green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 2×
8.2 score
G Cite
cited 2× by 1 distinct case, last quoted 1986 ·
…whether ... evidentiary exhibits properly admitted should or should not accompany the jury to the jury room is a discretionary matter for the trial court.
⚠ not in text
Treatment trajectory · 1981 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1981
2003
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 14 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "but see"
United States v. Grabinski
But see United States v. Crowhurst, 629 F.2d 1297 (9th Cir.) (a signed 1040 form with W-2 forms attached is a return for purposes of filing a false return in violation of § 7206(1) even though the form is blank), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1021 , 101 S.Ct. 587 , 66 L.Ed.2d 482 (1980).
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
United States v. Acosta
it is well settled that observations made by law enforcement officials from the common areas of multi-unit dwellings ordinarily do not violate a resident's reasonable expectation of privacy
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
United States v. Mahomud Rawwad
(2×)
whether ... evidentiary exhibits properly admitted should or should not accompany the jury to the jury room is a discretionary matter for the trial court.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Donald P. Rohrig
(2×)
See United States v. Acevedo, 627 F.2d 68, 70 (7th Cir.) (“[T]he limitless array of factual settings that may arise caution against a checklist-type analysis.”), ce rt. denied, 449 U.S. 1021 , 101 S.Ct. 587 , 66 L.Ed.2d 482 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Kenneth Charles Fragoso
Gonzalez, 700 F.2d at 200 (jury instructed that it could convict Gonzales if he “knew that there was some controlled substance in the car, whether or not he knew it was actually heroin or some other drug or narcotic”); see United States v. Rada-Solano, 625 F.2d 577, 579 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1021 , 101 S.Ct. 588 , 66 L.Ed.2d 482 (1980).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. William W. Boden
See United States v. Acevedo, 627 F.2d 68 , 69 n. 1 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1021 , 101 S.Ct. 587 , 66 L.Ed.2d 482 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Cattouse
See United States v. Acevedo, 627 F.2d 68, 71 (7th Cir.), cert. denied 449 U.S. 1021 , 101 S.Ct. 587 , 66 L.Ed.2d 482 (1980); Donaldson, supra, 606 F.Supp. at 332 . *487 For these reasons, although I do not find there was a “likelihood” that Cattouse would have escaped — or even simply left unnoticed — in the 20-30 minutes it would have taken to secure a telephone warrant, I also believe the agents were faced with a growing danger of escape or hostile confrontation.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Steven Sawyer, Harvey M. Bloch, Allen C. Leavitt
(2×)
See United States v. Stone, 472 F.2d 909, 914 (5th Cir.1973) (such conduct on part of prosecutor was a “breach of propriety”), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1020 , 101 S.Ct. 586 , 66 L.Ed.2d 482 (1980); United States v. Killian, 524 F.2d 1268, 1275 (5th Cir.1975) (prosecutor’s remark referred to as “improper conduct”), cert. denied, 425 U.S. 935 , 96 S.Ct. 1667 , 48 L.Ed.2d 177 (1976).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Brian G. Altman
See United States v. Acevedo, 627 F.2d 68 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1021 , 101 S.Ct. 587 , 66 L.Ed.2d 482 (1980); United States v. Moore, 790 F.2d 13 (1st Cir.1986); United States v. Wulferdinger, 782 F.2d 1473 (9th Cir.1986); United States v. Hicks, 752 F.2d 379 (9th Cir.1985); see generally Project, Fifteenth Annual Review of Criminal Procedure: United States Supreme Court and Courts of Appeals 1984-85, 74 Geo.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Riad Abed Al-Azzawy
(2×)
See United States v. Williams, 626 F.2d 697, 703 (9th Cir.) (possibility of bomb in car “is an exigent circumstance sufficient to justify an immediate [warrantless] search”), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1020 , 101 S.Ct. 586 , 66 L.Ed.2d 482 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Williams
See United States v. Acevedo, 627 F.2d 68 , 69 n. 1 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1021 , 101 S.Ct. 587 , 66 L.Ed.2d 482 (1980); United States v. Luschen, 614 F.2d 1164, 1173 (8th Cir. 1980); United States v. Penco, 612 F.2d 19, 24-25 (2d Cir.1979); United States v. Eisler, 567 F.2d 814, 816 (8th Cir.1977); United States v. Shima, 545 F.2d 1026, 1029 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 996 , 98 S.Ct. 632 , 54 L.Ed.2d 490 (1977); United States v. Calhoun, 542 F.2d 1094, 1100 (9th Cir. 1976), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1064 , 97 S.Ct. 792 , 50 L.Ed.2d 781 (1977); United States v. Cruz Pagan, 537 …
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Sullivan
(2×)
See United States v. Williams, 626 F.2d 697, 703 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1020 , 101 S.Ct. 586 , 66 L.Ed.2d 482 (1980); United States v. Chadwick, 443 U.S. 1 , 15 n.9, 97 S.Ct. 2476 , 2485 n.9, 53 L.Ed.2d 538 (1977) (dictum) [“If officers have reason to believe that luggage contains some immediately dangerous instrumentality, such as explosives, it would be foolhardy to transport it to the station house without opening the luggage and disarming the weapon.”] 17 There is no requirement that a search warrant be obtained prior to inspecting a container for explosives, since a self-d…
examined
Cited "see, e.g."
Montoya v. Scott
(4×)
See United States v. Warren, 594 F.2d 1046, 1050 (5th Cir.1979) (noting that court's instruction to jury to continue deliberating, in response to two notes suggesting jury was deadlocked, was not traditional Allen charge); see also United States v. Williams, 626 F.2d 697, 704 (9th Cir.1980) (holding that court's restatement of its instructions after jury notified trial judge of its inability to reach a verdict was not modified Allen charge), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1020 , 101 S.Ct. 586 , 66 L.Ed.2d 482 (1980).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Charles Reardon and Gregory Heinzel v. Gary Wroan, Ralph Ebert and Steve Ploense
Llaguno, 763 F.2d at 1564 ; see also United States v. Acevedo, 627 F.2d 68, 70 (7th Cir.), certiorari denied, 449 U.S. 1021 , 101 S.Ct. 587 , 66 L.Ed.2d 482 (1980).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Pelczarski
v.
Southeastern Bank & Trust Co.
v.
Southeastern Bank & Trust Co.
No. 80-5594.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Dec 1, 1980.
Published
Citer courts: First Circuit (2)
C. A. 1st Cir. Certiorari denied.