green
Positive treatment
4.6 score
Treatment trajectory · 1981 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1981
2003
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 7 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Ramirez
See Hoo, 825 F.2d at 670 (interpreting juvenile as defined in 18 U.S.C. § 5031 to “apply only to criminal proceedings that begin before the defendant reaches the age of twenty-one”); see also United States v. Smith, 851 F.2d 706, 710 (4th Cir.1988) (concluding that jurisdiction under the JDA does not terminate when a defendant reaches the age of twenty-one); accord United States v. Doe, 631 F.2d 110, 113 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 867 , 101 S.Ct. 202 , 66 L.Ed.2d 86 (1980); United States v. Rivera, 912 F.Supp. 70, 75 (S.D.N.Y.1995).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Juan Ramirez, Also Known as \Tony Tko\"
See Hoo, 825 F.2d at 670 (interpreting juvenile as defined in 18 U.S.C. § 5031 to "apply only to criminal proceedings that begin before the defendant reaches the age of twenty-one"); see also United States v. Smith, 851 F.2d 706, 710 (4th Cir.1988) (concluding that jurisdiction under the JDA does not terminate when a defendant reaches the age of twenty-one); accord United States v. Doe, 631 F.2d 110, 113 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 867 , 101 S.Ct. 202 , 66 L.Ed.2d 86 (1980); United States v. Rivera, 912 F.Supp. 70, 75 (S.D.N.Y.1995). 27 In addition, in Smith and Doe, the Fourth and Nin…
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. John Doe
See United States v. Doe, 631 F.2d 110, 112-13 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 867 , 101 S.Ct. 202 , 66 L.Ed.2d 86 (1980); United States v. Brian N., 900 F.2d 218, 221 (10th Cir.1990).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Brian N. (A Juvenile Male), United States of America v. Craig J.B. (A Juvenile Male)
(2×)
See United States v. Doe, 631 F.2d 110, 112-13 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 867 , 101 S.Ct. 202 , 66 L.Ed.2d 86 (1980); In re Martin, 788 F.2d 696, 697-98 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 478 U.S. 1009 , 106 S.Ct. 3306 , 92 L.Ed.2d 719 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Won Tae Kim
See United States v. Gonzalez, 617 F.2d 104, 107 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 868 , 101 S.Ct. 202 , 66 L.Ed.2d 86 (1980); United States v. Brown, 348 F.2d 661, 662 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 382 U.S. 904 , 86 S.Ct. 240 , 15 L.Ed.2d 157 (1965).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Raymond Leroy Talkington
See United States v. Gonzalez, 617 F.2d 104, 106 (5th Cir.) (defendant hid roll of counterfeit bills while under arrest), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 868 , 101 S.Ct. 202 , 66 L.Ed.2d 86 (1980). 3 .
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Roger William Rice and James Gregory Williford
See Defendant's Exhibit 4 3 Since only defendant Rice used the $20 bill to purchase film, facts (3) and (5) supra are not relevant with regard to defendant Williford 4 "Furtive conduct" more appropriately applies to attempts to hide counterfeit money, see, e. g., United States v. Gonzalez, 617 F.2d 104 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 101 S.Ct. 202 , 66 L.Ed.2d 86 (1980), than to simply giving a false name to police officers.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Abu-Bakr, aka King
v.
Costello
v.
Costello
No. 79-6881.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 6, 1980.
Published
C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.