green
Positive treatment
7.2 score
Treatment trajectory · 1985 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1985
2005
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 14 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Rupert v. Krautheimer (In Re Krautheimer)
See Goldstein v. Consolidated Edison Co. of New York, Inc., 93 A.D.2d 589, 591 , 462 N.Y.S.2d 646, 647 (1st Dep’t 1983), aff'd 62 N.Y.2d 936 , 479 N.Y.S.2d 213 , 468 N.E.2d 51 (1984), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1210 , 105 S.Ct. 1177 , 84 L.Ed.2d 326 (1985); Safchik v. Board of Education of the City of New York, 158 A.D.2d 277, 279 , 550 N.Y.S.2d 679, 681 (1st Dep’t 1990); Dye v. Lincoln First Bank of Rochester, 46 A.D.2d 172, 175-176, 361 N.Y.S.2d 449, 452-453 (4th Dep’t 1974), aff'd 38 N.Y.2d 769 , 381 N.Y.S.2d 228 , 344 N.E.2d 57 (1975) (focusing on the prior judgment order itself); Hines …
cited
Cited "see"
Dibbs v. Gonsalves
Accord Fern v. Turman, 736 F.2d 1367 (9th Cir.1984) cert. denied [ 469 U.S. 1210 ] 105 S.Ct. 1177 [ 84 L.Ed.2d 326 ] (1985); Bossom v. Bossom, 551 F.2d 474 (2d Cir.1976).
discussed
Cited "see"
Mayfield v. Dalton
See Fern v. Turman, 736 F.2d 1367, 1369 (9th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1210 , 105 S.Ct. 1177 , 84 L.Ed.2d 326 (1985) (claim that secretaries of the Army and Air Force should be required to strike plaintiffs’ names from list of retired officers subject to recall to active duty not ripe where there was no indication that either plaintiff faced recall). 1 The court finds that the military has demonstrated a compelling interest in both its need to account internally for the fate of its service members and in ensuring the peace of mind of their next of kin and dependents in time of war.
discussed
Cited "see"
Polur v. Raffe
See Koch v. Consolidated Edison Co. of New York, 62 N.Y.2d 548 , 554 & n. 2, 468 N.E.2d 1 , 4 & n. 2, 479 N.Y.S.2d 163 , 166 & n. 2 (1984), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1210 , 105 S.Ct. 1177 , 84 L.Ed.2d 326 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see"
Polur v. Raffe
See Koch v. Consolidated Edison Co. of New York, 62 N.Y.2d 548 , 554 & n. 2, 468 N.E.2d 1 , 4 & n. 2, 479 N.Y.S.2d 163 , 166 & n. 2 (1984), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1210 , 105 S.Ct. 1177 , 84 L.Ed.2d 326 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see"
Benjamin v. Coughlin
Restatement (Second) of Judgments Sec. 27 comment c (1982); see Koch v. Consolidated Edison Co. of New York, 62 N.Y.2d 548 , 554 n. 2 & 555 n. 4, 468 N.E.2d 1 , 4 nn. 2 & 4, 479 N.Y.S.2d 163 , 166 nn. 2 & 4 (1984) (adopting the issue preclusion factors outlined in the Restatement), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1210 , 105 S.Ct. 1177 , 84 L.Ed.2d 326 (1985). 20 The action at bar was commenced in 1979, several years before the state court decisions in Lewis and Overton.
discussed
Cited "see"
Benjamin v. Coughlin
Restatement (Second) of Judgments § 27 comment c (1982); see Koch v. Consolidated Edison Co. of New York, 62 N.Y.2d 548 , 554 n. 2 & 555 n. 4, 468 N.E.2d 1 , 4 nn. 2 & 4, 479 N.Y.S.2d 163 , 166 nn. 2 & 4 (1984) (adopting the issue preclusion factors outlined in the Restatement), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1210 , 105 S.Ct. 1177 , 84 L.Ed.2d 326 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see"
Leroy S. Williams v. The State of Washington
See Fern v. Turman, 736 F.2d 1367 (9th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1210 , 105 S.Ct. 1177 , 84 L.Ed.2d 326 (1985); Whittington v. Whittington, 733 F.2d 620 (9th Cir.1984); Armstrong v. Armstrong, 696 F.2d 1237 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 933 , 104 S.Ct. 337 , 78 L.Ed.2d 306 (1983).
cited
Cited "see"
Transamerica Occidental Life Insurance Company, a Corporation, Plaintiff v. Linda Ann Digregorio
See Fern v. Turman, 736 F.2d 1367, 1370 (9th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1210 , 105 S.Ct. 1177 , 84 L.Ed.2d 326 (1985); Geni-Chlor Int’l, Inc. v. Multisonics Dev.
cited
Cited "see"
Fagone v. Fagone
Accord Fern v. Turman, 736 F.2d 1367 (9th Cir.1984) cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1210 , 105 S.Ct. 1177 , 84 L.Ed.2d 326 (1985); Bossom v. Bossom, 551 F.2d 474 (2d Cir.1976). 793 F.2d at 418 .
cited
Cited "see"
Hannah Gonzalez Canevero v. Richard Rexach, Etc.
Accord Fern v. Turman, 736 F.2d 1367 (9th Cir.1984) cert. denied — U.S. -, 105 S.Ct. 1177 , 84 L.Ed.2d 326 (1985); Bossom v. Bossom, 551 F.2d 474 (2d Cir. 1976).
discussed
Cited "see"
Federal Insurance v. Argitakos
GTF Marketing, Inc. v. Colonial Aluminum Sales, Inc., 108 A.D.2d 86, 89 , 488 N.Y.S.2d 219, 223 (2d Dep’t 1985); see Koch v. Consolidated Edison Co. of New York, Inc., 62 N.Y.2d 548, 556-57 , 468 N.E.2d 1, 5-6 , 479 N.Y.S.2d 163, 167-68 (1984), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 105 S.Ct. 1177 , 84 L.Ed.2d 326 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see"
Kaufman v. Eli Lilly & Co.
First, the identical issue necessarily must have been decided in the prior action and be decisive of the present action, and second, the party to be precluded from relitigating the issue must have had a full and fair opportunity to contest the prior determination (Gilberg v Barbieri, supra, at p 291; Schwartz v Public Administrator, supra, at p 71; see, Koch v Consolidated Edison Co., 62 NY2d 548, 554-555 , cert denied _ US _, 105 S Ct 1177 ; Ryan v New York Tel.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Ellison v. Sadur
See, e.g., Fern v. Turman, 736 F.2d 1367, 1370 (9th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1210 , 105 S.Ct. 1177 , 84 L.Ed.2d 326 (1985).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Fern
v.
Turman
v.
Turman
No. 84-769.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Feb 19, 1985.
Published
C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.