green
Positive treatment
3.8 score
Treatment trajectory · 1986 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1986
2006
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 10 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
In Re VIII South Michigan Associates
See Waffenschmidt v. MacKay, 763 F.2d 711 (5th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 1056 , 106 S.Ct. 794 , 88 L.Ed.2d 771 (1986); Select Creations, Inc. v. Paliafito America, Inc., 852 F.Supp. 740 (E.D.Wis.1994).
discussed
Cited "see"
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation v. D.L. Faulkner
See Waffenschmidt v. MacKay, 763 F.2d 711, 717-18 (5th Cir.1985) (reviewing jurisdiction issue de novo), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 1056 , 106 S.Ct. 794 , 88 L.Ed.2d 771 (1986); Dixon, 835 F.2d at 563-66 (reviewing scope of injunction issue de novo). 14 Under Fed.R.Civ.P. 65(d), "[e]very order granting an injunction and every restraining order ... is binding only upon the parties to the action, ... and upon those persons in active concert or participation with them who receive actual notice of the order by personal service or otherwise." See also Waffenschmidt, 763 F.2d at 717 ("An injunction bind…
discussed
Cited "see"
Federal Deposit Insurance v. Faulkner
See Waffenschmidt v. MacKay, 763 F.2d 711, 717-18 (5th Cir.1985) (reviewing jurisdiction issue de novo), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 1056 , 106 S.Ct. 794 , 88 L.Ed.2d 771 (1986); Dixon, 835 F.2d at 563-66 (reviewing scope of injunction issue de novo).
discussed
Cited "see"
New York State National Organization for Women v. Terry
See Waffenschmidt v. Mackay, 763 F.2d 711, 720 (5th Cir.1985) (court has inherent power to enforce injunctive decrees lest court orders may be flouted, obstructed and violated with impunity, and Rule 4(f) does not bar extra-territorial service of an order to show cause for contempt), ce rt. denied, 474 U.S. 1056 , 106 S.Ct. 794 , 88 L.Ed.2d 771 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see"
NY STATE NAT. ORGANIZATION FOR WOMEN v. Terry
See Waffenschmidt v. Mackay, 763 F.2d 711, 720 (5th Cir.1985) (court has inherent power to enforce injunctive decrees lest court orders may be flouted, obstructed and violated with impunity, and Rule 4(f) does not bar extra-territorial service of an order to show cause for contempt), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 1056 , 106 S.Ct. 794 , 88 L.Ed.2d 771 (1986).
cited
Cited "see"
Stotler and Company, Cross-Appellee v. William J. Able, Cross-Appellant
Accord Waffenschmidt v. MacKay, 763 F.2d 711 , 717 (5th Cir.1985) (discussing contempt power in a Rule 65(d) injunction context), cert. denied, 474 U.s. 1056, 106 S.Ct. 794 , 88 L.Ed.2d 771 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see"
Algonquin Gas Transmission Company v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Bay State Gas Company, Intervenors
See Natural Gas Pipeline Co., 27 FERC ¶ 61,201 (1984), reh’g denied, 28 FERC ¶ 61,020 (1984), aff'd, Natural Gas Pipeline Co. v. FERC, 765 F.2d 1155 (D.C.Cir.1985), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 106 S.Ct. 794 , 88 L.Ed.2d 771 (1986). 7 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Burdine v. Johnson
McComb v. Jacksonville Paper Co., 336 U.S. 187, 191 , 69 S.Ct. 497 , 93 L.Ed. 599 (1949); see also Waffenschmidt v. MacKay, 763 F.2d 711, 726 (5th Cir. 1985), cert, denied, 474 U.S. 1056 , 106 S.Ct. 794 , 88 L.Ed.2d 771 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Lorraine McGuire Wife Of/and Jack Valley v. Sigma Coatings, Inc., James Veach, Movant-Appellant
See also Waffenschmidt v. MacKay, 763 F.2d 711 (5th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 1056 , 106 S.Ct. 794 , 88 L.Ed.2d 771 (1986), in which defendants, who were not parties in the underlying litigation, were found to have violated an injunction by helping a party transfer disputed *908 funds out of the court's jurisdiction. ■ Relying on Rule 65, we held that "[n]onparlies who reside outside the territorial jurisdiction of a. district court may be subject to that court's jurisdiction if, with actual notice of the court’s order, they actively aid and abet a party in violating that order.”…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Select Creations, Inc. v. Paliafito America, Inc.
Id. at 623 ; see also Waffenschmidt v. MacKay, 763 F.2d 711, 717 (5th Cir.1985) (non-parties residing without territorial jurisdiction of district court may be subject to court’s jurisdiction if, with actual notice of court’s order, they actively aid and abet party in violating that order, even if non-parties have no other contacts with forum), cert, denied sub nom, Currey v. Waffenschmidt, 474 U.S. 1056 , 106 S.Ct. 794 , 88 L.Ed.2d 771 (1986). 97.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Natural Gas Pipeline Company of America
v.
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
v.
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
No. 85-592.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 13, 1986.
Published
C. A. D. C. Cir. Certiorari denied.