , 98 S.Ct. 1618 , 56 L.Ed.2d 66 (1978).
discussed
Cited "see"
Commonwealth v. Daye
(2×)
See United States v. Lewis, 565 F.2d 1248,1252 (2d Cir. 1977), cert. denied, 435 U.S. 973 (1978); 4 J.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Paul Ajlouny
Stone v. Powell, supra, 428 U.S. at 485 n. 23, 96 S.Ct. at 3048; United States v. Peltier, supra, 422 *841 U.S. at 537-38, 95 S.Ct. at 2317-18 ; see United States v. Reda, 563 F.2d 510, 511-12 (2d Cir. 1977) (per curiam), cert. denied, 435 U.S. 973 , 98 S.Ct. 1617 , 56 L.Ed.2d 65 (1978).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. German Fidel Cueto
See United States v. Lewis, 565 F.2d 1248, 1250-52 (2d Cir. 1977), cert. denied, 435 U.S. 973 , 98 S.Ct. 1618 , 56 L.Ed.2d 66 (1978).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Jeffrey Brian Ziegler
The Court continued: “It is, of course, irrelevant that the Union or some of its officials might validly have consented to a search of the area where the records were kept, regardless of De-Forte’s wishes, for it is not claimed that any such consent was given, either expressly or by implication.” Id. at 369-70 , 88 S.Ct. 2120 ; see also United States v. Carter, 569 F.2d 801, 804 (4th Cir.1977), cert. denied 435 U.S. 973 , 98 S.Ct. 1618 , 56 L.Ed.2d 66 (1978).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Ziegler
The Court continued: “It is, of course, irrelevant that the Union or some of its officials might validly have consented to a search of the area where the records were kept, regardless of DeForte’s wishes, for it is not claimed that any such consent was given, either expressly or by implication.” Id. at 369-70 ; see also United States v. Carter, 569 F.2d 801, 804 (4th Cir. 1978), cert. denied 435 U.S. 973 (1978).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Honaker
See also United States v. Carter, 569 F.2d 801 (4th Cir.1977), cert. denied, 435 U.S. 973 , 98 S.Ct. 1618 , 56 L.Ed.2d 66 (1978); United *57 States v. Lewis, 528 F.2d 312 (4th Cir.1975).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
People v. Malone
(2×)
See also United States v Lewis, 565 F2d 1248, 1251-1252 (CA 2, 1977), cert den 435 US 973 (1978).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Owens v. State
(2×)
See also United States v. Carter, 569 F.2d 801, 805 (4th Cir.1977), ce rt. denied, 435 U.S. 973 , 98 S.Ct. 1618 , 56 L.Ed.2d 66 (1978) (defendant’s employer and owner of truck validly consented to search where police found gun wrapped in a coat liner behind seat; “it was reasonable to recognize that [the owner] had the right to permit inspection and that Carter had assumed the risk that [he] might so do”).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Commonwealth v. Furtick
See also United States v. Lewis, 565 F.2d 1248,1252 (2d Cir. 1977), cert. denied, 435 U.S. 973 (1978); 4 J.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Brown
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 77-6111.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Apr 17, 1978.
Published
Citer courts: Supreme Court of New Hampshire (1)
C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.