green
Positive treatment
4.4 score
Treatment trajectory · 1982 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1982
2004
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 14 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "but see"
Southern Message Serv. v. LA. PUBLIC SERV. COM'N
Co. v. Illinois Commerce Comm'n, 95 Ill.2d 142 , 69 Ill.Dec. 78 , 447 N.E.2d 295 (1983); Appeal of Omni Communications, Inc., 122 N.H. 860 , 451 A.2d 1289 (1982); but see In re Williams, 626 P.2d 564 (Wyo.), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 896 , 102 S.Ct. 394 , 70 L.Ed.2d 211 (1981).
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Mt. States Tel. & Tel. Co. v. Pub. Serv. Com'n
Mountain Fuel Supply Company v. Public Service Commission of Wyoming, Wyo., 662 P.2d 878 (1983); McCulloch Gas Transmission Company v. Public Service Commission of Wyoming, Wyo., 627 P.2d 173 (1981); Appeal of Williams, Wyo., 626 P.2d 564 , cert. denied 454 U.S. 896 , 102 S.Ct. 394 , 70 L.Ed.2d 211 *630 (1981); Great Western Sugar Company v. Johnson, Wyo., 624 P.2d 1184 (1981); Matter of Rule Radiophone Service, Inc., Wyo., 621 P.2d 241 (1980); Sage Club, Inc. v. Employment Security Commission of Wyoming, Wyo., 601 P.2d 1306 (1979).
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
John Doe, Etc. v. A Corporation
(2×)
also: Cited "see, e.g."
Ct. 394, 70 L.Ed.2d 211 (1981), we recognized that a violation of Canon 4 may also be the premise of a Canon 9 disqualification.
discussed
Cited "see"
John S. Freund v. Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General
See Duncan v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc., 646 F2d 1020, 1027 (5th Cir. Unit B June 1, 1981) (“Whenever an attorney seeks to represent an interest adverse to that of a former client, the possibility arises that the attorney, whether intentionally or inadvertently, will reveal to his present client confidential information entrusted to him during his previous *1575 representation.”), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 895 , 102 S.Ct. 394 , 70 L.Ed.2d 211 (1981).
cited
Cited "see"
Carbo Ceramics, Inc. v. Norton-Alcoa Proppants
See In re American Airlines, supra at 614, citing Duncan v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, 646 F.2d 1020, 1028 (5th Cir.) cert. denied, 454 U.S. 895 , 102 S.Ct. 394 , 70 L.Ed.2d 211 (1981).
cited
Cited "see"
United States Postal Service v. Dallas County Appraisal District
See United States v. State Tax Comm’n, 645 F.2d 4, 5 (5th Cir. Unit A May), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 896 , 102 S.Ct. 394 , 70 L.Ed.2d 211 (1981). a.
cited
Cited "see"
US Postal Serv. v. DALLAS CTY. APP. D.
See United States v. State Tax Comm'n, 645 F.2d 4, 5 (5th Cir. Unit A May), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 896 , 102 S.Ct. 394 , 70 L.Ed.2d 211 (1981). a.
discussed
Cited "see"
Columbus Credit Co. v. Evans
See, generally, Note, Developments in the Law — Conflicts of Interests in the Legal Profession (1981), 94 Harv.L.Rev. 1244, 1315-1321, and Duncan v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc. (C.A.5, 1981), 646 F.2d 1020, 1027 , certiorari denied (1981), 454 U.S. 895 , 102 S.Ct. 394 , 70 L.Ed.2d 211 .
cited
Cited "see"
Olice C. Fields, Sr., and Willie Fai Fields v. Shelton Fertilizer Co., Inc.
See Milstead v. International Brotherhood of Teamsters, 580 F.2d 232, 235 (6th Cir.1978), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 996 , 102 S.Ct. 394 , 70 L.Ed.2d 211 (1981); Sawchik v. E.I.
discussed
Cited "see"
Aaron Pitts v. Frito-Lay, Inc., Bakery and Confectionary Workers' International Union of America, Detroit Bakers' Union Factory Local 326
See Milstead v. International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Local No. 957, 649 F.2d 395 (6th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 896 , 102 S.Ct. 394 , 70 L.Ed.2d 211 (1982); Milstead v. International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Local No. 957, 580 F.2d 232 (6th Cir.1978) cert. denied, 454 U.S. 896 , 102 S.Ct. 394 , 70 L.Ed.2d 211 (1982); Ruzicka v. General Motors Corp., 523 F.2d 306 (6th Cir.1975); Scott v. Local Union 377, International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen and Helpers, 548 F.2d 1244 (6th Cir.) (per curiam), cert. denied, 431 U.S. 968 , 97 S.Ct. 2927 , 53 L.Ed.2d 1064 (19…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Midlake on Big Boulder Lake, Condominium Ass'n v. Cappuccio
See Jackson v. Metropolitan Edison Co., 419 U.S. 345, 350 , 95 S.Ct. 449, 453-54 , 42 L.Ed.2d 477 (1974) (“The mere fact that a business is subject to state regulation does not itself convert its action into that of the state”); see also Murphy v. Harleysville Mutual Insurance Co., 282 Pa.Super. 244 , 422 A.2d 1097 (1980) , cert. denied 454 U.S. 896 , 102 S.Ct. 395 , 70 L.Ed.2d 211 (1981) .
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Cherion, Inc. v. Lattimore
See, e.g., Duncan v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc., 646 F.2d 1020, 1031 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 895 , 102 S.Ct. 394 , 70 L.Ed.2d 211 (1981).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Rentclub, Inc. v. Transamerica Rental Finance Corp.
See also Duncan v. Merrill Lynch, et al., 646 F.2d 1020 (5th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 895 , 102 S.Ct. 394 , 70 L.Ed.2d 211 (1981) (once former client proves that subject matters of present and prior representation are “substantially related”, court will irrebuttably presume that relevant confidential information was disclosed during former period of representation and disqualify that counsel from the case); Smalley Transportation Co. v. Prime Computer, Inc., 137 F.R.D. 397 (M.D.Fla.1991); Junger Utility and Paving v. Myers, 578 So.2d 1117, 1119 (Fla. 1st DCA 1989).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Ruff v. Ivey (In Re Global Video Communications Corp.)
See also Duncan v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, 646 F.2d 1020, 1028 (5th Cir. Unit B June 1981), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 895 , 102 S.Ct. 394 , 70 L.Ed.2d 211 (1981).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc.
v.
Duncan
v.
Duncan
No. 81-252.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 13, 1981.
Cited by 1 opinion | Published
C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.