C. Itoh & Co. v. Spiess, 454 U.S. 1130 (1982). · Go Syfert
Search
C. Itoh & Co. v. Spiess, 454 U.S. 1130 (1982). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
“in libel and slander cases generally, there is no particular causal connection between the proved fact (the making of a derogatory statement) and the presumed fact (the falsity of the statement). there is no particular reason to presume falsity.”
7 citation events across 4 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Merritt v. Thompson (In Re Thompson) (mieb, 1993-12-14)
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers. How cited ↗
examined Cited as authority (quoted) Merritt v. Thompson (In Re Thompson)
Bankr. E.D. Mich. · 1993 · signal: cf. · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence low
in libel and slander cases generally, there is no particular causal connection between the proved fact (the making of a derogatory statement) and the presumed fact (the falsity of the statement). there is no particular reason to presume falsity.
discussed Cited "see" Ruby Clark v. American Broadcasting Companies, Inc. (2×)
6th Cir. · 1982 · signal: see · confidence high
See Wilson v. Scripps-Howard Broadcasting Co., 642 F.2d 371 (6th Cir.), cert. granted, 454 U.S. 962 , 102 S.Ct. 500 , 70 L.Ed.2d 377 , cert. dismissed, - U.S. -, 102 S.Ct. 984 , 71 L.Ed.2d 119 (1981); Street v. National Broadcasting Co., 645 F.2d at 1234 .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
C. Itoh & Co. (America), Inc.
v.
Spiess
No. 81-928.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 5, 1982.
454 U.S. 1130
Published
1 passage pin-cited by 1 case
Pinpoint authority: bottom 57%
Citer courts: E.D. Michigan (1)

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari dismissed under this Court’s Rule 53.