green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
8.5 score
G Cite
cited 3× by 1 distinct case ·
“Mashpee I”
Treatment trajectory · 1980 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1980
2003
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 36 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Nicholas Allocco, Ronald Rubinstein, Esq.
See In re Irving, 600 F.2d 1027, 1031-32 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 866 , 100 S.Ct. 137 , 62 L.Ed.2d 89 (1979).
discussed
Cited "see"
Guy O. Dove, Iii, Spargos Mining Nl v. Atlantic Capital Corporation
See In re Irving, 600 F.2d 1027 , 1031 n. 1 (2d Cir.) (“[I]t is true that a contempt order is not final until sanctions have been imposed.”), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 866 , 100 S.Ct. 137 , 62 L.Ed.2d 89 (1979); Comptone Co. v. Rayex Corp., 251 F.2d 487, 488 (2d Cir.1958) (per curiam) (“[N]o penalty has been imposed, and the contempt order remains merely a finding, without judgment thereon, subject to modification, prior to judgment.
discussed
Cited "see"
Harrison v. State
See Mashpee Tribe v. New Seabury Corp., 592 F.2d 575 , 586-87 n. 6, 589 (1st Cir.1979), ce rt. denied, 444 U.S. 866 , 100 S.Ct. 138 , 62 L.Ed.2d 90 (1979), quoted in Board of Equalization, 666 P.2d at 1023 .
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Cooperative Theatres of Ohio, Inc. And David Beaupain
See United States v. Gillen, 599 F.2d 541 (3rd Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 866 , 100 S.Ct. 137 , 62 L.Ed.2d 89 (1979).
cited
Cited "see"
Mashpee Tribe v. Secretary of the Interior
See Mashpee Tribe v. New Seabury Corp., 447 F.Supp. 940 (D.Mass.1978) (Mashpee I ), aff'd, 592 F.2d 575 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 866 , 100 S.Ct. 138 , 62 L.Ed.2d 90 (1979).
cited
Cited "see"
Mashpee Tribe v. Secretary of the Interior
See Mashpee Tribe v. New Seabury Corp., 447 F.Supp. 940 (D.Mass.1978) (Ma shpee I), aff'd, 592 F.2d 575 (1st Cir.), cert, denied, 444 U.S. 866 , 100 S.Ct. 138 , 62 L.Ed.2d 90 (1979).
discussed
Cited "see"
Parkway Gallery Furniture, Inc. v. Kittinger/Pennsylvania House Group, Inc.
In re Chicken Antitrust Litigation, 560 F.Supp. 1006, 1008 (N.D.Ga.1982); see Mashpee Tribe v. New Seabury Corp., 592 F.2d 575, 589 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 866 , 100 S.Ct. 138 , 62 L.Ed.2d 90 (1979).
discussed
Cited "see"
Randy Duane Rost, Joe Vester Rost, and Ruby Rost v. United States
(2×)
See Gard v. United States, 594 F.2d 1230 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 866 , 100 S.Ct. 138 , 62 L.Ed.2d 90 (1979) (violation of Nevada statute requiring mine owner to keep shaft in good repair was not sufficient to constitute of "willful or malicious failure to guard or warn").
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Fischbach & Moore, Inc.
See United States v. Gillen, 599 F.2d 541 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 866 , 100 S.Ct. 137 , 62 L.Ed.2d 89 (1979).
cited
Cited "see"
Taylor v. Sentry Life Insurance
See Gard v. United States, 594 F.2d 1230, 1235 (9th Cir.1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 866 , 100 S.Ct. 138 , 62 L.Ed.2d 90 (1979).
discussed
Cited "see"
Taylor v. Sentry Life Insurance Company
See Gard v. United States, 594 F.2d 1230, 1235 (9th Cir.1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 866 , 100 S.Ct. 138 , 62 L.Ed.2d 90 (1979). 14 Taylor claims that she did not raise these two issues with the appropriate specificity below because Sentry failed to respond to her requests for discovery.
cited
Cited "see"
Rainbow Pioneer 44-18-04a, a General Partnership v. Hawaii-Nevada Investment Corporation, a Nevada Corporation, and Herman B. Rothbard
See Gard v. United States, 594 F.2d 1230, 1235 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 866 , 100 S.Ct. 138 , 62 L.Ed.2d 90 (1979).
discussed
Cited "see"
Board of Equalization v. Alaska Native Brotherhood & Sisterhood, Camp No. 14
(2×)
See Mashpee Tribe v. New Seabury Corp., 592 F.2d 575 , 586-87 n. 6, 589 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 866 , 100 S.Ct. 138 , 62 L.Ed.2d 90 (1979).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Felter
Accord, Mashpee Tribe v. New Seabury Corp., 592 F.2d 575, 586-587 (2d Cir. 1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 866 , 100 S.Ct. 138 , 62 L.Ed.2d 90 (1980); see also Delaware Tribal Bus.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Columbia Broadcasting System, Inc.
Accord In Re Irving, 600 F.2d 1027 , 1032 (2d Cir.), cert. denied sub. nom, Di Lapi v. Irving, 444 U.S. 866 , 100 S.Ct. 137 , 62 L.Ed.2d 89 (1979); Kaufman v. Edelstein, 539 F.2d 811, 813-14 (2d Cir. 1976); North Carolina Ass’n of Black Lawyers v. North Carolina Board of Law Examiners, 538 F.2d 547 , 548—49 (4th Cir. 1976); Borden Co. v. Sylk, 410 F.2d 843 (3d Cir. 1969).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States of America, and Columbia Pictures Industries, Inc., Gulf and Western Industries, Inc., McA Inc., Twentieth Century-Fox Film Corporation and Warner Communications, Inc., Witnesses/appellants v. Columbia Broadcasting System, Inc., United States of America, and Columbia Pictures Industries, Inc., Gulf and Western Industries, Inc., McA Inc., Twentieth Century-Fox Film Corporation and Warner Communications, Inc., Witnesses/appellants v. American Broadcasting Companies, Inc.
Accord In Re Irving, 600 F.2d 1027 , 1032 (2d Cir.), cert. denied sub. nom, Di Lapi v. Irving, 444 U.S. 866 , 100 S.Ct. 137 , 62 L.Ed.2d 89 (1979); Kaufman v. Edelstein, 539 F.2d 811, 813-14 (2d Cir. 1976); North Carolina Ass'n of Black Lawyers v. North Carolina Board of Law Examiners, 538 F.2d 547, 548-49 (4th Cir. 1976); Borden Co. v. Sylk, 410 F.2d 843 (3d Cir. 1969) In contrast to the procedure applicable to a nonparty, a party's ability to seek review is contingent upon the court punishing non-compliance with criminal, rather than merely civil, contempt sanctions.
discussed
Cited "see"
UNITED STATES of America v. Arthur S. LOWELL, Appellant
See United States v. Gillen, 599 F.2d 541, 547-48 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 866 , 100 S.Ct. 137 , 62 L.Ed.2d 89 (1979); United States v. D’Andrea, 585 F.2d 1351 , 1355 n.3 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 983 , 99 S.Ct. 1795 , 60 L.Ed.2d 244 (1978); United States v. Abraham, 541 F.2d 1234 , 1237 & n.3 (7th Cir. 1976), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1102 , 97 S.Ct. 1128 , 51 L.Ed.2d 553 (1977); United States v. Cohen, 516 F.2d 1358, 1364-65 (8th Cir. 1975); Reisman v. United States, 409 F.2d 789, 792-93 (9th Cir. 1969).
cited
Cited "see"
Quinto v. Legal Times of Washington, Inc.
See Gard v. United States, 594 F.2d 1230, 1232 (9th Cir.) cert. denied, 444 U.S. 866 , 100 S.Ct. 138 , 62 L.Ed.2d 90 (1979).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Richard Seelig, Terry Hawkins, and Donald Primmer
See United States v. Hayes, 595 F.2d 258, 259 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 866 , 100 S.Ct. 138 , 62 L.Ed.2d 89 (1979); United States v. Roya, 574 F.2d 386, 390 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 857 , 99 S.Ct. 172 , 58 L.Ed.2d 165 (1978); United States v. Pastor, 557 F.2d 930, 939 (2d Cir. 1977); United States v. Rosenberg, 515 F.2d 190, 196-97 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 1031 , 96 S.Ct. 562 , 46 L.Ed.2d 404 (1975); United States v. Green, 511 F.2d 1062, 1069-70 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 1031 , 96 S.Ct. 561 , 46 L.Ed.2d 404 (1975); United States v. Larson, 507 F.2d 385, 3…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
American Automobile Manufacturers Ass'n v. Commissioner, Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection
Id.; see also Mashpee Tribe v. New Seabury Corp., 592 F.2d 575, 579 (1st Cir.) (setting forth three-prong test for primary jurisdiction), ce rt. denied, 444 U.S. 866 , 100 S.Ct. 138 , 62 L.Ed.2d 90 (1979).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Western Shoshone Business Council v. Babbitt
See also Mashpee Tribe v. New Seabury Corp., 592 F.2d 575, 582 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 866 , 100 S.Ct. 138 , 62 L.Ed.2d 90 (1979); Joint Tribal Council of the Passamaquoddy Tribe v. Morton, 528 F.2d 370 , 377 n. 8 (1st Cir.1975). 17 The Western Shoshones argue that by this standard they are a recognized tribe for purposes of 25 U.S.C.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Western Shoshone Business Council ex rel. Western Shoshone Tribe of the Duck Valley Reservation v. Babbitt
See also Mashpee Tribe v. New Seabury Corp., 592 F.2d 575, 582 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 866 , 100 S.Ct. 138 , 62 L.Ed.2d 90 (1979); Joint Tribal Council of the Passamaquoddy Tribe v. Morton, 528 F.2d 370 , 377 n. 8 (1st Cir.1975).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Maynard v. Narragansett Tribe
(2×)
See, e.g., Mashpee Tribe v. New Seabury Corp., 592 F.2d 575 , 582 n.4 See, e.g., Mashpee Tribe v. New Seabury Corp., 592 F.2d 575 , 582 n.4 ___ ____ ______________ _________________ (1st Cir.) (protective statutes enacted for benefit of Indian tribes (1st Cir.) (protective statutes enacted for benefit of Indian tribes are liberally construed in their favor), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 866 are liberally construed in their favor), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 866 _____ ______ 3 even alludes to the concept of tribal sovereign immunity, much less its relinquishment.*** The Tribe's surrender of its right to …
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Kenneth L. Maynard v. Narragansett Indian Tribe
See, e.g., Mashpee Tribe v. New Seabury Corp., 592 F.2d 575 , 582 n. 4 (1st Cir.) (protective statutes enacted for benefit of Indian tribes are liberally construed in their favor), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 866 , 100 S.Ct. 138 , 62 L.Ed.2d 90 (1979). 3 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Maynard v. Narragansett Tribe
See, e.g., Mashpee Tribe v. New Seabury Corp., 592 F.2d 575 , 582 n.4 (1st Cir.) (protective statutes enacted for benefit of Indian tribes are liberally construed in their favor), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 866 3 even alludes to the concept of tribal sovereign immunity, much less its relinquishment.*** The Tribe's surrender of its right to sue for non-settlement lands neither says nor implies anything about a surrender of its sovereign immunity from suit relating to its territo- rial or extraterritorial actions.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
1992-1 Trade Cases P 69,879, 36 Fed. R. Evid. Serv. 214 United States of America v. Misle Bus & Equipment Company, United States of America v. Darrell Bennett, United States of America v. Julius Misle
See, e.g., United States v. Gillen, 599 F.2d 541, 547 (3d Cir.) ("When a company president has knowledge that his company is involved in a price-fixing conspiracy and takes no action to stop it, he may not insulate himself from liability by leaving the actual execution of the scheme to his subordinates."), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 866 , 100 S.Ct. 137 , 62 L.Ed.2d 89 (1979). 31 Bennett separately argues that the district court erred in instructing the jury on withdrawal from a conspiracy. 6 According to Bennett, the district court should have found that he had withdrawn from the conspiracy as a m…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Misle Bus & Equipment Co.
See, e.g., United States v. Gillen, 599 F.2d 541, 547 (3d Cir.) (“When a company president has knowledge that his company is involved in a price-fixing conspiracy and takes no action to stop it, he may not insulate himself from liability by leaving the actual execution of the scheme to his subordinates.”), cert, denied, 444 U.S. 866 , 100 S.Ct. 137 , 62 L.Ed.2d 89 (1979).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Manning v. Barenz
See, e.g., Gard v. United States, 594 F.2d 1230 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 866 , 100 S. Ct. 138 , 62 L.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Alaska ex rel. Yukon Flats School District v. Native Village of Venetie
See, e.g., Mashpee Tribe v. New Seabury Corp., 592 F.2d 575, 582-88 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 866 , 100 S.Ct. 138 , 62 L.Ed.2d 90 (1979).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State of Alaska v. Native Village of Venetie
See, e.g., Mashpee Tribe v. New Seabury Corp., 592 F.2d 575, 582-88 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 866 , 100 S.Ct. 138 , 62 L.Ed.2d 90 (1979). 12 Once tribal status is determined, other considerations arise.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
A. Illum Hansen, Inc. v. Tiana Queen Motel, Inc.
See also In re Irving, 600 F.2d 1027, 1033 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 866 , 100 S.Ct. 137 , 62 L.Ed.2d 89 (1979).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In Re Tiana Queen Motel, Inc., Todem Homes, Inc., Anthony Demarco, Debtors. A. Illum Hansen, Inc. v. Tiana Queen Motel, Inc., Todem Homes, Inc., Anthony Demarco, Defendants- in Re Petition for Writ of Mandamus. A. Illum Hansen, Inc., Stanley Weisz, Phyllis H. Weisz and Stanley Weisz, P.C. Retirement Plan v. Anthony Demarco
See also In re Irving, 600 F.2d 1027, 1033 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 866 , 100 S.Ct. 137 , 62 L.Ed.2d 89 (1979). 42 Petitioners (the secured creditors and the Chapter 7 trustee), who are apparently not now defendants in the Sec. 1983 action, assert that they meet these strict standards.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. State Of Washington
See also Elser v. Gill Net Number One, 246 Cal.App.2d 30, 38 , 54 Cal.Rptr. 568, 575 (1966) ("tribe," applied to California Indians, must " 'be understood as synonymous with "ethnic group" rather than as denoting political unity' " because tribes in the political sense did not exist in California when Indian fishing rights statute was adopted). 7 "(I)f a group of Indians has a set of legal rights by virtue of its status as a tribe, then it ought not to lose those rights absent a voluntary decision made by the tribe and its guardian, Congress, on its behalf." Mashpee Tribe v. New Seabury Corp.,…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Washington
See also Elser v. Gill Net Number One, 246 Cal.App.2d 30, 38 , 54 Cal.Rptr. 568, 575 (1966) (“tribe,” applied to California Indians, must “ ‘be understood as synonymous with “ethnic group” rather than as denoting political unity’ ” because tribes in the political sense did not exist in California when Indian fishing rights statute was adopted). . “[I]f a group of Indians has a set of legal rights by virtue of its status as a tribe, then it ought not to lose those rights absent a voluntary decision made by the tribe and its guardian, Congress, on its behalf.” Mashpee Tribe v…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
DiLapi
v.
Irving, General Counsel, National Labor Relations Board
v.
Irving, General Counsel, National Labor Relations Board
No. 79-51.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 1, 1979.
Cited by 1 opinion | Published
Citer courts: D. Massachusetts (1)
C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.