green
Positive treatment
4.7 score
Treatment trajectory · 1979 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1979
2002
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 8 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "see"
Cable Television Ass'n of New York v. Finneran
See Brookhaven Cable TV, Inc. v. Kelly, 573 F.2d 765, 767 (2d Cir.1978), cert. denied, 441 U.S. 904 , 99 S.Ct. 1991 , 60 L.Ed.2d 372 (1979).
discussed
Cited "see"
Cable Television Association of New York, Inc. v. Finneran
See Brookhaven Cable TV, Inc. v. Kelly, 573 F.2d 765, 767 (2d Cir.1978), cert. denied, 441 U.S. 904 , 99 S.Ct. 1991 , 60 L.Ed.2d 372 (1979). 21 Responding to the absence of federal rate regulation in the 1960's and early 1970's, municipalities extracted agreements from the cable companies to submit to local rate regulation in return for an exclusive franchise with permission to use the city's rights of way to wire customers.
discussed
Cited "see"
Town of Norwood v. Adams-Russell Co.
See Brookhaven Cable TV, Inc. v. Kelly, 573 F.2d 765 (2d Cir. 1978), cert, denied, 441 U.S. 904 (1979). 5 The final license in this case was issued on July 27, 1982. 6 A “service tier” is defined in 47 U.S.C. § 522 (14) as “a category of cable service or other services provided by a cable operator and for which a separate rate is charged by the cable operator.” The Supercable tier service fits the definition of a service tier.
cited
Cited "see"
Computer & Communications Industry Ass'n v. Federal Communications Commission
Accord Brookhaven Cable TV, Inc. v. Kelly, 573 F.2d 765 (2d Cir.1978), cert. denied, 441 U.S. 904 , 99 S.Ct. 1991 , 60 L.Ed.2d 372 (1979). .
discussed
Cited "see"
Midland Telecasting Company v. Midessa Television Company, Inc.
See Brookhaven Cable TV, Inc. v. Kelly, 573 F.2d 765, 767 (2d Cir. 1978) (FCC may regulate cable systems if it furthers a “goal which [the FCC] is entitled to pursue in the broadcast area”), cert. denied, 441 U.S. 904 , 99 S.Ct. 1991 , 60 L.Ed.2d 372 (1979).
discussed
Cited "see"
O'Bannon v. Town Court Nursing Center
(2×)
See n. 4, supra. Although the plaintiffs filed their action on behalf of a class of all Medicaid recipients in the home, the District Court never certified the class.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State Corp. Commission v. Federal Communications Commission
See, e.g., New York State Commission on Cable Television v. FCC, 669 F.2d 58 , 62 n. 9 (2d Cir.1982); NCUC I, 537 F.2d at 790-91 & n. 2; see also Brookhaven Cable Television, Inc. v. Kelly, 573 F.2d 765 , 768 (2d Cir.1978), cert. denied, 441 U.S. 904 , 99 S.Ct. 1991 , 60 L.Ed.2d 372 (1979).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State Corporation Commission Of The State Of Kansas v. Federal Communications Commission
See, e.g., New York State Commission on Cable Television v. FCC, 669 F.2d 58 , 62 n. 9 (2d Cir.1982); NCUC I, 537 F.2d at 790-91 & n. 2; see also Brookhaven Cable Television, Inc. v. Kelly, 573 F.2d 765 , 768 (2d Cir.1978), cert. denied, 441 U.S. 904 , 99 S.Ct. 1991 , 60 L.Ed.2d 372 (1979). 25 The decision to proceed via declaratory adjudication was not an abuse of discretion under the circumstances of this case.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Norfolk & Western Railway Co.
v.
Liepelt, Administratrix
v.
Liepelt, Administratrix
No. 78-1323.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Apr 16, 1979.
Published
App. Ct. Ill., 1st Dist. Certiorari granted.