green
Positive treatment
3.2 score
Treatment trajectory · 1985 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1985
2005
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 9 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "but see"
United States v. Pedro Carrasquillo-Plaza
But see United States v. Hemmer, 729 F.2d 10, 14-15 (1st Cir.) (defendant failed to establish Brady claim since he made only a general discovery request and reports were not obviously exculpatory in nature), cert. denied, 467 U.S. 1218 , 104 S.Ct. 2666 , 81 L.Ed.2d 371 (1984).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Gilbert H. Arreazola
See United States v. Drew, 722 F.2d 551, 552 (9th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 467 U.S. 1216 , 104 S.Ct. 2666 (1984).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Maribel Laboy, A/K/A Jennifer Morales, Mary Torres
See United States v. Hemmer, 729 F.2d 10, 13 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 467 U.S. 1218 , 104 S.Ct. 2666 , 81 L.Ed.2d 371 (1984); United States v. Mack, 892 F.2d 134 (1st Cir.1989).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Bruce Milton Mack
See United States v. Hemmer, 729 F.2d 10, 13 (1st Cir.) (“In order to succeed on a claimed violation of rule 16 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, a defendant must demonstrate that he has been prejudiced.”), cert. denied, 467 U.S. 1218 , 104 S.Ct. 2666 , 81 L.Ed.2d 371 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
Stephen W. Myatt v. United States
See United States v. Hemmer, 729 F.2d 10, 14-15 (1st Cir.) (stating that report which concluded that fingerprints retrieved from stolen money did not match those of defendant was not exculpatory), ce rt. denied, 467 U.S. 1218 , 104 S.Ct. 2666 , 81 L.Ed.2d 371 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Raymond Ellsworth v. Warden, New Hampshire State Prison, and Philip McLaughlin Attorney General for the State of New Hampshire
(2×)
See id. at 1190 ("Inadmissible evidence is by definition not material, because it never would have reached the jury and therefore could not have affected the trial outcome."); see also United States v. Hemmer, 729 F.2d 10 , 16 n.3 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 467 U.S. 1218 , 104 S.Ct. 2666 , 81 L.Ed.2d 371 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Gambino
See also United States v. Hemmer, 729 F.2d 10, 17 (1st Cir.) (inconsistencies between witness’s statements before grand jury and at trial do not warrant inference that government knowingly used false testimony), cert. denied, 467 U.S. 1218 , 104 S.Ct. 2666 , 81 L.Ed.2d 371 (1984); United States ex rel.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Alexander Bortnovsky, A/K/A \Sasha
See also United States v. Hemmer, 729 F.2d 10, 17 (1st Cir.) (inconsistencies between witness’s statements before grand jury and at trial do not warrant inference that government knowingly used false testimony), cert. denied, 467 U.S. 1218 , 104 S.Ct. 2666 , 81 L.Ed.2d 371 (1984); United States ex rel.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Ladabouche
United States v. Holladay, 566 F.2d 1018, 1019 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 831 (1978); see also United States v. Hemmer, 729 F.2d 10, 17 (1st Cir.) (“Simply because there existed inconsistencies between Lovasco’s grand jury and trial testimony does not warrant the inference that the government knowingly introduced perjurious testimony.”), cert denied, 467 U.S. 1218 , 104 S. Ct. 2666 (1984); State v. Kasper, supra (inconsistent prior testimony did not establish that prosecutor knew of falsity); State v. Searles, 108 Vt. 236, 239 , 184 A. 701, 702 (1936) (State has duty to produce a…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Beerbower
v.
Commissioner of Internal Revenue
v.
Commissioner of Internal Revenue
No. 83-6640.
Supreme Court of the United States.
May 29, 1984.
Published
C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.