green
Positive treatment
6.4 score
Treatment trajectory · 1980 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1980
2003
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 17 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Marine Office of America Corp. v. Lilac Marine Corp.
See, Hector Martinez & Co. v. Southern Pacific Transp., 606 F.2d 106, 110 (5th Cir.), reh. denied, 609 F.2d 1008 (1979), cert. denied, 446 U.S. 982 , 100 S.Ct. 2962 , 64 L.Ed.2d 838 (1980); Bosung Industrial Co. v. M.V.
discussed
Cited "see"
96 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 3162, 96 Daily Journal D.A.R. 6933 Bicycle Trails Council of Marin, a California Nonprofit Corporation Bicycle Trails Council of the East Bay, a California Nonprofit Corporation International Mountain Bicycling Association, a California Nonprofit Corporation League of American Wheelmen, a Maryland Nonprofit Corporation v. Bruce Babbitt, Secretary of the Interior James M. Ridenour, Director of the National Park Service Brian O'neill, General Superintendent of the Golden Gate National Recreation Area, Bay Area Trails Preservation Council Marin Horse Council Tamalpais Conservation Club Sierra Club and National Parks and Conservation Association, All Nonprofit Corporations, Defendants-Intervenors-Appellees
(2×)
also: Cited "see, e.g."
See Wilderness Public Rights Fund v. Kleppe, 608 F.2d 1250, 1253-54 (9th Cir.1979)(treating as reviewable for arbitrariness an NPS action allocating a limited use between competing user groups)[, cert. denied, 446 U.S. 982 , 100 S.Ct. 2962 , 64 L.Ed.2d 838 (1980) ] Further if, as plaintiffs argue, the 1987 regulation were invalid, then the 1992 trail plan would have the effect of closing trails presumed open under the old version of the pertinent regulations (former 36 C.F.R. section 4.3).
discussed
Cited "see"
Bicycle Trails Council v. Babbitt
(2×)
also: Cited "see, e.g."
See Wilderness Public Rights Fund v. Kleppe, 608 F.2d 1250, 1253-54 (9th Cir.1979)(treating as reviewable for arbitrariness an NPS action allocating a limited use between competing user groups)[, cert. denied, 446 U.S. 982 , 100 S.Ct. 2962 , 64 L.Ed.2d 838 (1980)].
cited
Cited "see"
National Wildlife Federation v. Burford
See Wilderness Public Rights Fund v. Kleppe, 608 F.2d 1250, 1254 (9th Cir.1979), cert. denied, 446 U.S. 982 , 100 S.Ct. 2962 , 64 L.Ed.2d 838 (1980).
cited
Cited "see"
National Wildlife Federation v. Burford
See Wilderness Public Rights Fund v. Kleppe, 608 F.2d 1250, 1254 (9th Cir.1979), cert. denied, 446 U.S. 982 , 100 S.Ct. 2962 , 64 L.Ed.2d 838 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see"
Affiliated Foods, Inc. v. Puerto Rico Marine Management, Inc.
See Héctor Martinez & Co. v. Southern Pacific Transp., 606 F.2d 106, 110 (5th Cir.), reh. denied, 609 F.2d 1008 (1979), cert. denied, 446 U.S. 982 , 100 S.Ct. 2962 , 64 L.Ed.2d 838 (1980); Bosung Industrial Co. v. M.
discussed
Cited "see"
The Great American Houseboat Company, a California Corporation v. The United States of America, (u.s. Forest Service)
Accord Wilderness Public Rights Funds v. Kleppe, 608 F.2d 1250 , 1254 (9th Cir.1979) (provided there is a rational basis for a classification, there is a judicial presumption favoring the validity of administrative action taken pursuant thereto), cert. denied sub nom., 446 U.S. 982 , 100 S.Ct. 2962 , 64 L.Ed.2d 838 (1980).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Benjamin Bonam
See United States v. Beattie, 613 F.2d 762, 765-66 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 446 U.S. 982 , 100 S.Ct. 2962 , 64 L.Ed.2d 838 (1980).
cited
Cited "see"
National Wildlife Federation v. Burford
See Wilderness Public Rights Fund v. Kleppe, 608 F.2d 1250, 1254 (9th Cir.1979), cert. denied, 446 U.S. 982 , 100 S.Ct. 2962 , 64 L.Ed.2d 838 (1980).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Rowena Owen Garner
See United States v. Beattie, 613 F.2d 762, 764 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 446 U.S. 982 , 100 S.Ct. 2962 , 64 L.Ed.2d 838 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Clyde Smith
(2×)
See United States v. Stover, 565 F.2d 1010, 1016-17 (8th Cir. 1977); accord, United States v. Beattie, 613 F.2d 762, 765-66 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 446 U.S. 982 , 100 S.Ct. 2962 , 64 L.Ed.2d 838 (1980) (“Thus, an examination of the instruction under all the circumstances reveals no coercion.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Eural WILLS, II, Defendant-Appellant
In Lorenzo , we held that an Allen instruction was non-coercive where a supplemental Allen instruction was given after the jury indicated it could not reach a verdict and the jury deliberated for five and a half hours after the charge was given. 43 F.3d at 1307 n. 3; see also United States v. Beattie, 613 F.2d 762, 766 (9th Cir.) (holding that three and a half hours of additional deliberation after receiving a supplemental Allen charge was a significant indication of no coercion), cert. denied, 446 U.S. 982 , 100 S.Ct. 2962 , 64 *718 L.Ed.2d 838 (1980).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Stella Maudine Nickell
See, e.g., United States v. Beattie, 613 F.2d 762, 764 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 446 U.S. 982 , 100 S.Ct. 2962 , 64 L.Ed.2d 838 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Alvin Frazin, United States of America v. Ronald Mark Miller
See, e.g., United States v. Beattie, 613 F.2d 762, 765-66 (9th Cir.) (3‘/2 hours), cert. denied, 446 U.S. 982 , 100 S.Ct. 2962 , 64 L.Ed.2d 838 (1980); United States v. Moore, 653 F.2d 384, 390 (9th Cir.) (2 hours), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1102 , 102 S.Ct. 680 , 70 L.Ed.2d 646 (1981); United States v. Hooton, 662 F.2d 628, 637 (9th Cir.1981) (Allen charge given in the morning, verdict delivered early afternoon), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 1004 , 102 S.Ct. 1640 , 71 *1471 L.Ed.2d 873 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Nos. 83-1643, 83-1644
See, e.g., Eiseman v. Kleppe, 608 F.2d 1250, 1253 (9th Cir.1979), cert. denied, 446 U.S. 982 , 100 S.Ct. 2962 , 64 L.Ed.2d 838 (1980); Oahe Conservancy Sub-District v. Alexander, 493 F.Supp. 1294, 1302-03 (D.S.D.1980). 47 Failure to obtain necessary flowage easements 48 Finally, the district court concluded that large portions of the Floodway are unencumbered by the modified flowage easements required by the Flood Control Act of 1965, and that therefore the Corps could not proceed with the plan to artificially crevasse the levees. 49 The government alleges that it has obtained all flowage ease…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Story v. Marsh
See, e.g., Eiseman v. Kleppe, 608 F.2d 1250, 1253 (9th Cir.1979), cert. denied, 446 U.S. 982 , 100 S.Ct. 2962 , 64 L.Ed.2d 838 (1980); Oahe Conservancy Sub-District v. Alexander, 493 F.Supp. 1294, 1302-03 (D.S.D.1980).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Roy Moreno Ramirez, United States of America v. Robert H. Reynolds
Compare United States v. Beattie, 613 F.2d 762, 765 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 446 U.S. 982 , 100 S.Ct. 2962 , 64 L.Ed.2d 838 (1980) (no coercion where jury deliberated for three and one-half hours after Allen charge), with United States v. Contreras, 463 F.2d 773 (9th Cir.1972) (coercion found where jury deliberated only 35 minutes after Allen charge).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Southern Pacific Transportation Co.
v.
Hector Martinez & Co.
v.
Hector Martinez & Co.
No. 79-1432.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 2, 1980.
Published
C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.