green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
4.7 score
G Cite
cited 3× by 1 distinct case ·
“courts should carefully scrutinize the factual setting of each encounter of this type”
Treatment trajectory · 1985 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1985
2005
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 13 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
United States v. Minkowitz
courts should carefully scrutinize the factual setting of each encounter of this type
cited
Cited "see"
Nassau County v. New York State Urban Development Corp.
Corp. v Clear View Tech., 278 AD2d 1 [1st Dept 2000]; see Martin Roofing v Goldstein, 60 NY2d 262, 267-268 [1983], cert denied 466 US 905 [1984]).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Parker
See Garafola v. Wilkinson, 721 F.2d 420, 424-25 (3d Cir.1983) (“A state prison to which a federal prisoner has been parojed must make an entirely separate and independent judgment whether, under state criteria, the prisoner is entitled to state parole____ Where a prisoner has violated both state and federal law and is convicted by both forums, he has brought down upon himself the possibility of being paroled from federal prison to state prison.”), cert. denied, 466 U.S. 905 , 104 S.Ct. 1681 , 80 L.Ed.2d 155 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Datcher
See United v. Avery, 717 F.2d 1020, 1027 (6th Cir.1983) (upholding refusal to give an instruction on jury nullification because, "[ajlthough jurors may indeed have the power to ignore the law, their duty is to apply the law as interpreted by the court and they should be so instructed"), cert. denied, 466 U.S. 905 , 104 S.Ct. 1683 , 80 L.Ed.2d 157 (1984); United States v. Newman, 743 F.Supp. 533, 535 (M.D.Tenn.1990) (“A defendant in a criminal proceeding is not entitled to have a nullification instruction submitted to the jury.").
discussed
Cited "see"
William Isom Moses v. United States
See Garafola v. Wilkinson, 721 F.2d 420, 425 (3d Cir.1983), cert. denied, 466 U.S. 905 (1984); Causey v. Civiletti, 621 F.2d 691, 693 (5th Cir.1980); Small v. United States Bd. of Parole, 421 F.2d 1388, 1389 (10th Cir.) (per curiam), cert. denied, 397 U.S. 1079 (1970).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Herrin
See U.S. v. Avery, 717 F.2d 1020, 1024-1025 (6th Cir. 1983), cert. den., 466 U.S. 905 , 104 S.Ct. 1683 , 80 L.Ed.2d 157 (1984); U.S. v. Booth, 669 F.2d 1231, 1238 (9th Cir.1981); U.S. v. Prewitt, 553 F.2d 1082, 1085-1086 (7th Cir.), cert. den., 434 U.S. 840 , 98 S.Ct. 135 , 54 L.Ed.2d 104 (1977); U.S. ex rel.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Wind
See United States v. Lisotto, 722 F.2d 85 (4th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 466 U.S. 905 , 104 S.Ct. 1682 , 80 L.Ed.2d 157 (1984).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Martin Roman
See United States v. Piteo, 726 F.2d 50, 50 (2d Cir.1983), cert. denied, 466 U.S. 905 , 104 S.Ct. 1682 , 80 L.Ed.2d 156 (1984).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Ramon Sanchez
See United States v. Piteo, 726 F.2d 50, 52 (2d Cir.1983), cert. denied, 466 U.S. 905 , 104 S.Ct. 1682 , 80 L.Ed.2d 156 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Saratoga Associates Landscape Architects v. Lauter Development Group
Plaintiff did not allege that Zimmerman’s promise was supported by new and beneficial consideration or that the parties intended that Zimmerman was to become primarily liable on the debt (see Pyramid Champlain Co. v Brosseau & Co., 267 AD2d at 543 ; see also Martin Roofing v Goldstein, 60 NY2d 262, 268-269 [1983], cert denied 466 US 905 [1984]).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
C.D. Parry Co. v. Nichter
However, it became apparent in connection with the defendant’s motion for summary judgment that such an alleged agreement, which was concededly not memorialized in a writing, was voidable under the Statute of Frauds (see, General Obligations Law § 5-701 [a] [2]; Gary Powell, Inc. v Mendel/Borg Group, 237 AD2d 407 ; see also, Martin Roofing v Goldstein, 60 NY2d 262 , cert denied 466 US 905 ).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Walter Lee Brewer
Pennsylvania v. Muniz, 496 U.S. 582, 601 (1990); see also United States v. Avery, 717 F.2d 1020, 1024-25 (6th Cir.1983) ("the routine gathering of biographical data for booking purposes should not constitute interrogation under Miranda"), cert. denied, 466 U.S. 905 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Guillermo Soto
The Court in Innis instead emphasized as significant in determining whether the police conduct constituted interrogation a defendant’s perception of the police conduct and, as measured from the police perspective, the reasonable likelihood that such conduct would elicit an inculpatory response. 446 U.S. at 301 & n. 7, 100 S.Ct. at 1690 & n. 7; see also U.S. v. Avery, 717 F.2d 1020, 1024-25 (6th Cir.1983) (scrutinizing particular factual setting to conclude no interrogation), cert. denied, 466 U.S. 905 , 104 S.Ct. 1683 , 80 L.Ed.2d 157 (1984).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Buchanan
v.
Merit Board of the State Universities Civil Service System of Illinois
v.
Merit Board of the State Universities Civil Service System of Illinois
No. 83-1305.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Mar 26, 1984.
Published
Citer courts: E.D. New York (1)
App. Ct. Ill., 1st Dist. Certiorari denied.