green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
5.9 score
“it has long been part of our law that a party cannot raise an issue on appeal to a court when it failed to raise it before an administrative agency competent to hear it.”
Treatment trajectory · 1980 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1980
2003
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 16 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Walden v. United States
it has long been part of our law that a party cannot raise an issue on appeal to a court when it failed to raise it before an administrative agency competent to hear it.
cited
Cited "see"
Bonewell v. United States
See Doyle v. U.S., 220 Ct.Cl. 285, 311 , 599 F.2d 984 (1979), cert. den. 446 U.S. 982 , 100 S.Ct. 2961 , 64 L.Ed.2d 837 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Gavin v. United States
See Doyle v. United States, 220 Ct.Cl. 285 , 599 F.2d 984, 1000 , amended by, 220 Ct.Cl. 326 , 609 F.2d 990 (1979), cert. denied, 446 U.S. 982 , 100 S.Ct. 2961 , 64 L.Ed.2d 837 (1980) (concluding that a service member cannot raise an issue on appeal to a court when she failed to raise it before an administrative agency competent to hear it).
cited
Cited "see"
Roane v. United States
See Doyle v. United States, 220 Ct.Cl. 285 , 599 F.2d 984 (1979) (en banc), cert. denied, 446 U.S. 982 , 100 S.Ct. 2961 , 64 L.Ed.2d 837 (1980).
cited
Cited "see"
National Taxpayers Union, Inc. v. United States
See Investment Annuity, Inc. v. Blumenthal, 609 F.2d 1, 4 (D.C.Cir.1979), cert. denied, 446 U.S. 981 , 100 S.Ct. 2961 , 64 L.Ed.2d 837 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see"
Pasternack v. United States
See Doyle v. United States, 220 Ct.Cl. 285, 311 , 599 F.2d 984, 1000 (1979), cert. denied, 446 U.S. 982 , 100 S.Ct. 2961 , 64 L.Ed.2d 837 (1980); Grant Associates, Inc. v. United States, 11 Cl.Ct. 816, 825 (1987).
cited
Cited "see"
Palmer v. United States
See Doyle v. United States, 220 Ct.Cl. 285 , 599 F.2d 984 , modified, 609 F.2d 990 (1979), cert. denied, 446 U.S. 982 , 100 S.Ct. 2961 , 64 L.Ed.2d 837 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see"
Holderbaum v. United States
See Investment Annuity Inc. v. Blumenthal, 609 F.2d 1, 9 (D.C.Cir.1979), cert. denied, 446 U.S. 981 , 100 S.Ct. 2961 , 64 L.Ed.2d 837 (1980); John A. Voss and Sharon Voss v. United States, supra. Accordingly, Respondent’s Motion To Dismiss Petition For Injunctive Relief should be GRANTED.
discussed
Cited "see"
Ecclesiastical Order of the Ism of Am, Inc. v. Internal Revenue Service
See, Investment Annuity, Inc. v. Blumenthal, 609 F.2d 1, 4 (D.C.Cir.1979), cert. denied sub nom., Investment Annuity Inc. v. Miller, 446 U.S. 981 , 100 S.Ct. 2961 , 64 L.Ed.2d 837 (1980); Lugo v. Simon, 453 F.Supp. at 690 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Ecclesiastical Order Of The Ism Of Am, Inc. v. Internal Revenue Service
See, Investment Annuity, Inc. v. Blumenthal, 609 F.2d 1, 4 (D.C.Cir.1979), cert. denied sub nom., Investment Annuity Inc. v. Miller, 446 U.S. 981 , 100 S.Ct. 2961 , 64 L.Ed.2d 837 (1980); Lugo v. Simon, 453 F.Supp. at 690 .
cited
Cited "see"
Voss v. United States
See Investment *960 Annuity Inc. v. Blumenthal, 609 F.2d 1, 9 (D.C.Cir.1979), cert. denied, 446 U.S. 981 , 100 S.Ct. 2961 , 64 L.Ed.2d 837 (1980).
cited
Cited "see"
Walton v. Lehman
See Doyle v. United States, 599 F.2d 984, 1000 (Ct.Cl.1979), cert. denied, 446 U.S. 982 , 100 S.Ct. 2961 , 64 L.Ed.2d 837 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see"
Hardison v. Alexander
(2×)
also: Cited "see, e.g."
See Doyle v. United States, 599 F.2d 984, 990 (Ct.Cl.1979), cert. denied, 446 U.S. 982 , 100 S.Ct. 2961 , 64 L.Ed.2d 837 (1980). . 10 U.S.C. § 1552 (1976). .
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
National Federation of Republican Assemblies v. United States
See, e.g., Investment Annuity, Inc. v. Blumenthal, 609 F.2d 1, 4 (D.C.Cir.1979), cert. denied, 446 U.S. 981 , 100 S.Ct. 2961 , 64 L.Ed.2d 837 (1980). 5 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Harris v. United States
Failure to Exhaust Administrative Remedies The plaintiff challenged the 1978 OER before the AFBCMR, but did not raise the issue of the new Air Force regulation. “[Tjhis court has established a general rule that failure to present an issue before the [administrative board] amounts to a failure by the plaintiff to exhaust his administrative remedy on that question, thus precluding him from seeking relief in this court on that specific ground.” Haynes v. United States, 190 Ct.Cl. 9, 12 , 418 F.2d 1380, 1382 (1969) (citations omitted); see also Doyle v. United States, 220 Ct.Cl. 285, 311 , 599…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Joseph S. Neal v. Secretary of the Navy and Commandant of the Marine Corps
See, e. g., Doyle v. United States, 599 F.2d 984, 993-94 (Ct.Cl.1979), cert. denied, 446 U.S. 982 , 100 S.Ct. 2961 , 64 L.Ed.2d 837 (1980); Ricker v. United States, 396 F.2d 454, 456-57 (Ct.Cl.1968); Henderson v. United States, 175 Ct.Cl. 690, 699 (1966), cert. denied, 386 U.S. 1016 , 87 S.Ct. 1373 , 18 L.Ed.2d 455 (1967).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
First Investment Annuity Company of America
v.
Miller, Secretary of the Treasury and Investment Annuity, Inc. v. Miller, Secretary of the Treasury
v.
Miller, Secretary of the Treasury and Investment Annuity, Inc. v. Miller, Secretary of the Treasury
No. 79-1280; No. 79-1281.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 2, 1980.
Cited by 7 opinions | Published
Citer courts: Court of Claims (1)
C. A. D. C. Cir. Cer-tiorari denied. Reported below: 197 U. S. App. D. C. 235, 609 F. 2d 1.