green
Positive treatment
4.5 score
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. O'Neil
See generally United States v. Pimienta-Redondo, 874 ___ _________ _____________ ________________ 26 F.2d 9, 14 (1st Cir.) (en banc) (discussing resentencing in multiple-count case after determination that the Double Jeopardy Clause barred imposition of separate sentence on one of two counts of conviction), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 890 (1989). _____ ______ VI CONCLUSION VI CONCLUSION We need go no further.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. O'Neil
See generally United States v. Pimienta-Redondo, 874 26 F.2d 9, 14 (1st Cir.) (en banc) (discussing resentencing in multiple-count case after determination that the Double Jeopardy Clause barred imposition of separate sentence on one of two counts of conviction), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 890 (1989).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen & Helpers of America
v.
Daniel and Local 705, International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen & Helpers of America v. Daniel
v.
Daniel and Local 705, International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen & Helpers of America v. Daniel
No. 77-753; No. 77-754.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 10, 1978.
Published
C. A. 7th Cir. [Certiorari granted, 434 U. S. 1061.] Motion of Securities and Exchange Commission for leave to participate in oral argument as amicus curiae granted, and 15 additional minutes allotted for that purpose. Petitioners also allotted 15 additional minutes for oral argument. Motion of the Solicitor General for leave to participate in oral argument as amicus curiae denied.