green
Positive treatment
4.4 score
Treatment trajectory · 1983 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1983
2004
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 12 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Maltby v. Winston
See Whitley v. Seibel, 613 F.2d 682, 686 (7th Cir.1980) (stating that an officer who "intentionally misleads those who do have the ultimate authority to authorize the arrest ... may be found to have deprived the arrestee of his liberty without due process of law"), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 942 , 103 S.Ct. 254 , 74 L.Ed.2d 198 (1982). 8 However, whatever Hankins' shortcomings, his information with regard to this transaction largely had been corroborated. 9 Consequently, the fact that Hankins' general reliability had been called into question by his flight would have had little, if any, bearing on…
discussed
Cited "see"
Maltby v. Winston
See Whitley v. Seibel, 613 F.2d 682, 686 (7th Cir.1980) (stating that an officer who “intentionally misleads those who do have the ultimate authority to authorize the arrest ... may be found to have deprived the arrestee of his liberty without due process of law”), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 942 , 103 S.Ct. 254 , 74 L.Ed.2d 198 (1982). 8 However, whatever Hankins’ shortcomings, his information with regard to this transaction largely had been corroborated. 9 Consequently, the fact that Hankins’ general reliability had been called into question by his flight would have had little, if any, be…
discussed
Cited "see"
Johnson v. City of Chicago
Cooper, Federal Practice and Procedure, § 4419 (1981); see Whitley v. Seibel, 676 F.2d 245 , 249 n. 8 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 942 , 103 S.Ct. 254 , 74 L.Ed.2d 198 (1982); cf. Haring, 462 U.S. at 318-20 , 103 S.Ct. at 2375-77 ; (theory of Fourth Amendment waiver unsupportable in the context of preclusion).
cited
Cited "see"
Joseph L. Bailey v. Kevin C. Andrews
See Whitley v. Seibel, 676 F.2d 245 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 942 , 103 S.Ct. 254 , 74 L.Ed.2d 198 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see"
Frederick L. Kunzelman, Cross-Appellee v. Gervase Thompson, Richard Giese and Juneau County, Wisconsin, Defendants- Cross-Appellants
See Whitley v. Seibel, 676 F.2d 245 , 248 & n. 1 (7th Cir.1982), certiorari denied, 459 U.S. 942 , 103 S.Ct. 254 , 74 L.Ed.2d 198 ; Restatement (Second) of Judgments § 27 (1982) (res judicata is claim preclusion; collateral estoppel is issue preclusion). 5 .
cited
Cited "see"
Llaguno v. Mingey
See Whitley v. Seibel, 613 F.2d 682, 685 (7th Cir.1980), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 942 , 103 S.Ct. 254 , 74 L.Ed.2d 198 (1982).
cited
Cited "see"
Llaguno v. Mingey
See Whitley v. Seibel, 613 F.2d 682, 685 (7th Cir.1980), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 942 , 103 S.Ct. 254 , 74 L.Ed.2d 198 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see"
Shacket v. Philko Aviation, Inc.
Collateral Estoppel Three questions must be answered “yes” to apply collateral estoppel to an issue in a later proceeding, Teamsters Local 282 Pension Trust Fund v. Angelos, 585 F.Supp. 1401, 1402 (N.D.Ill.1984); see Whitley v. Seibel, 676 F.2d 245, 248, 250 (7th Cir.), cert, denied, 459 U.S. 942 , 103 5.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. James A. Adams, United States of America v. Otto J. Runkel, United States of America v. Buddy Davis A/K/A Indian Philip Cohron Joe Wayne Jones and James A. Adams
Cook v. Beto, 425 F.2d 1066, 1067 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 400 U.S. 944 , 91 S.Ct. 248 , 27 L.Ed.2d 249 (1970); see also Johnson v. Spalding, 510 F.Supp. 164 (E.D.Wash.1981) (in habeas petition, no prejudice flowed from witnesses testifying in prison clothing), aff'd, 669 F.2d 589 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 942 , 103 S.Ct. 254 , 74 L.Ed.2d 198 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Adams
Cook v. Beto, 425 F.2d 1066, 1067 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 400 U.S. 944 , 91 S.Ct. 248 , 27 L.Ed.2d 249 (1970); see also Johnson v. Spalding, 510 F.Supp. 164 (E.D.Wash.1981) (in habeas petition, no prejudice flowed from witnesses testifying in prison clothing), aff'd, 669 F.2d 589 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 942 , 103 S.Ct. 254 , 74 L.Ed.2d 198 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
County of Cook v. Midcon Corp.
See, e.g., Whitley v. Seibel, 676 F.2d 245 , 248 & n. 1 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 942 , 103 S.Ct. 254 , 74 L.Ed.2d 198 (1982); Raper v. Hazelett and Erdal, 114 Ill.App.3d 649 , 70 Ill.Dec. 394 , 449 N.E.2d 268 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
The County Of Cook v. Midcon Corporation
See, e.g., Whitley v. Seibel, 676 F.2d 245 , 248 & n. 1 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 942 , 103 S.Ct. 254 , 74 L.Ed.2d 198 (1982); Raper v. Hazelett and Erdal, 114 Ill.App.3d 649 , 70 Ill.Dec. 394 , 449 N.E.2d 268 (1983).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
First National City Bank
v.
Banco para el Comercio Exterior de Cuba
v.
Banco para el Comercio Exterior de Cuba
No. 81-984.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 18, 1982.
Published
C. A. 2d Cir. Certio-rari granted.