Hood v. United States, 444 U.S. 854 (1979). · Go Syfert
Search
Hood v. United States, 444 U.S. 854 (1979). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
11 citation events across 4 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: State v. Sapiel (me, 1981-07-30)
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" State v. Sapiel
Me. · 1981 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Rich, Me., 395 A.2d 1123, 1130 (1978), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 854 , 100 S.Ct. 110 , 62 L.Ed. 71 (1979) (applying abuse of discretion standard where an unlisted witness is allowed to testify).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." State v. Lax
Me. · 1984 · signal: see also · confidence low
Notwithstanding a defendant’s limited right to appeal an alleged illegal sentence to the Law Court, ultimate cognizance will be given to an illegal sentence when the alleged sentencing violation appears so clearly on the record’s face that there “can be no rational disagreement as to its existence.” See State v. Blanchard, 409 A.2d 229, 233 (Me.1979); see also State v. Rich, 395 A.2d 1123, 1133 (Me.1978), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 854 , 100 S.Ct. 110 , 62 L.Ed.2d 71 (1979).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Hood
v.
United States and Thurmond v. United States
No. 78-6754; No. 78-6774.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 1, 1979.
444 U.S. 854
Published

C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 599 F. 2d 1056.