discussed Cited as authority (rule) Alfredo Suarez, Jr. v. State (2×) The Court 2 [***LEdHR4A] Under Virginia law, vol- of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit reversed the judgment. untary intoxication -- although not an affirmative 6 The court noted that a dissent from the denial of certio- defense to second-degree murder -- is material to rari in a case in this Court had exposed the question the element of premeditation and may be found to whether the constitutional rule of In re Winship, 397 U.S. have negated it.

discussed Cited "see" State v. Williams See Jackson v. Virginia, 439 U.S. 1064 , 99 S.Ct. 828 , 59 L.Ed.2d 29 (1979). [1] In his sentence report, the trial judge noted that at the time of the defendant's indictment, he outwardly exhibited possible mental problems.