Karmann v. United States, 454 U.S. 852 (1981). · Go Syfert
Search
Karmann v. United States, 454 U.S. 852 (1981). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
68 citation events (1 in the last 25 years) across 6 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Butler v. United States (dc, 1992-07-21)
Treatment trajectory · 1982 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1982 2004 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 7 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" Butler v. United States
D.C. · 1992 · signal: see · confidence high
See Carpenter v. United States, 430 A.2d 496, 504 (D.C.) (en banc), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 852 , 102 S.Ct. 295 , 70 L.Ed.2d 143 (1981) (redaction of co-defendant’s statement is a permissible way of avoiding Bruton problems).
discussed Cited "see" Moore v. State (2×)
Md. Ct. Spec. App. · 1987 · signal: see · confidence high
See Wilkerson v. United States, 427 A.2d 923, 924 (D.C.), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 852 , 102 S.Ct. 295 , 70 L.Ed.2d 143 (1981) (arresting officer noted that defendant was not walking in the direction of place where he stated he was going and in fact had walked passed the street leading to the most direct route).
cited Cited "see" Payne v. United States
D.C. · 1986 · signal: see · confidence high
See Wilkerson v. United States, 427 A.2d 923, 927 (D.C.), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 852 , 102 S.Ct. 295 , 70 L.Ed.2d 143 (1981).
discussed Cited "see" Jones v. United States
D.C. · 1984 · signal: see · confidence high
See Carpenter v. United States, 430 A.2d 496, 501-503 (D.C.) (en banc), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 852 , 102 S.Ct. 295 , 70 L.Ed.2d 143 (1981). 7 Finally, appellant Britt argues that the trial court erred in not declaring a mistrial when the prosecutor asked the government’s witness Smith if he had taken notes of his conversation with Britt. 8 Appellant contends that the question improperly bolstered Smith’s unimpeached testimony with a prior consistent statement.
discussed Cited "see" Ready v. United States (2×)
D.C. · 1982 · signal: see · confidence high
Jennings v. United States, D.C.App., 431 A.2d 552, 556 (1981); see Carpenter v. United States, D.C.App., 430 A.2d 496, 502 (en banc) cert. denied, - U.S. -, 102 S.Ct. 295 , 70 L.Ed.2d 143 (1981); Johnson v. United States, D.C.App., 398 A.2d 354, 367 (1979).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Hunter
D.C. · 1997 · signal: see also · confidence low
Id. at 828 (emphasis added). 5 We reiterated only a few months ago that “[n]o reliability determination is required unless the trial court has determined that the eyewitness identification was unduly suggestive.” Scales v. United States, 687 A.2d 927 , 937 n. 15 (D.C.1996); see also Wilkerson v. United States, 427 A.2d 923, 926 (D.C.1981), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 852 , 102 S.Ct. 295 , 70 L.Ed.2d 143 (1981) (where a showup has not been shown to be unduly suggestive, the court need not evaluate its reliability).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Harris v. United States (2×)
D.C. · 1985 · signal: see also · confidence low
See id. at 398-99 (citing with approval State v. Moreno, 92 Ariz. 116 , 374 P.2d 872 (1962) (en banc)); see also Wilkerson v. United States, 427 A.2d 923, 927 (D.C.) (in rape prosecution, although identity was the critical issue, no abuse of discretion in admitting photographs of the victim’s body to establish element of force), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 852 , 102 S.Ct. 295 , 70 L.Ed.2d 143 (1981).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Karmann
v.
United States
No. 80-6849.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 5, 1981.
454 U.S. 852
Published

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.