Bennett v. United States, 452 U.S. 966 (1981). · Go Syfert
Search
Bennett v. United States, 452 U.S. 966 (1981). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
57 citation events across 17 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: United States v. Scott Faul, United States of America v. Yorie Von Kahl, United States of America v. David Ronald Broer A/K/A David Ronald Brewer (ca8, 1985-01-03)
Treatment trajectory · 1982 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1982 2004 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 10 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Scott Faul, United States of America v. Yorie Von Kahl, United States of America v. David Ronald Broer A/K/A David Ronald Brewer (2×)
8th Cir. · 1985 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Brim, 630 F.2d 1307, 1310 (8th Cir.1980), cert. denied, 452 U.S. 966 , 101 S.Ct. 3121 , 69 L.Ed.2d 980 (1981); United States v. Jackson, 549 F.2d 517, 523 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 430 U.S. 985 , 97 S.Ct. 1682 , 52 L.Ed.2d 236 (1977).
discussed Cited "see" United States v. David H. Bell
8th Cir. · 1984 · signal: see · confidence high
United States v. Wilber, supra, 696 F.2d at 80 ; United States v. Rickman, 638 F.2d 182, 183 (10th Cir.1980) (Privacy Act notice in IRS booklets for 1975 and 1976 are adequate); see United States v. Annunziato, 643 F.2d 676, 678 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 452 U.S. 966 , 101 S.Ct. 3121 , 69 L.Ed.2d 979 (1981), (citing Rickman and holding that the Privacy Act notice in W-4 statements is sufficient); Field v. Brown, 610 F.2d 981, 987-988 (D.C.Cir.), cert. denied, 446 U.S. 939 , 100 S.Ct. 2160 , 64 L.Ed.2d 792 (1979) (regulations which warn that the Department of Justice would be notified if inform…
cited Cited "see" United States v. Calvin Gomez, Jr.
8th Cir. · 1984 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Brim, 630 F.2d 1307, 1311 (8th Cir.1980), cert. denied, 452 U.S. 966 , 101 S.Ct. 3121 , 69 L.Ed.2d 980 (1981).
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Scott
N.D.W. Va. · 1983 · signal: see · confidence high
See U.S. v. Brim, 630 F.2d 1307 (8th Cir.1980) cert. denied 452 U.S. 966 , 101 S.Ct. 3121 , 69 L.Ed.2d 980 (1981). 5 A number of other courts have implicitly rejected the Defendant’s “but for” construction in favor of a broad automatic exclusion of the lapse between the filing of any pretrial motions until they are “submitted” for decision.
cited Cited "see" United States v. Alan K. Stuart
8th Cir. · 1982 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Brim, 630 F.2d 1307, 1312-13 (8th Cir. 1980), cert. denied, 452 U.S. 966 , 101 S.Ct. 3121 , 69 L.Ed.2d 980 (1981).
cited Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Thomas Nesbitt
7th Cir. · 1988 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also United States v. Brim, 630 F.2d 1307, 1313 (8th Cir.1980), cert. denied, 452 U.S. 966 , 101 S.Ct. 3121 , 69 L.Ed.2d 980 (1981).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Lueth
8th Cir. · 1986 · signal: see also · confidence low
We have characterized this type of result before as “convincing evidence that the jury was able to separate the proof as to each defendant.” Reed, 658 F.2d at 630 ; see also United States v. Brim, 630 F.2d 1307, 1310 (8th Cir.1980), cert. denied, 452 U.S. 966 , 101 S.Ct. 3121 , 69 L.Ed.2d 980 (1981).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Amel F. Lueth, United States of America v. Patrick J. McMahon United States of America v. Susan M. Lueth, United States of America v. Timothy M. McCarthy
8th Cir. · 1986 · signal: see also · confidence low
We have characterized this type of result before as "convincing evidence that the jury was able to separate the proof as to each defendant." Reed, 658 F.2d at 630 ; see also United States v. Brim, 630 F.2d 1307, 1310 (8th Cir.1980), cert. denied, 452 U.S. 966 , 101 S.Ct. 3121 , 69 L.Ed.2d 980 (1981).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." United States v. H. Wesley Robinson, Leo W. Wilson, and Irwin W. Milliken
8th Cir. · 1985 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also United States v. Brim, 630 F.2d 1307, 1310 (8th Cir.1980), cert. denied, 452 U.S. 966 , 101 S.Ct. 3121 , 69 L.Ed.2d 980 (1981); United States v. Swarek, 656 F.2d 331 , 337 n. 4 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1034 , 102 S.Ct. 573 , 70 L.Ed.2d 478 (1981); United States v. Boyd, 610 F.2d 521, 525 (8th Cir.1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1089 , 100 S.Ct. 1052 , 62 L.Ed.2d 777 (1980).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." United States v. David B. Wilber
8th Cir. · 1982 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also United States v. Annunziato, 643 F.2d 676, 678 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 452 U.S. 966 , 101 S.Ct. 3121 , 69 L.Ed.2d 979 (1981) (citing Rickman and holding that the Priva cy Act notice in W-4 statements is sufficient); Field v. Brown, 198 U.S.App.D.C. 39 , 610 F.2d 981, 987-988 (1979), cert. denied, 446 U.S. 939 , 100 S.Ct. 2160 , 64 L.Ed.2d 792 (1979) (substantive requirements of Privacy Act were satisfied by regulations which warned that the Department of Justice would be notified if information was not provided).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Bennett
v.
United States
No. 80-6752.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 22, 1981.
452 U.S. 966
Published

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.