green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 2×
9.6 score
G Cite
cited 2× by 1 distinct case, last quoted 1993 ·
…he inclusion of malquist's lack of repentance in the court's sentencing calculus was permissible.
⚠ not in text
Treatment trajectory · 1986 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1986
2006
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 20 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "but see"
United States v. Sakhawat Ullah, Jr., United States of America v. Mary Katherine Gosho-Kim
But see United States v. Reed, 790 F.2d 208, 210-11 (2nd Cir.), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 954 , 107 S.Ct. 445 , 93 L.Ed.2d 393 (1986) (upholding conviction by thirteen-person jury agreed to by defendant as harmless error); United States v. Stewart, 700 F.2d 702, 704-05 (11th Cir.1983) (permitting defendant to stipulate to a thirteen-person jury).
discussed
Cited "but see"
United States v. Henry Sivils (90-6366) Jerry Stokes (90-6375) William Dillard (90-6376) and Sherrill Jordan (90-6420)
But see United States v. Reed, 790 F.2d 208, 210 (2d Cir.) (requiring a showing of prejudice even where an alternate participates in the jury’s deliberations), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 954 , 107 S.Ct. 445 , 93 L.Ed.2d 393 (1986).
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Saenz v. State
(2×)
he inclusion of malquist's lack of repentance in the court's sentencing calculus was permissible.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Macmillan, Inc. v. American Express Co.
because full relief is available under ... section , we need not decide the claim asserted under rule 10b-13
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Washington
P. 26.01, subd. 1(4); see Reed v. United States, 479 U.S. 954, 954 , 107 S.Ct. 445, 445 , 93 L.Ed.2d 393 (1986) (mem.) (White, J., dissenting from denial of certiorari).
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Washington
P. 26.01, subd. 1(4); see Reed v. United States, 479 U.S. 954, 954 , 107 S.Ct. 445, 445 , 93 L.Ed.2d 393 (1986) (mem.) (White, J., dissenting from denial of certiorari).
discussed
Cited "see"
97 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 6651, 97 Daily Journal D.A.R. 10,897 United States of America v. Marvin Henson, United States of America v. Bruce L. Suiters
(2×)
See United States v. Malquist, 791 F.2d 1399, 1402 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 954 , 107 S.Ct. 445 , 93 L.Ed.2d 394 (1986) (refusal to release grand jury transcript).
discussed
Cited "see"
Greatwood v. United States, Internal Revenue Service (In Re Greatwood)
(2×)
See, United States v. Malquist, 791 F.2d 1399, 1401 (9th Cir.1986), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 954 , 107 S.Ct. 445 , 93 L.Ed.2d 394 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see"
Taylor v. State
See Woods v. State, 490 So.2d 24, 26 (Fla.) (three peremptories exercised by state against blacks did not rise to level needed to require trial court to inquire into state's motives for challenges), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 954 , 107 S.Ct. 446 , 93 L.Ed.2d 394 (1986).
cited
Cited "see"
Adams v. State
See Woods v. State, 490 So.2d 24 (Fla.), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 954 , 107 S.Ct. 446 , 93 L.Ed.2d 394 (1986).
cited
Cited "see"
Casimiro v. State
See Woods v. State, 490 So.2d 24 (Fla.), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 954 , 107 S.Ct. 446 , 93 L.Ed.2d 394 (1986); Thomas v. State, 502 So.2d 994 (Fla. 4th DCA), review denied, 509 So.2d 1119 (Fla. 1987).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Ted H. Kimball
(2×)
See United States v. Malquist, 791 F.2d 1399, 1401 (9th Cir.) (quoting United States v. Grabinski, 727 F.2d 681 (8th Cir.1984)), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 954 , 107 S.Ct. 445 , 93 L.Ed.2d 394 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Oliyinka Sobamowo
See United States v. Reed, 790 F.2d 208, 210 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 954 , 107 S.Ct. 445 , 93 L.Ed.2d 393 (1986) (violation of Rule 24(c) does not require reversal absent showing of prejudice).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Lutrell Davis
(2×)
See United States v. Malquist, 791 F.2d 1399, 1402 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 954 , 107 S.Ct. 445 , 93 L.Ed.2d 394 (1986); Sirhan, 504 F.2d at 820 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Litton Industries, Inc. v. Lehman Bros. Kuhn Loeb
DuPont de Nemours & Co., 615 F.Supp. 96 (S.D.N.Y.1985) (tendering shareholder has private right of action under rule 14e-3); O’Connor v. Dean Witter Reynolds, Inc., 529 F.Supp. 1179, 1189-93 (S.D.N.Y.1981) (private right of action for damages under rule 14e-3 extended to options trader); see *451 also Pryor v. United States Steel Corp., 591 F.Supp. 942, 961-62 (S.D.N.Y.1984) (shareholder has implied right of action under rule 14e-1(c)), aff'd in part and rev’d in part, 794 F.2d 52 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 954 , 107 S.Ct. 445 , 93 L.Ed.2d 393 (1986); Camelot, 535 F.Supp. at 1182-83…
discussed
Cited "see"
Polaroid Corp. v. Disney
See Pryor v. United States Steel Corp., 794 F.2d 52, 57-58 (2d Cir.) (shareholders have right of action under section 14(d)(6)), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 954 , 107 S.Ct. 445 , 93 L.Ed.2d 393 (1986); Field v. Trump, 850 F.2d 938, 946 (2d Cir.1988) (shareholders have right of action under section 14(d)(7)).
discussed
Cited "see"
Polaroid Corporation v. Disney
See Pryor v. United States Steel Corp., 794 F.2d 52, 57-58 (2d Cir.) (shareholders have right of action under section 14(d)(6)), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 954 , 107 S.Ct. 445 , 93 L.Ed.2d 393 (1986); Field v. Trump, 850 F.2d 938, 946 (2d Cir.1988) (shareholders have right of action under section 14(d)(7)). 42 In light of the judicial construction of Rule 10b-5 and Borak, it is reasonable to conclude that Congress passed the Williams Act with an understanding that courts would construe the Act as creating private remedies that would enforce the provisions of the Act effectively.
cited
Cited "see"
Kibler v. State
See Woods v. State, 490 So.2d 24 (Fla.), cert. denied, ___ U.S. ___, 107 S.Ct. 446 , 93 L.Ed.2d 394 (1986); Parker v. State, 476 So.2d 134 (Fla. 1985).
cited
Cited "see"
Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 93,060 the Connecticut National Bank v. Fluor Corporation and Fluor Acquisition Corporation
See Pryor v. United States Steel Corp., 794 F.2d 52 , 55 & n. 5 (2 Cir.) (discussing pro-ration requirement and recent change in SEC rules), cert. denied, 107 S.Ct. 445 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Roberto Gonzalez
(2×)
United States v. Henry, 883 F.2d 1010, 1012 (11th Cir.1989); see also United States v. Malquist, 791 F.2d 1399, 1402-03 (9th Cir.)) (court could include defendant’s lack of repentance in sentencing calculus), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 954 , 107 S.Ct. 445 , 93 L.Ed.2d 394 (1986).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Malquist
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 86-5321.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Nov 10, 1986.
C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Justice White would grant certiorari.