green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 3×
6.6 score
G Cite
cited 2× by 2 distinct cases, last quoted 1985 ·
…appellate review of a district court's discretion is very limited. generally, an abuse of discretion only occurs where no reasonable person could take the view adopted by the trial court
⚠ not in text
Treatment trajectory · 1982 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1982
2004
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 12 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
United States ex rel. Woodard v. Tynan
appellate review of a district court's discretion is very limited. generally, an abuse of discretion only occurs where no reasonable person could take the view adopted by the trial court
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
United States v. Tynan
appellate review of a district court's discretion is very limited. generally, an abuse of discretion only occurs where no reasonable person could take the view adopted by the trial court
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Association for Reduction of Violence v. Frank A. Hall
we recognize the state's strong and legitimate interest in preserving the confidentiality of sources of information necessary for parole release decisions and in maintaining security and discipline within its institutions
cited
Cited "see"
Sterling Dicken Donald Harden, Edward H. Pennington v. John Ashcroft Board of Probation and Parole Dept. Of Corrections Cranston Mitchell Dick Moore
See Williams v. Board of Probation & Parole, 661 F.2d 697, 698 (8th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 993 , 102 S.Ct. 1621 , 71 L.Ed.2d 855 (1982).
cited
Cited "see"
Edward Parton v. Bill Armontrout, Edward Parton v. Bill Armontrout
See Williams v. Missouri Bd. of Probation & Parole, 661 F.2d 697, 699 (8th Cir.1981), ce rt. denied, 455 U.S. 993 , 102 S.Ct. 1621 , 71 L.Ed.2d 855 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see"
Sweat v. Miller Brewing Co.
See Williams v. General Motors Corp., 656 F.2d 120, 130 (5th Cir. Unit B 1981) (noting that evidence of employer’s intent to discriminate on the basis of age could be direct evidence, such as a paper with the notation “Lay-Off — Too Old” beside a plaintiff’s name, or circumstantial evidence such as statistics or evidence of employer subterfuge), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 943 , 102 S.Ct. 1621 , 71 L.Ed.2d 855 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see"
32 Fair empl.prac.cas. 384, 32 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 33,722 Donald A. Sweat, of the Will of Barbara C. Carlson v. Miller Brewing Company, a Wisconsin Corp.
See Williams v. General Motors Corp., 656 F.2d 120, 130 (5th Cir. Unit B 1981) (noting that evidence of employer's intent to discriminate on the basis of age could be direct evidence, such as a paper with the notation "Lay-Off--Too Old" beside a plaintiff's name, or circumstantial evidence such as statistics or evidence of employer subterfuge), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 943 , 102 S.Ct. 1621 , 71 L.Ed.2d 855 (1982). 11 This case is not similar to Anderson v. Savage Laboratories, Inc., 675 F.2d 1221 (11th Cir.1982), in which the employer introduced evidence that it had uniformly discharged a number…
discussed
Cited "see"
Marvin Coleman v. Casey County Board of Education, James B. Graham
See generally Harrington v. DeVito, 656 F.2d 264 (7th Cir. 1981) cert. denied - U.S. -, 102 S.Ct. 1621 , 71 L.Ed.2d 854 , 3696 (1982); United States v. Terminal Transport Co., Inc., 653 F.2d 1016 (5th Cir. 1981); Dunten v. Kibler, 518 F.Supp. 1146 (N.D.Ga.1981); Adams v. Mathis, 458 F.Supp. 302 (M.D.Ala.1978) aff’d 614 F.2d 42 (5th Cir. 1980) (per curiam); Hartmann v. Gaffney, 446 F.Supp. 809 (D.Minn.1977).
cited
Cited "see"
United States Ex Rel. Paul v. Henderson
See Wilson v. Meyer, 665 F.2d 118 (7th Cir. 1981), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 102 S.Ct. 1621 , 71 L.Ed.2d 855 (1982).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Huffington v. State
See, e.g., Wilson v. Meyer, 665 F.2d 118, 125 (7th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 993 , 102 S.Ct. 1621 , 71 L.Ed.2d 855 (1982); United States ex rel.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Jones v. Illinois Department of Rehabilitation Services
(2×)
See, e.g., Harrington v. De Vito, 656 F.2d 264 , 269 (7th Cir. 1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 993 , 102 S.Ct. 1621 , 71 L.Ed.2d 854 (1982) (fee award under 42 U.S.C. § 1988 ). 8 Jones contends that the trial court abused its discretion because, although it adverted to the factors for evaluating fees claims set by this court in Muscare v. Quinn, 614 F.2d 577, 579 (7th Cir. 1980) (adopting test of Waters v. Wisconsin Steel Works, 502 F.2d 1309 , 1322 (7th Cir. 1974), cert. denied, 425 U.S. 997 , 96 S.Ct. 2214 , 48 L.Ed.2d 823 (1976), in § 1988 cases), it offered no analysis of them, and did not…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Charles P. Jones, Cross-Appellant v. Illinois Department of Rehabilitation Services and James S. Jeffers, in His Official Capacity as Director of the Illinois Department of Rehabilitation Services, Defendants- Cross-Appellees v. Illinois Institute of Technology and Dr. Thomas L. Martin, Jr., President
(2×)
See, e.g., Harrington v. De Vito, 656 F.2d 264 , 269 (7th Cir. 1981), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 102 S.Ct. 1621 , 71 L.Ed.2d 854 (1982) (fee award under 42 U.S.C. § 1988 ). 8 Jones contends that the trial court abused its discretion because, although it adverted to the factors for evaluating fees claims set by this court in Muscare v. Quinn, 614 F.2d 577, 579 (7th Cir. 1980) (adopting test of Waters v. Wisconsin Steel Works, 502 F.2d 1309 , 1322 (7th Cir. 1974), cert. denied, 425 U.S. 997 , 96 S.Ct. 2214 , 48 L.Ed.2d 823 (1976), in § 1988 cases), it offered no analysis of them, and did not…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
In re Randolph T.
No. 81-6154.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Mar 1, 1982.
Published
Citer courts: Tenth Circuit (2) · First Circuit (1)
Ct. App. Md. Cer-tiorari denied.