cited Cited "see" State v. Stanley Baker See Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U.S. 307 , 99 S.Ct. 195 (1979).

cited Cited "see" State v. Fuller Id.; see Rhodes v. Schoen, 574 F.2d 968, 969 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 868 , 99 S.Ct. 195 , 58 L.Ed.2d 178 (1978).

discussed Cited "see" United States v. Jerome Susskind (91-1003) James Rumler (91-1004) and Scott Nickerson (91-1005) (2×) See United States v. Pope, 574 F.2d 320, 326-27 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 436 U.S. 929 , 98 S.Ct. 2828 , 56 L.Ed.2d 774 , 436 U.S. 949 , 98 S.Ct. 2856 , 56 L.Ed.2d 792 , 439 U.S. 868 , 99 S.Ct. 195 , 58 L.Ed.2d 179 (1978) (holding an unintentional Jeneks error harmless when the trial court had provided the statements to the defendant and recalled the witnesses to cure the error); United States v. Lane, 479 F.2d 1134, 1136 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 861 , 94 S.Ct. 78 , 38 L.Ed.2d 112 (1973) (holding there was no Jeneks error due to the government’s failure to turn over rough notes use…

discussed Cited "see" State v. Lewis The purpose of the agreement, set put in Article I, is to provide cooperative procedures between party jurisdictions to protect a prisoner’s right to a speedy trial and to remove “uncertainties which obstruct programs of prisoner treatment and rehabilitation.” Id.; See Rhodes v. Schoen, 574 F.2d 968, 969 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 868 , 99 S.Ct. 195 , 58 L.Ed. 2d 178 (1978).